Colorado 2022 2022 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1122 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/28/2022

                    Page 1 
February 25, 2022  HB 22-1122  
 
 Legislative Council Staff 
Nonpartisan Services for Colorado’s Legislature 
 
Fiscal Note  
  
 
Drafting Number: 
Prime Sponsors: 
LLS 22-0243  
Rep. Will 
Sen. Jaquez Lewis  
Date: 
Bill Status: 
Fiscal Analyst: 
February 25, 2022 
House Health & Insurance  
Annie Scott | 303-866-5851 
Annie.Scott@state.co.us  
Bill Topic: PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGER PROHIBITED PRACTICES  
Summary of  
Fiscal Impact: 
☐ State Revenue 
☒ State Expenditure 
☒ State Transfer 
☐ TABOR Refund 
☒ Local Government 
☐ Statutory Public Entity 
 
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to reimburse pharmacies at certain rates, 
and also creates the 340B Prescription Drug Program Anti-Discrimination Act.  The bill 
increases state expenditures on an ongoing basis. 
Appropriation 
Summary: 
For FY 2022-23, the bill requires an appropriation of $17,109 to the Department of 
Regulatory Agencies. 
Fiscal Note 
Status: 
The fiscal note reflects the introduced bill. 
 
 
Table 1 
State Fiscal Impacts Under HB 22-1122 
 
  
Budget Year 
FY 2022-23 
Out Year 
FY 2023-24 
Revenue 
 
-       	-       
Expenditures 	Cash Funds 	$17,109 	$20,530 
 	Centrally Appropriated 	$6,164        $6,797 
 	Total Expenditures 	$23,273        $27,327 
 	Total FTE 	0.3 FTE        0.3 FTE        
Diversion 	General Fund 	($23,273)        ($27,327) 
 	Cash Funds 	$23,273        $27,327 
 	Net Diversion 	$0 	$0        
 
 
    Page 2 
February 25, 2022  HB 22-1122  
 
Summary of Legislation 
For all contracts between a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) and a pharmacy entered into or renewed 
on or after January 1, 2023, the bill prohibits a PBM or their representative from reimbursing a 
pharmacy for a prescription drug in an amount that is less than: 
 
 the national average drug acquisition (NADA) cost at the time the drug is administered or 
dispensed, plus a professional dispensing fee; or  
 the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug, plus a professional dispensing fee, if the NADA is not 
available.   
 
The bill also creates the 340B Prescription Drug Program Anti-Discrimination Act, which, among its 
provisions, prohibits a third party that reimburses a 340B covered entity for 340B drugs from imposing 
fees, charge backs, or other adjustments on covered entities or contract pharmacies based on their 
participation in the 340B drug pricing program, or requiring a claim for a drug to include a modifier 
to indicate that the drug is a 340B drug unless the claim is for payment, directly or indirectly, by the 
Medicaid program.   
 
A PBM or any other third party that makes payment for the 340B drugs for an eligible patient must 
not discriminate against a 340B covered entity in a manner that prevents or interferes with the patient's 
choice to receive the drugs from that entity.  Violation of the 340B Prescription Drug Program 
Anti-Discrimination Act by a third party is an unfair or deceptive act or practice.  The Commissioner 
of Insurance may adopt rules to enforce the bill. 
Background 
The 340B Prescription Drug Program is named for Section 340B of the federal Public Health Service 
Act, passed in 1992.  To have their drugs covered by Medicaid and Medicare Part B, pharmaceutical 
manufacturers enter into a pricing agreement with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 
provide discounts on covered outpatient drugs purchased by covered entities that serve vulnerable 
patients.   
Assumptions 
The fiscal note assumes that the bill will generate 200 complaints per fiscal year and that each 
complaint will require 3 hours of Division of Insurance (DOI) staff time for: 
 
• taking complaint information; 
• corresponding with and gathering information from the involved carrier; 
• conducting an investigation; and  
• determining whether the carrier is in compliance with the statute.   
 
The fiscal note also assumes the DOI will receive 200 inquiries per fiscal year, each requiring 
15 minutes of staff time.  If additional information becomes available to clarify these assumptions, the 
fiscal note will be revised to reflect the new information.  Page 3 
February 25, 2022  HB 22-1122  
 
State Diversion 
The bill diverts $23,273 from the General Fund to the Division of Insurance Cash Fund in FY 2022-23, 
and $27,327 in FY 2023-24.  This revenue diversion occurs because the bill increases costs in the DOI, 
which is funded with premium tax revenue that would otherwise be credited to the General Fund. 
State Expenditures 
The bill increases state expenditures in the DOI in Department of Regulatory Agencies by $23,273 in 
FY 2022-23, and $27,327 in FY 2023-24 from the Division of Insurance Cash Fund.  Expenditures are 
shown in Table 2 and detailed below. 
 
Table 2 
Expenditures Under HB 22-1122 
 
 	FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 
Department of Regulatory Agencies   
Personal Services 	$17,109      $20,530 
Centrally Appropriated Costs
1
 	$6,164 $6,797 
Total Cost $23,273 $27,327 
Total FTE 0.3 FTE 0.3 FTE 
1
 Centrally appropriated costs are not included in the bill's appropriation. 
   
Department of Regulatory Agencies.  Beginning in FY 2022-23, based on the assumptions listed 
above, the DOI requires 0.3 FTE to address complaints and inquiries generated by the bill.  The DOI 
will also experience a workload increase for rulemaking, which can be accomplished within existing 
appropriations and budgeted legal services hours.  
 
Health Care Policy and Financing.  It is assumed that any changes to rates under Child Health Plan 
Plus (CHP+) program will be addressed through the annual budget process.  
 
State employee insurance.  The bill may result in increased costs for prescription drugs leading to 
higher insurance premiums, which will be shared by state agencies and employees after the first plan 
year. In addition, changes to prescription drug costs will need to be adopted by the Division of 
Workers’ Compensation and charged to the workers’ compensation claims of each agency through 
the Workers’ Compensation actuarial process.  Any increase in costs will be addressed through the 
annual budget process.   
 
Centrally appropriated costs. Pursuant to a Joint Budget Committee policy, certain costs associated 
with this bill are addressed through the annual budget process and centrally appropriated in the Long 
Bill or supplemental appropriations bills, rather than in this bill.  These costs, which include employee 
insurance and supplemental employee retirement payments, are shown in Table 2. 
  Page 4 
February 25, 2022  HB 22-1122  
 
Local Government  
Similar to state employee insurance, to the extent that the costs increase for local government 
insurance plans, cost increases will be shared by local governments and employees. 
Effective Date 
The bill takes effect 90 days following adjournment of the General Assembly sine die, assuming no 
referendum petition is filed. 
State Appropriations 
For FY 2022-23, the bill requires an appropriation of $17,109 to the Department of Regulatory Agencies 
from Division of Insurance Cash fund, and 0.3 FTE.   
State and Local Government Contacts 
Health Care Policy and Financing  Information Technology 
Law  Personnel  
Public Health and Environment Regulatory Agencies 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The revenue and expenditure impacts in this fiscal note represent changes from current law under the bill for each 
fiscal year.  For additional information about fiscal notes, please visit:  leg.colorado.gov/fiscalnotes.