California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB41

Introduced
12/3/24  
Refer
1/29/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Refer
6/30/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/9/25  
Refer
7/9/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  

Caption

Pharmacy benefits.

Impact

The legislation will significantly alter the operations of pharmacy benefit managers, particularly in how they interact with both patients and pharmacies. Starting January 1, 2026, contracts that include spread pricing will be prohibited, thereby preventing PBMs from exploiting pricing discrepancies for profit. Insurance policies will also be limited in how they calculate patient cost-sharing, ensuring that patients do not pay more than the actual rate paid by the insurer for any medication. This move is intended to promote fairness and transparency within the pharmaceutical pricing system.

Summary

Senate Bill 41, put forth by Senators Wiener and Wahab, addresses the regulation of pharmacy benefits within California. The bill aims to amend existing laws concerning pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and health insurance contracts by prohibiting actions that obstruct patient access to prescription drugs. It mandates that PBMs must not limit a patient’s choice of pharmacy, impose discriminatory conditions against non-affiliated pharmacies, or delay the dispensing of medications. Furthermore, PBMs will be required to adopt a passthrough pricing model, transparently delineating fees derived from their services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 41 appears to be generally positive among patient advocacy groups and some legislators who see it as a necessary measure to protect consumer rights and enhance access to medications. However, there are concerns from certain industry stakeholders who argue that the regulations could impose undue burdens on PBMs and may disrupt established relationships within the pharmaceutical network. Overall, the discussions reflect a commitment to improving healthcare access while balancing the interests of various parties involved.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the implications of the regulations on the business model of pharmacy benefit managers. Critics argue that restricting PBM operations could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased premiums for insurance plans or higher costs for consumers in the long run. Additionally, the elimination of certain pricing models, such as spread pricing, raises questions about how PBMs will adapt to this new regulatory environment without harming the overall efficiency of drug distribution and pricing. As the bill progresses, these debates are expected to intensify.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB966

Pharmacy benefits.

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

CA AB1286

Pharmacy.

CA SB524

Pharmacists: furnishing prescription medications.

CA AB425

Medi-Cal: pharmacogenomic testing.

CA AB1060

Health care coverage: naloxone hydrochloride.

CA AB317

Pharmacist service coverage.

CA SB1089

Food and prescription access: grocery and pharmacy closures.

CA AB1557

Pharmacy: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB2180

Health care coverage: cost sharing.

Similar Bills

CA SB966

Pharmacy benefits.

CA SB1361

Prescription drugs: cost sharing: pharmacy benefit managers.

CA AB910

Pharmacy benefit management.

CA AB315

Pharmacy benefit management.

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

NV SB316

Revises provisions relating to insurance. (BDR 57-777)