Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | + | Second Regular Session | |
2 | + | Seventy-third General Assembly | |
3 | + | STATE OF COLORADO | |
4 | + | REREVISED | |
5 | + | This Version Includes All Amendments | |
6 | + | Adopted in the Second House | |
7 | + | LLS NO. 22-0403.01 Brita Darling x2241 | |
1 | 8 | HOUSE BILL 22-1202 | |
2 | - | BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Herod and McCluskie, Kipp, Larson, Amabile, | |
3 | - | Bacon, Benavidez, Bernett, Bird, Boesenecker, Caraveo, Cutter, Duran, | |
4 | - | Esgar, Exum, Gonzales-Gutierrez, Gray, Jodeh, Kennedy, Lindsay, Lontine, | |
5 | - | McCormick, McLachlan, Michaelson Jenet, Mullica, Ricks, Roberts, Sirota, | |
6 | - | Snyder, Tipper, Titone, Valdez A., Valdez D., Weissman, Woodrow, | |
7 | - | Young; | |
8 | - | also SENATOR(S) Zenzinger and Coleman, Bridges, Kirkmeyer, Lundeen, | |
9 | - | Buckner, Donovan, Fields, Ginal, Gonzales, Hansen, Hinrichsen, | |
10 | - | Jaquez Lewis, Lee, Moreno, Pettersen, Rodriguez, Story, Winter, Fenberg. | |
9 | + | House Committees Senate Committees | |
10 | + | Education Education | |
11 | + | Appropriations Appropriations | |
12 | + | A BILL FOR AN ACT | |
11 | 13 | C | |
12 | - | ONCERNING THE CREATION OF A NEW MEASURE IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL | |
13 | - | FUNDING FORMULA FOR IDENTIFYING AT | |
14 | - | -RISK STUDENTS, AND, IN | |
15 | - | CONNECTION THEREWITH | |
16 | - | , CREATING A WORKING GROUP IN THE | |
17 | - | DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TO IMPLEMENT THE NEW MEASURE IN A | |
18 | - | FUTURE BUDGET YEAR AND MAKING AN APPROPRIATION | |
19 | - | . | |
20 | - | ||
21 | - | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: | |
22 | - | SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 22-54-104.6 as | |
23 | - | follows: | |
24 | - | 22-54-104.6. Implementation of at-risk measure - working group | |
25 | - | NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative | |
26 | - | officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill | |
27 | - | or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative | |
28 | - | history, or the Session Laws. | |
29 | - | ________ | |
30 | - | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes | |
31 | - | through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of | |
32 | - | the act. - creation - report - legislative declaration - definitions - repeal. | |
14 | + | ONCERNING THE CREATION OF A NEW MEASURE IN THE PUBLIC101 | |
15 | + | SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA FOR IDENTIFYING AT -RISK102 | |
16 | + | STUDENTS, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH , CREATING A103 | |
17 | + | WORKING GROUP IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TO104 | |
18 | + | IMPLEMENT THE NEW MEASURE IN A FUTURE BUDGET | |
19 | + | YEAR AND105 | |
20 | + | MAKING AN APPROPRIATION .106 | |
21 | + | Bill Summary | |
22 | + | (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does | |
23 | + | not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill | |
24 | + | passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that | |
25 | + | applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at | |
26 | + | http://leg.colorado.gov | |
27 | + | .) | |
28 | + | Legislative Interim Committee on School Finance. The bill | |
29 | + | SENATE | |
30 | + | 3rd Reading Unamended | |
31 | + | April 11, 2022 | |
32 | + | SENATE | |
33 | + | 2nd Reading Unamended | |
34 | + | April 8, 2022 | |
35 | + | HOUSE | |
36 | + | 3rd Reading Unamended | |
37 | + | March 21, 2022 | |
38 | + | HOUSE | |
39 | + | Amended 2nd Reading | |
40 | + | March 18, 2022 | |
41 | + | HOUSE SPONSORSHIP | |
42 | + | Herod and McCluskie, Kipp, Larson, Amabile, Bacon, Benavidez, Bernett, Bird, | |
43 | + | Boesenecker, Caraveo, Cutter, Duran, Esgar, Exum, Gonzales-Gutierrez, Gray, Jodeh, | |
44 | + | Kennedy, Lindsay, Lontine, McCormick, McLachlan, Michaelson Jenet, Mullica, Ricks, | |
45 | + | Roberts, Sirota, Snyder, Tipper, Titone, Valdez A., Valdez D., Weissman, Woodrow, Young | |
46 | + | SENATE SPONSORSHIP | |
47 | + | Zenzinger and Coleman, Bridges, Kirkmeyer, Lundeen, Buckner, Donovan, Fenberg, | |
48 | + | Fields, Ginal, Gonzales, Hansen, Hinrichsen, Jaquez Lewis, Lee, Moreno, Pettersen, | |
49 | + | Rodriguez, Story, Winter | |
50 | + | Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. | |
51 | + | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law. | |
52 | + | Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law. identifies a new at-risk measure to identify students who are at risk of | |
53 | + | below-average academic outcomes because of socioeconomic | |
54 | + | disadvantage or poverty in order to allocate resources through the state's | |
55 | + | public school funding formula to serve those students. The new at-risk | |
56 | + | measure will include: | |
57 | + | ! The percentage of students certified as eligible for the | |
58 | + | school lunch program based on documentation of benefit | |
59 | + | receipt or categorical eligibility, supplemented by the | |
60 | + | expansion of direct certification to participants in the | |
61 | + | medical assistance program and the children's basic health | |
