Colorado 2022 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB157 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1+Second Regular Session
2+Seventy-third General Assembly
3+STATE OF COLORADO
4+REREVISED
5+This Version Includes All Amendments
6+Adopted in the Second House
7+LLS NO. 22-0038.01 Jennifer Berman x3286
18 SENATE BILL 22-157
2-BY SENATOR(S) Holbert and Fenberg, Coram, Danielson, Jaquez Lewis,
3-Lee, Moreno, Pettersen, Priola, Zenzinger;
4-also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Hooton and Van Winkle, Amabile, Bernett,
5-Carver, Gray, Jodeh, Lindsay, Pico, Ricks, Valdez A., Will.
9+Senate Committees House Committees
10+Business, Labor, & Technology Business Affairs & Labor
11+A BILL FOR AN ACT
612 C
7-ONCERNING THE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS RELATING TO UNFAIR BUSINESS
8-PRACTICES COMMITTED BY REGULATED PERSONS
9-.
10-
11-Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
12-SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 6-1-116 as
13-follows:
14-6-1-116. Investigation of unfair business practices by regulated
15-persons - district attorney requests for records from licensing
16-authorities - interagency agreements with attorney general - legislative
17-declaration - definitions. (1) T
18-HE GENERAL ASSEMBLY HEREBY FINDS ,
19-DETERMINES, AND DECLARES THAT:
13+ONCERNING THE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS RELATING TO UNFAIR101
14+BUSINESS PRACTICES COMMITTED BY REGULATED PERSONS .102
15+Bill Summary
16+(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does
17+not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill
18+passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that
19+applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at
20+http://leg.colorado.gov
21+.)
22+The bill authorizes a district attorney or a deputy or assistant
23+district attorney, in investigating a complaint alleging a violation of
24+consumer protection laws, to request records from a state or local
25+licensing authority (licensing authority) for information regarding a
26+person that the licensing authority regulates (regulated person) and that
27+is the subject of the complaint if the complaint alleges:
28+HOUSE
29+3rd Reading Unamended
30+April 18, 2022
31+HOUSE
32+Amended 2nd Reading
33+April 14, 2022
34+SENATE
35+3rd Reading Unamended
36+March 31, 2022
37+SENATE
38+Amended 2nd Reading
39+March 30, 2022
40+SENATE SPONSORSHIP
41+Holbert and Fenberg, Coram, Danielson, Jaquez Lewis, Lee, Moreno, Pettersen, Priola,
42+Zenzinger
43+HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
44+Hooton and Van Winkle, Amabile, Bernett, Carver, Gray, Jodeh, Lindsay, Pico, Ricks,
45+Valdez A., Will
46+Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
47+Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing statute.
48+Dashes through the words indicate deletions from existing statute. ! The complainant suffered damages in an amount of at least
49+$20,000 and the district attorney determines the amount
50+alleged appears to be reasonable in relation to the alleged
51+conduct forming the basis of the complaint; or
52+! Two or more regulated persons jointly engaged in conduct
53+that forms the basis of the complaint.
54+The licensing authority shall share with, and allow inspection of
55+its records by, the district attorney upon receipt of such request if the
56+licensing authority has already determined not to take action against the
57+regulated person or persons.
58+Additionally, the bill authorizes a state licensing authority, subject
59+to approval by the head of the executive department in which the state
60+licensing authority is located, to enter into an interagency agreement with
61+the attorney general or the attorney general's designee for the referral of
62+complaints alleging violations of consumer protection laws.
63+Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1
64+SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 6-1-116 as2
65+follows:3
66+6-1-116. Investigation of unfair business practices by4
67+regulated persons - district attorney requests for records from5
68+licensing authorities - interagency agreements with attorney general6
69+- legislative declaration - definitions. (1) T
70+HE GENERAL ASSEMBLY7
71+HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES THAT:8
2072 (a) F
21-EDERAL AND STATE CONSUMER PROTECTION AND UNFAIR TRADE
22-LAWS
23-, SUCH AS THOSE PROHIBITING UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE TRADE
24-PRACTICES
25-, PRICE FIXING, AND MONOPOLIZATION , EXIST TO PROTECT
26-NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative
27-officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill
28-or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative
29-history, or the Session Laws.
