California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB576

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Report Pass
4/28/25  
Report Pass
4/28/25  

Caption

Video streaming services: commercial advertisements.

Impact

The implementation of SB 576 would add a new chapter to the Business and Professions Code, specifically Chapter 27.3, which addresses video streaming services. Such regulatory measures aim to harmonize state laws with existing federal standards, ensuring that all video content viewers consume through streaming platforms is delivered with acceptable auditory levels. This law could have a significant impact on how streaming companies manage their ad placements, potentially leading to adjustments in advertising strategies across the industry. Additionally, it positions California as a leading state in consumer protection efforts regarding media consumption.

Summary

Senate Bill 576, introduced by Senator Umberg and co-authored by Senator Niello, aims to regulate the audio levels of commercial advertisements on video streaming services in California. Specifically, the bill prohibits streaming services from transmitting audio advertisements that are louder than the content of the accompanying video. This proposal aligns with existing federal regulations enforced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) which requires similar volume control for traditional television broadcasts. By implementing these restrictions on streaming platforms, the bill seeks to enhance viewer comfort and prevent intrusive advertising practices, thereby reflecting a growing concern over consumer experience in the digital age.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 576 has generally been favorable among consumer advocacy groups who argue that it promotes a more pleasant viewing experience and protects consumers from overwhelming audio advertisements. In contrast, there may be some pushback from streaming services that view this legislation as an additional regulatory burden that could complicate advertising strategies. Nonetheless, the bill appears to be well-received by lawmakers who recognize the need for these adjustments in response to changing media consumption behaviors.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 576 include debates on the balance between regulatory oversight and corporate flexibility. Critics argue that such regulations might stifle innovation within the advertising sector and impose unnecessary costs on streaming services. Proponents, however, emphasize the importance of consumer rights and the need to ensure that advertising practices do not detract from the user experience. The bill's relationship with federal regulations is also a focal point of discussion, as stakeholders assess the implications of state-level laws potentially overlapping with national standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

US HB2422

CALM Modernization Act of 2023 Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Modernization Act of 2023

US SB1127

CALM Modernization Act of 2023 Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Modernization Act of 2023

AZ SB1179

Video service; boundary change; definition

NC H714

NC Junk Fee Prevention Act

KY HB610

AN ACT relating to revenue.

CT SB00278

An Act Concerning A Study Of Community Access Programming Operations.

CT SB00176

An Act Concerning Establishment Of A Fee Paid By Multichannel Video Programming Distributors To Companies Or Organizations Responsible For Community Access Programming.

NC H955

NC Junk Fee Prevention Act