62 | + | plan; and | |
63 | + | ! A neighborhood socioeconomic-status index that weights | |
64 | + | student needs based on socioeconomic-status index | |
65 | + | neighborhood factors linked to each student's census block | |
66 | + | group. | |
67 | + | The commissioner of education (commissioner) shall convene a | |
68 | + | working group to prepare for the implementation of the new at-risk | |
69 | + | measure in the 2023-24 budget year. The bill specifies the membership | |
70 | + | of the working group. | |
71 | + | The bill includes issues that the working group may consider in | |
72 | + | constructing and implementing the new at-risk measure, including | |
73 | + | collecting necessary data, constructing a neighborhood | |
74 | + | socioeconomic-status index linked to students' addresses, and testing the | |
75 | + | at-risk measure with actual student data, if available. | |
76 | + | The commissioner shall report findings and recommendations for | |
77 | + | the construction and implementation of the new at-risk measure to the | |
78 | + | legislative interim committee on school finance, the joint budget | |
79 | + | committee, and the education committees of the general assembly. | |
80 | + | The bill requires the department of education to apply to the | |
81 | + | United States department of agriculture to obtain authorization for direct | |
82 | + | certification of students participating in the medical assistance program | |
83 | + | and the children's basic health plan. | |
84 | + | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1 | |
85 | + | SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 22-54-104.6 as2 | |
86 | + | follows:3 | |
87 | + | 22-54-104.6. Implementation of at-risk measure - working4 | |
88 | + | group - creation - report - legislative declaration - definitions - repeal.5 | |
33 | 89 | (1) (a) T | |
34 | - | HE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT IMPLEMENTING | |
35 | - | A NEW AT | |
36 | - | -RISK MEASURE FOR IDENTIFYING STUDENTS WHO ARE AT RISK OF | |
37 | - | BELOW | |
38 | - | -AVERAGE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE BECAUSE OF SOCIOECONOMIC | |
39 | - | DISADVANTAGES OR POVERTY WILL BENEFIT | |
40 | - | COLORADO STUDENTS BY: | |
90 | + | HE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT6 | |
91 | + | IMPLEMENTING A NEW AT-RISK MEASURE FOR IDENTIFYING STUDENTS WHO7 | |
92 | + | 1202-2- ARE AT RISK OF BELOW-AVERAGE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE BECAUSE OF1 | |
93 | + | SOCIOECONOMIC DISADVANTAGES OR POVERTY WILL BENEFIT COLORADO2 | |
94 | + | STUDENTS BY:3 | |
41 | 95 | (I) E | |
42 | - | NSURING THAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN | |
43 | - | UNIVERSAL FREE MEALS PROGRAMS AND REDUCING THE PAPERWORK AND | |
44 | - | ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS PARTICIPATING IN THOSE | |
45 | - | PROGRAMS | |
46 | - | ; | |
96 | + | NSURING THAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN4 | |
97 | + | UNIVERSAL FREE MEALS PROGRAMS AND REDUCING THE PAPERWORK AND5 | |
98 | + | ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS PARTICIPATING IN THOSE6 | |
99 | + | PROGRAMS;7 | |
47 | 100 | (II) I | |
48 | - | DENTIFYING AT-RISK STUDENTS DIRECTLY THROUGH THEIR | |
49 | - | PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN PUBLIC BENEFIT PROGRAMS WITHOUT THE NEED | |
50 | - | TO COLLECT FORMS OR OTHER VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY | |
51 | - | , WHICH OFTEN | |
52 | - | LEADS TO THE UNDERCOUNTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS THAT | |
53 | - | NEED RESOURCES TO SERVE THESE STUDENTS | |
54 | - | ; AND | |
55 | - | (III) RECOGNIZING FACTORS BEYOND HOUSEHOLD INCOME THAT | |
56 | - | PLACE A STUDENT AT RISK OF BELOW | |
57 | - | -AVERAGE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE . | |
101 | + | DENTIFYING AT-RISK STUDENTS DIRECTLY THROUGH THEIR8 | |
102 | + | PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN PUBLIC BENEFIT PROGRAMS WITHOUT THE9 | |
103 | + | NEED TO COLLECT FORMS OR OTHER VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY , WHICH10 | |
104 | + | OFTEN LEADS TO THE UNDERCOUNTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PUBLIC11 | |
105 | + | SCHOOLS THAT NEED RESOURCES TO SERVE THESE STUDENTS ; AND12 | |
106 | + | (III) R | |
107 | + | ECOGNIZING FACTORS BEYOND HOUSEHOLD INCOME THAT13 | |
108 | + | PLACE A STUDENT AT RISK OF BELOW-AVERAGE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE .14 | |
58 | 109 | (b) T | |
59 | - | HEREFORE, IT IS THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO | |
60 | - | CREATE A WORKING GROUP CONVENED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF | |
61 | - | EDUCATION TO DETERMINE HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND IMPLEMENT THE NEW | |
62 | - | AT | |
63 | - | -RISK MEASURE FOR USE IN THE STATE 'S PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING | |
64 | - | FORMULA | |
65 | - | . | |
110 | + | HEREFORE, IT IS THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO15 | |
111 | + | CREATE A WORKING GROUP CONVENED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF16 | |
112 | + | EDUCATION TO DETERMINE HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND IMPLEMENT THE NEW17 | |