30-________
31-Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
32-through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
33-the act. CONSUMERS AGAINST UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES THAT UNDERMINE FAIR
34-COMPETITION
35-, A THRIVING SMALL BUSINESS SECTOR , AND CONSUMERS'
36-RIGHTS TO MAKE INFORMED ECONOMIC DECISIONS ;
73+EDERAL AND STATE CONSUMER PROTECTION AND UNFAIR9
74+TRADE LAWS, SUCH AS THOSE PROHIBITING UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE TRADE10
75+PRACTICES, PRICE FIXING, AND MONOPOLIZATION , EXIST TO PROTECT11
76+CONSUMERS AGAINST UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES THAT UNDERMINE FAIR12
77+COMPETITION, A THRIVING SMALL BUSINESS SECTOR , AND CONSUMERS'13
78+RIGHTS TO MAKE INFORMED ECONOMIC DECISIONS ;14
3779 (b) D
38-ISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ARE TASKED
39-WITH
40-, AND HAVE THE EXPERTISE NEEDED FOR , ENFORCING CONSUMER
41-PROTECTION LAWS IN THE STATE
42-;
43-(c) A
44- LICENSING AUTHORITY MIGHT HAVE INFORMATION RELEVANT
45-TO A COMPLAINT ALLEGING THAT A PERSON THAT THE LICENSING AUTHORITY
46-REGULATES HAS COMMITTED UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES
47-; AND
48-(d) THEREFORE, IT BEST SERVES THE CONSUMER PROTECTION
49-INTERESTS OF THE STATE TO ALLOW A LICENSING AUTHORITY TO SHARE WITH
50-A DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL INFORMATION
51-REGARDING A REGULATED PERSON
52-, WHICH INFORMATION MAY BE RELEVANT
53-TO A CONSUMER PROTECTION INVESTIGATION OF THE REGULATED PERSON
54-.
80+ISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ARE15
81+TASKED WITH, AND HAVE THE EXPERTISE NEEDED FOR , ENFORCING16
82+CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS IN THE STATE ;17
83+157-2- (c) A LICENSING AUTHORITY MIGHT HAVE INFORMATION RELE VANT1
84+TO A COMPLAINT ALLEGING THAT A PERSON THAT THE LICENSING2
85+AUTHORITY REGULATES HAS COMMITTED UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE TRADE3
86+PRACTICES; AND4
87+(d) T
88+HEREFORE, IT BEST SERVES THE CONSUMER PROTECTION5
89+INTERESTS OF THE STATE TO ALLOW A LICENSING AUTHORITY TO SHARE6
90+WITH A DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL INFORMATION7
91+REGARDING A REGULATED PERSON , WHICH INFORMATION MAY BE8
92+RELEVANT TO A CONSUMER PROTECTION INVESTIGATION OF THE9
93+REGULATED PERSON.10
5594 (2) (a) U
56-PON RECEIVING A COMPLAINT ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF
57-THE CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE
58-1, A DISTRICT
59-ATTORNEY MAY REQUEST RECORDS FROM A LICENSING AUTHORITY
60-REGARDING A PERSON THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE COMPLAINT IF THE
61-COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT
62-:
95+PON RECEIVING A COMPLAINT ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF11
96+THE CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE 1, A12
97+DISTRICT ATTORNEY MAY REQUEST RECORDS FROM A LICENSING13
98+AUTHORITY REGARDING A PERSON THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE14
99+COMPLAINT IF THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT :15
63100 (I) T
64-HE COMPLAINANT SUFFERED DAMAGES IN AN AMOUNT OF AT
65-LEAST TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
66-DETERMINES THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES ALLEGED APPEARS TO BE A
67-REASONABLE AMOUNT IN RELATION TO THE ALLEGED CONDUCT FORMING
68-THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT
69-; OR
70-(II) TWO OR MORE PERSONS REGULATED BY THE LICENSING
71-AUTHORITY JOINTLY ENGAGED IN CONDUCT THAT FORMS THE BASIS OF THE
72-COMPLAINT
73-.
101+HE COMPLAINANT SUFFERED DAMAGES IN AN AMOUNT OF AT16
102+LEAST TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY17
103+DETERMINES THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES ALLEGED APPEARS TO BE A18
104+REASONABLE AMOUNT IN RELATION TO THE ALLEGED CONDUCT FORMING19
105+THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT; OR20
106+(II) T
107+WO OR MORE PERSONS REGULATED BY THE LICENSING21
108+AUTHORITY JOINTLY ENGAGED IN CONDUCT THAT FORMS THE BASIS OF THE22
109+COMPLAINT.23
74110 (b) N
75-OTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW THAT MAY
76-PROHIBIT A LICENSING AUTHORITY FROM COMPLYING WITH THIS SUBSECTION
77-(2), TO FACILITATE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY 'S INVESTIGATION INTO AND
78-ENFORCEMENT OF THE COMPLAINT
79-, A LICENSING AUTHORITY SHALL PROVIDE
80-THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY WITH COPIES OF
81-, OR ACCESS TO INSPECT, THE
82-RECORDS REQUESTED IF THE LICENSING AUTHORITY HAS ALREADY
83-PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 22-157 DETERMINED IT WILL NOT TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE REGULATED PERSON
84-OR PERSONS
85-.
