Colorado 2022 2022 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1128 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/04/2022

                    Page 1 
February 3, 2022   HB 22-1128  
 
 Legislative Council Staff 
Nonpartisan Services for Colorado’s Legislature 
 
Fiscal Note  
  
 
Drafting Number: 
Prime Sponsors: 
LLS 22-0545  
Rep. Pico 
  
Date: 
Bill Status: 
Fiscal Analyst: 
February 3, 2022  
House SCVMA  
Anna Gerstle | 303-866-4375 
Anna.Gerstle@state.co.us  
Bill Topic: PRIOR REVIEW OF AGENCY RULES THAT BURDEN INDUSTRY  
Summary of  
Fiscal Impact: 
☒ State Revenue 
☒ State Expenditure 
☐ State Transfer 
☐ TABOR Refund 
☐ Local Government 
☐ Statutory Public Entity 
 
The bill makes changes to rule review processes, including review by the General 
Assembly and Governor’s Office and consideration of rules that are expected to have 
an economic impact.  The bill increases state expenditures on an ongoing basis.  
Appropriation 
Summary: 
For FY 2022-23, the bill requires an appropriation of $688,357 to multiple state 
agencies.  
Fiscal Note 
Status: 
The fiscal note reflects the introduced bill. 
 
 
Table 1 
State Fiscal Impacts Under HB 22-1128 
 
  
Budget Year 
FY 2022-23 
Out Year 
FY 2023-24 
Revenue 
 
-       	-       
Expenditures 	General Fund 	$634,328  	$664,639  
 	Cash Funds 	$54,029  	$4,770  
 	Centrally Appropriated 	$25,168  	$31,699  
 	Total Expenditures 	$713,525  	$701,108  
 	Total FTE 	4.1 FTE 	4.4 FTE 
Transfers  	-       	-       
Other Budget Impacts General Fund Reserve 	$95,149       $99,696       
 
 
 
    Page 2 
February 3, 2022   HB 22-1128  
 
Summary of Legislation 
The bill makes changes to state law related to rule review processes, beginning November 1, 2022.  
 
Determination of economic impact rules.  Beginning November 1, 2022, the bill requires that a state 
agency make a determination at a rulemaking hearing whether a proposed rule is expected to have 
an economic impact and include that determination in its regulatory analysis of a proposed rule.  
“Economic impact rules” are defined as those that significantly increase the regulatory burden on 
businesses, professions, or industry, including oil and gas, aerospace, energy efficiency, 
environmental technology, transportation, and agriculture industries.  
 
Governor’s Office review.  Beginning November 1, 2022, rules or rule changes must be submitted to 
the Governor’s Office for review, and state agencies may not adopt a rule or rule change unless the 
Governor’s Office determines that it complies with current statutory criteria related to agency 
rulemaking authority.  
 
Legislative review.  State agencies must submit a list of economic impact rules to the General 
Assembly, the Office of Legislative Legal Services (OLLS), and the Secretary of State’s Office.  An 
economic impact rule does not take effect if a prior review committee decides whether to conduct a 
review of the bill.  A rule not selected by a prior review committee takes effect on the 22
nd
 day of the 
legislative session.  For a rule selected by a prior review committee, the agency must submit relevant 
records and the committee must consider whether the rule satisfies current statutory criteria related 
to the agency’s rulemaking authority and the need for the rule.  No later than 64 days after the start 
of the legislative session, a committee may: 
 
 vote to let the rule take effect immediately or upon a later date;  
 vote to void the rule because it exceeds the agency’s rulemaking authority or fails to meet statutory 
criteria; or  
 not take action.  If no action is taken, the rule is deemed effective on the 65
th
 day of the session.  
 
A prior review committee is: 
 
 the first assigned committee of reference for the bill that established the agency’s duty to 
promulgate rules, if the agency’s duty was established in legislation; or  
 the applicable committee of reference for each department’s SMART Act hearings.  
 