113 | + | AT-RISK MEASURE FOR USE IN THE STATE 'S PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING18 | |
114 | + | FORMULA.19 | |
66 | 115 | (2) | |
67 | - | AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE | |
68 | - | REQUIRES | |
69 | - | : | |
116 | + | AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE20 | |
117 | + | REQUIRES:21 | |
70 | 118 | (a) "C | |
71 | - | HILDREN'S BASIC HEALTH PLAN" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS | |
72 | - | SET FORTH IN SECTION | |
73 | - | 25.5-8-103. | |
119 | + | HILDREN'S BASIC HEALTH PLAN" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS22 | |
120 | + | SET FORTH IN SECTION 25.5-8-103.23 | |
74 | 121 | (b) "C | |
75 | - | OMMISSIONER" MEANS THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION | |
76 | - | APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SECTION | |
77 | - | 1 OF ARTICLE IX OF THE STATE | |
78 | - | CONSTITUTION | |
79 | - | . | |
122 | + | OMMISSIONER" MEANS THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION24 | |
123 | + | APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1 OF ARTICLE IX OF THE STATE25 | |
124 | + | CONSTITUTION.26 | |
80 | 125 | (c) "I | |
81 | - | DENTIFIED STUDENT PERCENTAGE" MEANS THE PERCENTAGE OF | |
82 | - | A DISTRICT | |
83 | - | 'S OR INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL'S STUDENT ENROLLMENT WHO | |
84 | - | ARE CERTIFIED AS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE MEALS UNDER THE SCHOOL LUNCH | |
85 | - | PROGRAM BASED ON DOCUMENTATION OF BENEFIT RECEIPT OR CATEGORICAL | |
86 | - | PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 ELIGIBILITY AS DESCRIBED IN 7 CFR 245.6, OR ANY SUCCESSOR | |
87 | - | REGULATIONS | |
88 | - | . | |
126 | + | DENTIFIED STUDENT PERCENTAGE " MEANS THE PERCENTAGE27 | |
127 | + | 1202 | |
128 | + | -3- OF A DISTRICT'S OR INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL'S STUDENT ENROLLMENT1 | |
129 | + | WHO ARE CERTIFIED AS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE MEALS UNDER THE SCHOOL2 | |
130 | + | LUNCH PROGRAM BASED ON DOCUMENTATION OF BENEFIT RECEIPT OR3 | |
131 | + | CATEGORICAL ELIGIBILITY AS DESCRIBED IN 7 CFR 245.6, OR ANY4 | |
132 | + | SUCCESSOR REGULATIONS.5 | |
89 | 133 | (d) "M | |
90 | - | EDICAID" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS " | |
91 | - | AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 25.5-4-103. | |
134 | + | EDICAID" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS "MEDICAL6 | |
135 | + | ASSISTANCE" AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 25.5-4-103.7 | |
92 | 136 | (e) "S | |
93 | - | CHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM " MEANS THE FEDERAL "RICHARD B. | |
137 | + | CHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM " MEANS THE FEDERAL "RICHARD B.8 | |
94 | 138 | R | |
95 | - | USSELL NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH ACT" CREATED IN 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1751, | |
96 | - | ET SEQ. | |
139 | + | USSELL NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH ACT" CREATED IN 42 U.S.C. SEC.9 | |
140 | + | 1751, | |
141 | + | ET SEQ.10 | |
97 | 142 | (3) B | |
98 | - | EGINNING IN THE 2023-24 BUDGET YEAR, THERE IS CREATED A | |
99 | - | NEW AT | |
100 | - | -RISK MEASURE IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA FOR | |
101 | - | IDENTIFYING STUDENTS WHO ARE AT RISK OF BELOW | |
102 | - | -AVERAGE ACADEMIC | |
103 | - | OUTCOMES BECAUSE OF SOCIOECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE OR POVERTY | |
104 | - | . THE | |
105 | - | NEW AT | |
106 | - | -RISK MEASURE REPLACES THE AT-RISK MEASURE IN EFFECT FOR THE | |
107 | - | 2022-23 BUDGET YEAR. THE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE IS DESIGNED TO | |
108 | - | ALLOCATE FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO SERVE THE NEEDS | |
109 | - | OF AT | |
110 | - | -RISK STUDENTS. THE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE INCLUDES: | |
143 | + | EGINNING IN THE 2023-24 BUDGET YEAR, THERE IS CREATED11 | |
144 | + | A NEW AT-RISK MEASURE IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA FOR12 | |
145 | + | IDENTIFYING STUDENTS WHO ARE AT RISK OF BELOW -AVERAGE ACADEMIC13 | |
146 | + | OUTCOMES BECAUSE OF SOCIOECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE OR POVERTY .14 | |
147 | + | T | |
148 | + | HE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE REPLACES THE AT-RISK MEASURE IN EFFECT15 | |
149 | + | FOR THE 2022-23 BUDGET YEAR. THE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE IS DESIGNED16 | |
150 | + | TO ALLOCATE FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO SERVE THE17 | |
151 | + | NEEDS OF AT-RISK STUDENTS. THE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE INCLUDES:18 | |
111 | 152 | (a) A | |
112 | - | DISTRICT'S OR INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL 'S IDENTIFIED | |
113 | - | STUDENT PERCENTAGE | |
114 | - | , SUPPLEMENTED BY STUDENTS IDENTIFIED THROUGH | |
115 | - | COLORADO'S PARTICIPATION IN THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT OPERATED | |
116 | - | PURSUANT TO | |