111+OTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW THAT MAY24
112+PROHIBIT A LICENSING AUTHORITY FROM COMPLYING WITH THIS25
113+SUBSECTION (2), TO FACILITATE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S INVESTIGATION26
114+INTO AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE COMPLAINT , A LICENSING AUTHORITY27
115+157
116+-3- SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY WITH COPIES OF , OR ACCESS TO1
117+INSPECT, THE RECORDS REQUESTED IF THE LICENSING AUTHORITY HAS2
118+ALREADY DETERMINED IT WILL NOT TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE3
119+REGULATED PERSON OR PERSONS .4
86120 (c) T
87-HIS SUBSECTION (2) DOES NOT APPLY TO A PERSON REGULATED
88-BY A BOARD OR COMMISSION
89-.
121+HIS SUBSECTION (2) DOES NOT APPLY TO A PERSON
122+5
123+REGULATED BY A BOARD OR COMMISSION .6
90124 (3) I
91125 N ADDITION TO THE COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES THAT THE
92-REGULATED PERSON OR PERSONS COMPLAINED OF ARE ENTITLED TO
93-RECOVER FROM THE COMPLAINANT PURSUANT TO SECTION
94-6-1-113 (3), IF A
95-COURT DETERMINES THAT THE COMPLAINT IS FRIVOLOUS
96-, GROUNDLESS, AND
97-WAS FILED IN BAD FAITH
98-, OR IF THE REGULATED PERSON OR PERSONS
99-PREVAIL OR SUBSTANTIALLY PREVAIL IN THE MATTER
100-, THE COURT'S ORDER
101-MAY ALSO REQUIRE THE COMPLAINANT TO PAY THE REGULATED PERSON
102-'S OR
103-PERSONS
104-' COSTS INCURRED , ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED , AND
105-REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES INCURRED IN RELATION TO
106-:
126+7
127+REGULATED PERSON OR PERSONS COMPLAINED OF ARE ENTITLED TO8
128+RECOVER FROM THE COMPLAINANT PURSUANT TO SECTION 6-1-113 (3), IF9
129+A COURT DETERMINES THAT THE COMPLAINT IS FRIVOLOUS , GROUNDLESS,10
130+AND WAS FILED IN BAD FAITH, OR IF THE REGULATED PERSON OR PERSONS11
131+PREVAIL OR SUBSTANTIALLY PREVAIL IN THE MATTER , THE COURT'S ORDER12
132+MAY ALSO REQUIRE THE COMPLAINANT TO PAY THE REGULATED PERSON 'S13
133+OR PERSONS' COSTS INCURRED, ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED , AND14
134+REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES INCURRED IN RELATION TO :15
107135 (a) T
108136 HE DISTRICT ATTORNEY 'S OR ATTORNEY GENERAL 'S
109-INVESTIGATION OF THE MATTER
110-; AND
111-(b) THE LICENSING AUTHORITY'S INVESTIGATION OF A COMPLAINT
112-AGAINST THE REGULATED PERSON OR PERSONS IF THE COURT DETERMINES
113-THAT THE TWO COMPLAINTS WERE FILED BY THE SAME COMPLAINANT AND
114-IN REGARD TO THE SAME MATTER
115-.
116-(4) S
117-UBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE HEAD OF AN EXECUTIVE
118-DEPARTMENT
119-, A STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT
120-MAY ENTER INTO AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE ATTORNEY
121-GENERAL OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
122-'S DESIGNEE FOR THE REFERRAL OF
123-ANY COMPLAINT THAT APPEARS TO ALLEGE A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE
137+16
138+INVESTIGATION OF THE MATTER; AND17
139+(b) T
140+HE LICENSING AUTHORITY'S INVESTIGATION OF A COMPLAINT
141+18
142+AGAINST THE REGULATED PERSON OR PERSONS IF THE COURT DETERMINES19
143+THAT THE TWO COMPLAINTS WERE FILED BY THE SAME COMPLAINANT AND20
144+IN REGARD TO THE SAME MATTER .21
145+(4) SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE HEAD OF AN EXECUTIVE22
146+DEPARTMENT, A STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT23
147+MAY ENTER INTO AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE ATTORNEY24
148+GENERAL OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 'S DESIGNEE FOR THE REFERRAL OF25
149+ANY COMPLAINT THAT APPEARS TO ALLEGE A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE26
124150 1
125-OR ARTICLE 2 OR 4 OF THIS TITLE 6. THE INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT MAY
126-PROVIDE FOR REFERRALS OF COMPLAINTS
127-, INFORMATION SHARING ,
128-CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIREMENTS , AND OTHER TERMS THAT FACILITATE THE
129-INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF COMPLAINTS ALLEGING VIOLATIONS
130-OF CONSUMER PROTECTION OR UNFAIR TRADE LAWS
131-.