Exemptions.  The General Assembly may exempt in statute an economic impact rule from the prior 
review process.  Temporary or emergency rules are not subject to an economic impact determination 
or prior review process.  
Background 
Under current law, OLLS and state agencies use specified criteria in statute to review rules.  This bill 
also applies these criteria to the new processes for the review of rules by the Governor Office and prior 
review committees.  Current law criteria for reviewing rules include whether: 
 
  Page 3 
February 3, 2022   HB 22-1128  
 
 rules are within an agency’s statutory authorization; 
 rules are not deemed to be within statutory authorization just because the rule doesn’t conflict 
with state law;  
 the record of the rulemaking demonstrates the need for the regulation; 
 to the extent practicable, the rules are clearly and simply stated; 
 the rules do not conflict with other sections of law; and  
 any duplicative or overlapping rules are explained by the agency proposing the rule.  
State Revenue 
The bill may increase state revenue from business filing fees to the Department of State Cash Fund by 
a minimal amount to cover the additional expenditures required by the bill.  Filing fees are subject to 
TABOR.  Any change in fees will occur through regular fee setting processes.  
State Expenditures 
The bill increases state expenditures by $713,525 in FY 2022-23 and $701,108 in FY 2023-24 in the 
Governor’s Office, Secretary of State’s Office, and Department of Law.  Workload will also increase 
for all state agencies.  Costs are listed in Table 2 and discussed further below.  
 
Table 2 
Expenditures Under HB22-1128 
 
Cost Components 	FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 
Secretary of State   
Personal Services 	$7,949  $4,770  
Operating Expenses 	$0  	$0  
Capital Outlay Costs 	$0  	$0  
Computer Programming 	$46,080  	$0  
Centrally Appropriated Costs
1
 	$2,715  $1,429  
FTE – Personal Services 	0.2 FTE 0.1 FTE 
Dept. Subtotal 	$56,744  $6,199  
Governor's Office   
Personal Services 	$127,323  $169,764  
Operating Expenses 	$1,755  $2,025  
Capital Outlay Costs 	$12,400  	$0  
Centrally Appropriated Costs
1
 	$22,453  $30,270  
FTE – Personal Services 	1.1 FTE 1.5 FTE 
Dept. Subtotal 	$163,931  $202,059  
   Page 4 
February 3, 2022   HB 22-1128  
 
Table 2 
Expenditures Under HB22-1128 (Cont.) 
 
Department of Law   
Legal Services 	$492,850  $492,850  
FTE – Legal Services 	2.8 FTE 2.8 FTE 
Dept. Subtotal 	$492,850  $492,850  
Total $713,525  $701,108  
Total FTE 4.1 FTE 4.4 FTE 
1 
Centrally appropriated costs are not included in the bill's appropriation. 
 
Secretary of State.  The bill increases expenditures for the Secretary of State’s Office to modify the 
Code of Colorado Regulations filing system to accommodate the new processes.  One-time computer 
costs are expected to require 384 hours at a rate of $120 per hour.  The Secretary of State’s Office also 
requires 0.2 FTE in FY 2022-23 and 0.1 FTE in subsequent years to update rulemaking materials and 
monitor changes to the rulemaking processes.  Costs are prorated for a September start date, and paid 
out of the Department of State Cash Fund. 
 
Governor’s Office.  The Governor’s Office requires 1.5 FTE to review each new rule or rule change 
for compliance with the statutory criteria discussed in the background section.  An average of 
200 rules are expected per year.  The FTE is prorated for a September start date and the General Fund 
paydate shift in FY 2022-23.  
 
Department of Law.  The Department of Law requires 5,000 hours of legal services, to be split between 
state agencies as needed to support the rulemaking process and identification of economic impact 
rules.  Legal services are provided at a rate of $98.57 per hour.  The required hours are the equivalent 
of 2.8 FTE.  It is not known how these additional legal hours will be used among different state 
agencies, although the departments of Regulatory Agencies, Revenue, Public Health and 
Environment, Local Affairs, and Natural Resources are likely to use the bulk of the hours.  
 