117 | - | 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1758 (b)(15) FOR DIRECT CERTIFICATION FOR | |
118 | - | CHILDREN RECEIVING BENEFITS THROUGH MEDICAID AND THE CHILDREN | |
119 | - | 'S | |
120 | - | BASIC HEALTH PLAN | |
121 | - | ; AND | |
122 | - | (b) STUDENT NEEDS THAT ARE WEIGHTED BASED ON AT LEAST FIVE | |
123 | - | SOCIOECONOMIC | |
124 | - | -STATUS NEIGHBORHOOD FACTORS , LINKED TO EACH | |
125 | - | STUDENT | |
126 | - | 'S CENSUS BLOCK GROUP. | |
127 | - | (4) O | |
128 | - | N OR BEFORE AUGUST 15, 2022, THE COMMISSIONER SHALL | |
129 | - | CONVENE A WORKING GROUP TO PREPARE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION IN THE | |
130 | - | 2023-24 BUDGET YEAR OF THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE CREATED IN | |
131 | - | SUBSECTION | |
132 | - | (3) OF THIS SECTION. | |
153 | + | DISTRICT'S OR INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL 'S IDENTIFIED19 | |
154 | + | STUDENT PERCENTAGE , SUPPLEMENTED BY STUDENTS IDENTIFIED20 | |
155 | + | THROUGH COLORADO'S PARTICIPATION IN THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT21 | |
156 | + | OPERATED PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1758 (b)(15) FOR DIRECT22 | |
157 | + | CERTIFICATION FOR CHILDREN RECEIVING BENEFITS THROUGH MEDICAID23 | |
158 | + | AND THE CHILDREN'S BASIC HEALTH PLAN; AND24 | |
159 | + | (b) S | |
160 | + | TUDENT NEEDS THAT ARE WEIGHTED BASED ON AT LEAST FIVE25 | |
161 | + | SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS NEIGHBORHOOD FACTORS , LINKED TO EACH26 | |
162 | + | STUDENT'S CENSUS BLOCK GROUP.27 | |
163 | + | 1202 | |
164 | + | -4- (4) ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 15, 2022, THE COMMISSIONER SHALL1 | |
165 | + | CONVENE A WORKING GROUP TO PREPARE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION IN2 | |
166 | + | THE 2023-24 BUDGET YEAR OF THE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE CREATED IN3 | |
167 | + | SUBSECTION (3) OF THIS SECTION.4 | |
133 | 168 | (5) (a) T | |
134 | - | HE WORKING GROUP CONSISTS OF STAFF OF THE | |
135 | - | DEPARTMENTS OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING AND HUMAN | |
136 | - | SERVICES | |
137 | - | , APPOINTED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS OF THOSE | |
138 | - | DEPARTMENTS IN CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER | |
139 | - | , AND OTHER | |
140 | - | MEMBERS APPOINTED BY THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION | |
141 | - | PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 (5)(b) OF THIS SECTION. EACH APPOINTING AUTHORITY SHALL APPOINT | |
142 | - | WORKING GROUP MEMBERS ON OR BEFORE | |
143 | - | AUGUST 1, 2022. | |
169 | + | HE WORKING GROUP CONSISTS OF STAFF OF THE5 | |
170 | + | DEPARTMENTS OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING AND HUMAN6 | |
171 | + | SERVICES, APPOINTED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS OF THOSE7 | |
172 | + | DEPARTMENTS IN CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER , AND OTHER8 | |
173 | + | MEMBERS APPOINTED BY THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION9 | |
174 | + | (5)(b) | |
175 | + | OF THIS SECTION. EACH APPOINTING AUTHORITY SHALL APPOINT10 | |
176 | + | WORKING GROUP MEMBERS ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 1, 2022.11 | |
144 | 177 | (b) T | |
145 | - | HE COMMISSIONER SHALL APPOINT MEMBERS TO | |
146 | - | GROUP TO PROVIDE REPRESENTATION FOR THE | |
147 | - | : | |
178 | + | HE COMMISSIONER SHALL APPOINT MEMBERS TO THE12 | |
179 | + | WORKING GROUP TO PROVIDE REPRESENTATION FOR THE FOLLOWING13 | |
180 | + | GROUPS:14 | |
148 | 181 | (I) S | |
149 | - | TAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ; | |
182 | + | TAFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ;15 | |
150 | 183 | (II) S | |
151 | - | TAFF OF THE STATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE ; | |
184 | + | TAFF OF THE STATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE ;16 | |
152 | 185 | (III) D | |
153 | - | ISTRICT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS OR SC HOOL FINANCE | |
154 | - | DIRECTORS | |
155 | - | ; | |
186 | + | ISTRICT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS OR SCHOOL FI NANCE17 | |
187 | + | DIRECTORS;18 | |
156 | 188 | (IV) S | |
157 | - | UPERINTENDENTS OF DISTRICTS; | |
189 | + | UPERINTENDENTS OF DISTRICTS;19 | |
158 | 190 | (V) S | |
159 | - | CHOOL PRINCIPALS AND DIRECTORS OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ; | |
191 | + | CHOOL PRINCIPALS AND DIRECTORS OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ;20 | |
160 | 192 | (VI) S | |
161 | - | CHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS OR NURSES ; | |
193 | + | CHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS OR NURSES ;21 | |
162 | 194 | (VII) C | |
163 | - | HILD WELFARE EDUCATION LIAISONS ; | |
195 | + | HILD WELFARE EDUCATION LIAISONS ;22 | |
164 | 196 | (VIII) T | |
165 | - | HE EDUCATION DATA ADVISORY COMMITTEE CREATED IN | |
166 | - | SECTION | |
167 | - | 22-2-304; | |
197 | + | HE EDUCATION DATA ADVISORY COMMITTEE CREATED IN23 | |
198 | + | SECTION 22-2-304;24 | |
168 | 199 | (IX) A | |
169 | - | STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS EDUCATORS ; | |
