California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB8

Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
1/29/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Engrossed
5/27/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  

Caption

Peace officers: injury or illness: leaves of absence.

Impact

The enactment of SB 8 significantly impacts California's public employment laws, particularly enhancing protections for peace officers regarding their rights to paid leave for injuries or illnesses sustained in the line of duty. This modification is intended to align with similar provisions in the existing workers' compensation framework, potentially resulting in improved morale and support for public safety personnel. Discussions around the bill have highlighted the critical nature of ensuring that those who serve in high-risk positions are given due recognition and support for their sacrifices and service to the community.

Summary

Senate Bill 8, introduced by Senator Ashby, aims to amend Section 4850 of the Labor Code in California to expand the provisions for leaves of absence concerning public safety employees, specifically peace officers. The bill seeks to establish that certain peace officers employed on a regular, full-time basis by counties of the eighth class are entitled to paid leave while disabled by injury or illness arising from their duties. This includes a diverse group of public safety employees such as city police officers, firefighters, sheriffs, probation officers, and others. By broadening the scope of eligible personnel, the bill acknowledges the challenges faced by peace officers in terms of health impacts due to their occupations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 8 is generally positive, with strong support from law enforcement agencies and advocacy groups highlighting the necessity of such protections for peace officers. Proponents argue that this bill is a vital acknowledgment of the risks associated with law enforcement duties and acts as an essential step in ensuring the welfare of those who protect public safety. However, there may be concerns raised regarding the fiscal implications for counties and the sustainability of such provisions in the long run, especially if additional financial burdens are placed on local government budgets.

Contention

While SB 8 generally enjoys bipartisan support, some contention arises over the potential ramifications it could have on local government finances. Opponents may argue that expanding leave entitlements could lead to budgetary constraints for smaller counties or that it could complicate existing workers' compensation systems by introducing additional layers of eligibility. The discussions reflect the broader conversation about how best to balance comprehensive support for public safety employees with the fiscal realities faced by local governments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1058

Peace officers: injury or illness: leaves of absence.

CA AB699

Workers’ compensation: presumed injuries.

CA AB2134

School employees: transfer of leave of absence for illness or injury.

CA SB449

Peace officers: Peace Officer Standards Accountability Advisory Board.

CA AB2138

Peace officers: tribal police pilot project.

CA SB400

Peace officers: confidentiality of records.

CA AB459

Peace officers: Attorney General: reports.

CA AB2923

Peace officers: public complaints.

CA AB1839

Peace officers: education and hiring grants.

CA AB852

Peace officers.

Similar Bills

CA AB346

Workers’ compensation: leaves of absence.

CA SB1058

Peace officers: injury or illness: leaves of absence.

CA AB3120

Pupil instruction: instructional time requirements.

CA AB2047

Workers’ compensation: City of Oceanside.

CA AB872

Leave of absence: firefighters.

CA AB2797

Leave of absence: firefighters.

CA AB2967

Public Employees’ Retirement System: contracting agencies: exclusion from membership.

CA SB230

Workers’ compensation: firefighters.