All state agencies.  The bill increases workload for state agencies to identify economic impact rules 
and incorporate the analysis and prior review process into the rulemaking process.  The fiscal note 
assumes that initial workload associated with the new process will be incorporated in the current 
rulemaking processes.  Should agencies require additional resources, it will be requested through the 
annual budget process.  Some agencies are more likely to have a significant number of economic 
impact rules, and thus, have a more significant workload and potential cost increase.  These agencies 
include the departments of Regulatory Agencies, Revenue, Public Health and Environment, Natural 
Resources, and Local Affairs.  
 
   Page 5 
February 3, 2022   HB 22-1128  
 
Legislative Department.  The bill will increase workload for OLLS to review the economic impact 
rules for compliance with statutory criteria, as well as to support the prior review committees, 
potentially including written memoranda and presentations to the committees.  The workload 
increase will depend on the number and timing of the economic impact rules. The number of 
economic impact rules that a committee will take up is unknown.  OLLS will initially absorb the 
additional workload; this assumes that the workload for the new rules will be spread throughout the 
year.  However, should the number of rules exceed capacity, or should the rules be submitted entirely 
in November though January, OLLS will request additional resources through the budget process.  
 
The bill will also increase workload by a minimal amount for Legislative Council Staff to staff any 
additional committee hearings to consider economic impact rules.  The fiscal note assumes that there 
will be no change in legislative meeting or per diem costs.  No changes in appropriations are required.  
 
Centrally appropriated costs. Pursuant to a Joint Budget Committee policy, certain costs associated 
with this bill are addressed through the annual budget process and centrally appropriated in the Long 
Bill or supplemental appropriations bills, rather than in this bill.  These costs, which include employee 
insurance and supplemental employee retirement payments, are shown in Table 2. 
Other Budget Impacts 
General Fund reserve.  Under current law, an amount equal to 15 percent of General Fund 
appropriations must be set aside in the General Fund statutory reserve beginning in FY 2022-23.  Based 
on this fiscal note, the bill is expected to increase the amount of General Fund held in reserve by 
$95,149 in FY 2022-23 and $99,696 in FY 2023-24, which will decrease the amount of General Fund 
available for other purposes. 
Effective Date 
The bill takes effect 90 days following adjournment of the General Assembly sine die, assuming no 
referendum petition is filed. 
State Appropriations 
In FY 2022-23, the bill requires the follow appropriations:  
 
 $141,478 from the General Fund to the Governor’s Office, and 1.1 FTE; 
 $492,850 from the General Fund to the Department of Law, and 2.8 FTE; 
 $54,029 from the Department of State Cash Fund to the Secretary of State’s Office, and 0.2 FTE.  
Departmental Difference 
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment estimates that the bill will increase 
department expenditures by $2.6 million and 16.8 FTE beginning in FY 2022-23.  Staff increases are in 
the Air Pollution Control, Water Quality Control, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management, 
Disease Control and Public Health Response, and Health Facilities and Emergency Medical Services  Page 6 
February 3, 2022   HB 22-1128  
 
divisions to prepare economic impact analyses, support additional meetings of boards with 
rulemaking authority, and coordinate with the Governor’s Office and legislature.  Costs also include 
9,800 legal services hours provided by the Department of Law.  
 
The fiscal note does not include these costs for several reasons.  First, the fiscal note assumes that the 
determination of whether a rule is an economic impact rule and coordination with the legislature will 
be built into current rulemaking processes and will not require additional rulemaking hearings, or 
staff time at the level the department estimated.  In addition, the current rulemaking process already 
includes a process for interested parties to request an economic analysis of proposed rules; it is 
assumed that this detailed work could occur under current law, even with the addition of the 
economic impact rule determination under this bill.  Additionally, the fiscal note includes additional 
legal services, to be used by CDPHE or other agencies that require them, although at a lower level 
than estimated by the department. 
 
Given these assumptions and other uncertainty about the number of rules and reviews required, the 
fiscal note assumes that agencies should request additional resources through the budget process if 
costs and workload are higher than assumed in this fiscal note.  
State and Local Government Contacts 
All State Agencies 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The revenue and expenditure impacts in this fiscal note represent changes from current law under the bill for each 
fiscal year.  For additional information about fiscal notes, please visit:  leg.colorado.gov/fiscalnotes.