200 | + | STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS EDUCATORS ;25 | |
170 | 201 | (X) A | |
171 | - | STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS SCHOOL | |
172 | - | DISTRICT BOARDS OF EDUCATION | |
173 | - | ; | |
174 | - | (XI) A | |
175 | - | STATEWIDE ADVOCACY GROUP FOR CHARTER SCHOOLS ; | |
202 | + | STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS SCHOOL26 | |
203 | + | DISTRICT BOARDS OF EDUCATION;27 | |
204 | + | 1202 | |
205 | + | -5- (XI) A STATEWIDE ADVOCACY GROUP FOR CHARTER SCHOOLS ;1 | |
176 | 206 | (XII) A | |
177 | - | N ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS RURAL | |
178 | - | DISTRICTS | |
179 | - | ; | |
180 | - | (XIII) A | |
181 | - | STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS PARENTS ; | |
182 | - | (XIV) | |
183 | - | A STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS SCHOOL | |
184 | - | NUTRITION SERVICE PROVIDERS | |
185 | - | ; | |
186 | - | (XV) A | |
187 | - | DVOCACY GROUPS FOR CHILDREN IN POVERTY ; | |
188 | - | PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 (XVI) ADVOCACY GROUPS WORKING TO END HUNGER IN COLORADO; | |
189 | - | AND | |
190 | - | (XVII) ANY OTHER GROUPS WITH RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS OR | |
191 | - | EXPERTISE | |
192 | - | . | |
207 | + | N ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS RURAL2 | |
208 | + | DISTRICTS;3 (XIII) A STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS PARENTS;4 | |
209 | + | (XIV) A STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION THAT REPRESENTS SCHOOL5 | |
210 | + | NUTRITION SERVICE PROVIDERS;6 | |
211 | + | (XV) ADVOCACY GROUPS FOR CHILDREN IN POVERTY ;7 | |
212 | + | (XVI) ADVOCACY GROUPS WORKING TO END HUNGER IN8 | |
213 | + | C | |
214 | + | OLORADO; AND9 (XVII) ANY OTHER GROUPS WITH RELEVANT QUALIFICATIONS OR10 | |
215 | + | EXPERTISE.11 | |
193 | 216 | (6) I | |
194 | - | N APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE WORKING GROUP , THE | |
195 | - | COMMISSIONER SHALL ENSURE | |
196 | - | , TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, THAT THE | |
197 | - | MEMBERSHIP REFLECTS THE GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY OF THE STATE | |
198 | - | , | |
199 | - | INCLUDING MEMBERS FROM RURAL , URBAN, AND SUBURBAN DISTRICTS AND | |
200 | - | CHARTER SCHOOLS | |
201 | - | , AS WELL AS LARGE AND SMALL DISTRICTS . THE | |
202 | - | COMMISSIONER SHALL ALSO ENSURE REPRESENTATION FROM DISTRICTS THAT | |
203 | - | SERVE A HIGH NUMBER OF AT | |
204 | - | -RISK STUDENTS UNDER THE CURRENT SCHOOL | |
205 | - | FUNDING FORMULA | |
206 | - | . | |
217 | + | N APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE WORKING GROUP , THE12 | |
218 | + | COMMISSIONER SHALL ENSURE , TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, THAT THE13 | |
219 | + | MEMBERSHIP REFLECTS THE GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY OF THE STATE ,14 | |
220 | + | INCLUDING MEMBERS FROM RURAL , URBAN, AND SUBURBAN DISTRICTS15 | |
221 | + | AND CHARTER SCHOOLS, AS WELL AS LARGE AND SMALL DISTRICTS . THE16 | |
222 | + | COMMISSIONER SHALL ALSO ENSURE REPRESENTATION FROM DISTRICTS17 | |
223 | + | THAT SERVE A HIGH NUMBER OF AT-RISK STUDENTS UNDER THE CURRENT18 | |
224 | + | SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA .19 | |
207 | 225 | (7) T | |
208 | - | HE COMMISSIONER, OR A MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE | |
209 | - | COMMISSIONER | |
210 | - | , SHALL SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE WORKING GROUP. MEMBERS | |
211 | - | OF THE WORKING GROUP SERVE WITHOUT COMPENSATION AND WITHOUT | |
212 | - | REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES | |
213 | - | . | |
226 | + | HE COMMISSIONER, OR A MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE20 | |
227 | + | COMMISSIONER, SHALL SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE WORKING GROUP .21 | |
228 | + | M | |
229 | + | EMBERS OF THE WORKING GROUP SERVE WITHOUT COMPENSATION AND22 | |
230 | + | WITHOUT REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES .23 | |
214 | 231 | (8) T | |
215 | - | HE COMMISSIONER, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE | |
216 | - | DIRECTORS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF HEALTH CARE POLICY | |
217 | - | AND HUMAN SERVICES | |
218 | - | ||
219 | - | ||
220 | - | EXPERTISE | |
221 | - | ||
232 | + | HE COMMISSIONER, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE EXECUTIVE24 | |
233 | + | DIRECTORS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND25 | |
234 | + | FINANCING AND HUMAN SERVICES , MAY FORM ISSUE SUBGROUPS ,26 | |
235 | + | CONSISTING OF WORKING GROUP MEMBERS AND OTHERS WITH RELEVANT27 | |
236 | + | 1202 | |
237 | + | -6- EXPERIENCE OR EXPERTISE, TO CONSIDER THE ISSUES ADDRESSED BY THE1 | |
238 | + | WORKING GROUP.2 | |
222 | 239 | (9) T | |
223 | - | HE WORKING GROUP SHALL ADDRESS ISSUES CONCERNING THE | |
224 | - | CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW AT | |
225 | - | -RISK MEASURE | |
226 | - | CREATED IN SUBSECTION | |
227 | - | (3) OF THIS SECTION . AMONG OTHER | |
228 | - | CONSIDERATIONS | |
229 | - | , THE CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW | |
230 | - | AT | |
