California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB7

Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
1/29/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  

Caption

Employment: automated decision systems.

Impact

The bill is designed to enhance workers' rights by allowing them access to the data that these systems use and the outputs they generate. Workers are granted the right to correct any inaccuracies in the data, as well as to appeal decisions made through the use of ADS. This could potentially lead to significant changes in how employers implement technology in decision-making processes, focusing more on accountability and fairness in the workplace.

Summary

Senate Bill 7 aims to regulate the use of automated decision systems (ADS) in employment, requiring employers to disclose such systems' usage to workers who may be affected. This legislation seeks to protect workers by mandating transparency regarding the technologies employed to make employment-related decisions, excluding hiring. Employers are required to provide written notices to affected workers, maintain a list of ADS in use, and inform job applicants about the use of ADS for hiring decisions.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 7 appears to be supportive among advocates for workers' rights, who view it as a necessary step towards ensuring that technology does not undermine individual rights or due process in employment decisions. Conversely, some opposing views may arise from employers concerned about the additional administrative burdens and potential challenges associated with complying with the stated requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from employers regarding the practical implications of the bill, such as the added complexity of managing automated decision systems and the potential for increased liability. Opponents might argue that the regulations could stifle innovation or prevent employers from utilizing beneficial technologies effectively. Furthermore, the requirement for a human reviewer in the appeals process raises questions about the feasibility and implementation of these safeguards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1221

Workplace surveillance tools.

CA AB1651

Worker rights: Workplace Technology Accountability Act.

CA AB1331

Workplace surveillance.

MA H1873

Preventing a dystopian work environment

VT H0114

An act relating to restricting electronic monitoring of employees and employment-related automated decision systems

VT H0262

An act relating to restricting electronic monitoring of employees and the use of employment-related automated decision systems

CA SB530

Construction industry: discrimination and harassment prevention.

RI H7917

Rhode Island Information Privacy Act