231 | - | -RISK MEASURE MAY INCLUDE: | |
240 | + | HE WORKING GROUP SHALL ADDRESS ISSUES CONCERNING THE3 | |
241 | + | CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE4 | |
242 | + | CREATED IN SUBSECTION (3) OF THIS SECTION. AMONG OTHER5 | |
243 | + | CONSIDERATIONS, THE CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW6 | |
244 | + | AT-RISK MEASURE MAY INCLUDE:7 | |
232 | 245 | (a) C | |
233 | - | OLLECTING THE NECESSARY DATA TO IMPLEMENT THE NEW | |
234 | - | AT | |
235 | - | -RISK MEASURE, WHICH MAY INCLUDE CONSIDERATION OF A SURVEY OF | |
236 | - | AVAILABLE DATA | |
237 | - | , THE LEVEL AT WHICH DATA IS COLLECTED, DATA SHARING | |
238 | - | AND DATA LINKS | |
239 | - | , STUDENT DATA PRIVACY, AND MINIMIZING THE BURDEN OF | |
240 | - | DATA COLLECTION | |
241 | - | ; | |
246 | + | OLLECTING THE NECESSARY DATA TO IMPLEMENT THE NEW8 | |
247 | + | AT-RISK MEASURE, WHICH MAY INCLUDE CONSIDERATION OF A SURVEY OF9 | |
248 | + | AVAILABLE DATA, THE LEVEL AT WHICH DATA IS COLLECTED , DATA10 | |
249 | + | SHARING AND DATA LINKS, STUDENT DATA PRIVACY, AND MINIMIZING THE11 | |
250 | + | BURDEN OF DATA COLLECTION ;12 | |
242 | 251 | (b) D | |
243 | - | EVELOPING THE NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOECONOMIC -STATUS | |
244 | - | INDEX | |
245 | - | , INCLUDING THE DETERMINATION OF FIVE OR MORE INDEX FACTORS , | |
246 | - | PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 WHICH MAY INCLUDE MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME , HOMEOWNERSHIP RATE, | |
247 | - | THE PERCENTAGE OF ADULTS TWENTY -FIVE YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WITH | |
248 | - | A BACHELOR | |
249 | - | 'S DEGREE OR HIGHER, THE PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN WHO ARE | |
250 | - | FOSTERED OR RAISED BY A NONPARENTAL RELATIVE | |
251 | - | , OR THE PERCENTAGE | |
252 | - | OF HOUSEHOLDS WHERE A NON | |
253 | - | -ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS SPOKEN; | |
252 | + | EVELOPING THE NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOECONOMIC -STATUS13 | |
253 | + | INDEX, INCLUDING THE DETERMINATION OF FIVE OR MORE INDEX FACTORS ,14 | |
254 | + | WHICH MAY INCLUDE MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME , HOMEOWNERSHIP15 | |
255 | + | RATE, THE PERCENTAGE OF ADULTS TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER16 | |
256 | + | WITH A BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR HIGHER, THE PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN17 | |
257 | + | WHO ARE FOSTERED OR RAISED BY A NONPARENTAL RELATIVE , OR THE18 | |
258 | + | PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS WHERE A NON -ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS19 | |
259 | + | SPOKEN;20 | |
254 | 260 | (c) O | |
255 | - | NCE CENSUS BLOCKS ARE ASSIGNED A SOCIOECONOMIC -STATUS | |
256 | - | INDEX VALUE | |
257 | - | , DETERMINING HOW A STUDENT 'S NEIGHBORHOOD | |
258 | - | SOCIOECONOMIC | |
259 | - | -STATUS INDEX VALUE SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE | |
260 | - | AT | |
261 | - | -RISK MEASURE AND HOW IT WILL IMPACT STUDENTS IDENTIFIED AS PART | |
262 | - | OF THE DISTRICT | |
263 | - | 'S OR INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL'S IDENTIFIED STUDENT | |
264 | - | PERCENTAGE | |
265 | - | ; | |
261 | + | NCE CENSUS BLOCKS ARE ASSIGNED A21 | |
262 | + | SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS INDEX VALUE, DETERMINING HOW A STUDENT'S22 | |
263 | + | NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOEC ONOMIC -STATUS INDEX VALUE SHOULD BE23 | |
264 | + | INCORPORATED INTO THE AT-RISK MEASURE AND HOW IT WILL IMPACT24 | |
265 | + | STUDENTS IDENTIFIED AS PART OF THE DISTRICT'S OR INSTITUTE CHARTER25 | |
266 | + | SCHOOL'S IDENTIFIED STUDENT PERCENTAGE;26 | |
266 | 267 | (d) D | |
267 | - | ETERMINING THE COMPOSITION OF AT -RISK FACTOR FUNDING | |
268 | - | BASED ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS THROUGH THE NEW AT | |
269 | - | -RISK | |
270 | - | MEASURE AND ENSURING THAT AT | |
271 | - | -RISK FACTOR FUNDING IS EQUITABLY | |
272 | - | DISTRIBUTED TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC OUTCOMES FOR IDENTIFIED STUDENTS | |
273 | - | ; | |
268 | + | ETERMINING THE COMPOSITION OF AT-RISK FACTOR FUNDING27 | |
269 | + | 1202 | |
270 | + | -7- BASED ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS THROUGH THE NEW AT -RISK1 | |
271 | + | MEASURE AND ENSURING THAT AT -RISK FACTOR FUNDING IS EQUITABLY2 | |
272 | + | DISTRIBUTED TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC OUTCOMES FOR IDENTIFIED3 | |
273 | + | STUDENTS;4 | |
274 | 274 | (e) D | |
275 | - | ETERMINING HOW DISTRICTS AND INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOLS | |
276 | - | WILL DEMONSTRATE THAT AT | |
277 | - | -RISK FUNDING IS BEING EXPENDED TO SERVE | |
278 | - | STUDENTS IDENTIFIED THROUGH THE NEW AT | |
279 | - | -RISK MEASURE AND RESULTING | |
280 | - | AT | |
281 | - | -RISK FACTOR FUNDING; | |
275 | + | ETERMINING HOW DISTRICTS AND INSTITUTE CHARTER5 | |
276 | + | SCHOOLS WILL DEMONSTRATE THAT AT -RISK FUNDING IS BEING EXPENDED6 | |
277 | + | TO SERVE STUDENTS IDENTIFIED THROUGH THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE7 | |
278 | + | AND RESULTING AT-RISK FACTOR FUNDING;8 | |
282 | 279 | (f) D | |
283 | - | ETERMINING THE PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING | |
284 | - | THE FIRST YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION AND THE DESIGN | |
285 | - | HOLD | |
286 | - | ||
280 | + | ETERMINING THE PROCESS FOR IDENTIFYING STUDENTS9 | |
281 | + | DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION AND THE DESIGN AND10 | |
282 | + | LENGTH OF A HOLD-HARMLESS PROVISION FOR DISTRICTS AND CHARTER11 | |
283 | + | SCHOOLS;12 | |
287 | 284 | (g) C | |
288 | - | ONDUCTING PRE-IMPLEMENTATION MODELING AND TESTING | |
289 | - | USING ACTUAL STUDENT DATA FOR EACH DISTRICT AND CHARTER SCHOOL | |
290 | - | , | |
291 | - | IF AVAILABLE; | |
285 | + | ONDUCTING PRE-IMPLEMENTATION MODELING AND TESTING13 | |
286 | + | USING ACTUAL STUDENT DATA FOR EACH DISTRICT AND CHARTER SC HOOL ,14 | |
287 | + | IF AVAILABLE;15 | |
292 | 288 | (h) C | |
293 | - | ONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE | |
294 | - | OTHER PROGRAMS THAT RELY ON OR REFERENCE THE IDENTIFICATION | |
295 | - | AT | |
296 | - | ||
297 | - | ||
289 | + | ONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE ON16 | |
290 | + | OTHER PROGRAMS THAT RELY ON OR REFERENCE THE IDENTIFICATION OF17 | |
291 | + | AT-RISK STUDENTS PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 54; AND18 | |
292 | + | (i) A | |
293 | + | NY OTHER ISSUES DEEMED RELEVANT BY THE COMMISSIONER .19 | |
298 | 294 | (10) | |
299 | - | NOT LATER THAN JANUARY 31, 2023, THE COMMISSIONER SHALL | |
300 | - | SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE LEGISLATIVE INTERIM COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL | |
301 | - | FINANCE | |
302 | - | , THE JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE, AND THE EDUCATION COMMITTEES | |
303 | - | PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE , OR ANY SUCCESSOR | |
304 | - | COMMITTEES | |
305 | - | , INCLUDING: | |
295 | + | NOT LATER THAN JANUARY 31, 2023, THE COMMISSIONER20 | |
296 | + | SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE LEGISLATIVE INTERIM COMMITTEE ON21 | |
297 | + | SCHOOL FINANCE, THE JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE, AND THE EDUCATION22 | |
298 | + | COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE , OR23 | |
299 | + | ANY SUCCESSOR COMMITTEES , INCLUDING:24 | |
306 | 300 | (a) A | |
307 | - | SUMMARY OF THE PROGRESS OF THE WORKING GROUP IN | |
308 | - | RESOLVING ISSUES CONCERNING THE COMPOSITION AND IMPLEMENTATION | |
309 | - | OF THE NEW AT | |
310 | - | -RISK MEASURE AND AT-RISK FACTOR FUNDING; | |
311 | - | (b) F | |
312 | - | INDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE WORKING GROUP FOR | |
313 | - | IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW AT | |
314 | - | -RISK MEASURE FOR THE 2023-24 BUDGET | |
315 | - | YEAR | |
316 | - | , INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANY LEGISLATION NECESSARY TO | |
317 | - | IMPLEMENT THE NEW AT | |
318 | - | -RISK MEASURE, AS WELL AS FINANCIAL RESOURCES | |
319 | - | NEEDED TO ADMINISTER THE NEW AT | |
320 | - | -RISK MEASURE; | |
301 | + | SUMMARY OF THE PROGRESS OF THE WORKING GROUP IN25 | |
302 | + | RESOLVING ISSUES CONCERNING THE COMPOSITION AND IMPLEMENTATION26 | |
303 | + | OF THE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE AND AT-RISK FACTOR FUNDING;27 | |
304 | + | 1202 | |
305 | + | -8- (b) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE WORKING GROUP1 | |
306 | + | FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE FOR THE 2023-242 | |
307 | + | BUDGET YEAR, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANY LEGISLATION3 | |
308 | + | NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE, AS WELL AS4 | |
309 | + | FINANCIAL RESOURCES NEEDED TO ADMINISTER THE NEW AT -RISK5 | |
310 | + | MEASURE;6 | |
321 | 311 | (c) A | |
322 | - | SUMMARY OF ANY FINANCIAL MODELING OF THE NEW AT -RISK | |
323 | - | MEASURE FOR INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS OR CHARTER SCHOOLS | |
324 | - | , IF AVAILABLE; | |
325 | - | AND | |
326 | - | (d) AN ESTIMATE OF THE IMPACT OF THE NEW AT-RISK MEASURE ON | |
327 | - | THE COST OF TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING | |
328 | - | . | |
312 | + | SUMMARY OF ANY FINANCIAL MODELING OF THE NEW7 | |
313 | + | AT-RISK MEASURE FOR INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS OR CHARTER SCHOOLS , IF8 | |
314 | + | AVAILABLE; AND9 | |
315 | + | (d) A | |
316 | + | N ESTIMATE OF THE IMPACT OF THE NEW AT -RISK MEASURE10 | |
317 | + | ON THE COST OF TOTAL PROGRAM FUNDING .11 | |
329 | 318 | (11) T | |
330 | - | HE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL APPLY TO | |
331 | - | ||
332 | - | ||
333 | - | 42 U.S.C. SEC. | |
319 | + | HE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL APPLY TO THE12 | |
320 | + | U | |
321 | + | NITED STATES SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE13 | |
322 | + | DEMONSTRATION PROJECT OPERATED PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. SEC. 175814 | |
334 | 323 | (b)(15) | |
335 | - | FOR DIRECT CERTIFICATION FOR CHILDREN RECEIVING MEDICAID | |
336 | - | BENEFITS | |
337 | - | , WITH THE INTENT THAT THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT IS | |
338 | - | IMPLEMENTED STATEWIDE TO THE EXTENT ALLOWABLE UNDER FEDERAL | |
339 | - | LAW | |
340 | - | . IF THE STATE IS SELECTED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DEMONSTRATION | |
341 | - | PROJECT | |
342 | - | , THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE | |
343 | - | REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT | |
344 | - | , INCLUDING ENTERING | |
345 | - | INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND | |
346 | - | FINANCING TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES BY WHICH A STUDENT MAY BE | |
347 | - | CERTIFIED | |
348 | - | , WITHOUT FURTHER APPLICATION , AS MEETING THE ELIGIBILITY | |
349 | - | REQUIREMENTS FOR FREE OR REDUCED | |
350 | - | -PRICE MEALS PURSUANT TO THE | |
351 | - | NATIONAL SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM AND THE NATIONAL SCHOOL | |
352 | - | LUNCH PROGRAM BASED ON INFORMATION COLLECTED BY THE DEPARTMENT | |
353 | - | OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING IN IMPLEMENTING THE MEDICAID | |
354 | - | PROGRAM | |
355 | - | . | |
324 | + | FOR DIRECT CERTIFICATION FOR CHILDREN RECEIVING MEDICAID15 | |
325 | + | BENEFITS, WITH THE INTENT THAT THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT IS16 | |
326 | + | IMPLEMENTED STATEWIDE TO THE EXTENT ALLOWABLE UNDER FEDERAL17 | |
327 | + | LAW. IF THE STATE IS SELECTED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DEMONSTRATION18 | |
328 | + | PROJECT, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OF19 | |
329 | + | THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT , INCLUDING20 | |
330 | + | ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE21 | |
331 | + | POLICY AND FINANCING TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES BY WHICH A STUDENT22 | |
332 | + | MAY BE CERTIFIED, WITHOUT FURTHER APPLICATION , AS MEETING THE23 | |
333 | + | ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR FREE OR REDUCED -PRICE MEALS24 | |
334 | + | PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM AND THE25 | |
335 | + | NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM BASED ON INFORMATION COLLECTED26 | |
336 | + | BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING IN27 | |
337 | + | 1202 | |
338 | + | -9- IMPLEMENTING THE MEDICAID PROGRAM .1 | |
356 | 339 | (12) T | |
357 | - | HIS SECTION IS REPEALED, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025. | |
358 | - | PAGE 7-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 SECTION 2. Appropriation. (1) For the 2022-23 state fiscal year, | |
359 | - | $163,338 is appropriated to the department of education. This appropriation | |
360 | - | is from the general fund. To implement this act, the department may use this | |
361 | - | appropriation as follows: | |
362 | - | (a) $128,341 for federal nutrition programs, which amount is based | |
363 | - | on an assumption that the department will require an additional 0.4 FTE; | |
364 | - | and | |
365 | - | (b) $34,997 for administration related to public school finance, | |
366 | - | which amount is based on an assumption that the department will require | |
367 | - | an additional 0.1 FTE. | |
368 | - | SECTION 3. Safety clause. The general assembly hereby finds, | |
369 | - | PAGE 8-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate | |
370 | - | preservation of the public peace, health, or safety. | |
371 | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ | |
372 | - | Alec Garnett Steve Fenberg | |
373 | - | SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF | |
374 | - | OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE | |
375 | - | ____________________________ ____________________________ | |
376 | - | Robin Jones Cindi L. Markwell | |
377 | - | CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF | |
378 | - | OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE | |
379 | - | APPROVED________________________________________ | |
380 | - | (Date and Time) | |
381 | - | _________________________________________ | |
382 | - | Jared S. Polis | |
383 | - | GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO | |
384 | - | PAGE 9-HOUSE BILL 22-1202 | |
340 | + | HIS SECTION IS REPEALED, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025.2 SECTION 2. Appropriation. (1) For the 2022-23 state fiscal3 | |
341 | + | year, $163,338 is appropriated to the department of education. This4 | |
342 | + | appropriation is from the general fund. To implement this act, the5 | |
343 | + | department may use this appropriation as follows:6 | |
344 | + | (a) $128,341 for federal nutrition programs, which amount is7 | |
345 | + | based on an assumption that the department will require an additional 0.48 | |
346 | + | FTE; and9 | |
347 | + | (b) $34,997 for administration related to public school finance,10 | |
348 | + | which amount is based on an assumption that the department will require11 | |
349 | + | an additional 0.1 FTE.12 | |
350 | + | SECTION 3. Safety clause. The general assembly hereby finds,13 | |
351 | + | determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate14 | |
352 | + | preservation of the public peace, health, or safety.15 | |
353 | + | 1202 | |
354 | + | -10- |