132-(5) A
133-NY COPIES OF RECORDS THAT A LICENSING AUTHORITY SENDS
134-TO A DISTRICT ATTORNEY
135-, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , OR THE ATTORNEY
136-GENERAL
137-'S DESIGNEE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION ARE RECORDS OF THE
138-INVESTIGATION OF A PROSECUTING ATTORNEY PURSUANT TO SECTION
139-24-72-204 (2)(a)(I) AND ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT OF INSPECTION
140-PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 22-157 UNDER THE "COLORADO OPEN RECORDS ACT", PART 2 OF ARTICLE 72 OF
141-TITLE
142-24.
143-(6) A
144-S USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE
145-REQUIRES
146-:
151+ OR ARTICLE 2 OR 4 OF THIS TITLE 6. THE INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT MAY27
152+157
153+-4- PROVIDE FOR REFERRALS OF COMPLAINTS , INFORMATION SHARING ,1
154+CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIREMENTS , AND OTHER TERMS THAT FACILITATE2
155+THE INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF COMPLAINTS ALLEGING3
156+VIOLATIONS OF CONSUMER PROTECTION OR UNFAIR TRADE LAWS .4
157+(5) ANY COPIES OF RECORDS THAT A LICENSING AUTHORITY SENDS5
158+TO A DISTRICT ATTORNEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR THE ATTORNEY6
159+GENERAL'S DESIGNEE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION ARE RECORDS OF THE7
160+INVESTIGATION OF A PROSECUTING ATTORNEY PURSUANT TO SECTION8
161+24-72-204 (2)(a)(I)
162+AND ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT OF INSPECTION9
163+UNDER THE "COLORADO OPEN RECORDS ACT", PART 2 OF ARTICLE 72 OF10
164+TITLE 24.11
165+(6)
166+ AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE12
167+REQUIRES:13
147168 (a) "D
148-ISTRICT ATTORNEY" INCLUDES THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND
149-THE CHIEF DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
150-, SPECIAL DEPUTY DISTRICT
151-ATTORNEYS
152-, DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS , AND ASSISTANT DISTRICT
153-ATTORNEYS THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY APPOINTS PURSUANT TO PART
169+ISTRICT ATTORNEY" INCLUDES THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND14
170+THE CHIEF DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS , SPECIAL DEPUTY DISTRICT15
171+ATTORNEYS, DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS , AND ASSISTANT DISTRICT16
172+ATTORNEYS THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY APPOINTS PURSUANT TO PART17
154173 2
155-OF ARTICLE 1 OF TITLE 20.
174+ OF ARTICLE 1 OF TITLE 20.18
156175 (b) "L
157-ICENSING AUTHORITY" MEANS A STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY
158-OR A LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY
159-.
176+ICENSING AUTHORITY" MEANS A STATE LICENSING19
177+AUTHORITY OR A LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY .20
160178 (c) "L
161-OCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY" MEANS THE GOVERNING BODY
162-OF A STATUTORY OR HOME RULE MUNICIPALITY
163-, COUNTY, OR CITY AND
164-COUNTY THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE OR APPROVE A LOCAL LICENSE TO A
165-REGULATED PERSON OR FOR AN ACTIVITY
166-.
179+OCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY" MEANS THE GOVERNING BODY21
180+OF A STATUTORY OR HOME RULE MUNICIPALITY , COUNTY, OR CITY AND22
181+COUNTY THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE OR APPROVE A LOCAL LICENSE TO23
182+A REGULATED PERSON OR FOR AN ACTIVITY .24
167183 (d) (I) "S
168-TATE LICENSING AUTHORITY" MEANS A DEPARTMENT OR
169-DIVISION OF THE STATE THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE TO OR APPROVE A
170-STATE LICENSE FOR A REGULATED PERSON
171-, WHICH STATE LICENSE ONLY
172-AUTHORIZES THE LICENSEE TO PERFORM ACTIVITIES AT SPECIFIC PREMISES
173-.
184+TATE LICENSING AUTHORITY" MEANS A DEPARTMENT OR25
185+DIVISION OF THE STATE THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE TO OR APPROVE A26
186+STATE LICENSE FOR A REGULATED PERSON, WHICH STATE LICENSE ONLY27
187+157
188+-5- AUTHORIZES THE LICENSEE TO PERFORM ACTIVITIES AT SPECIFIC PREMISES .1
174189 (II) "S
175-TATE LICENSING AUTHORITY" DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY BOARD
176-OR COMMISSION
177-.
178-SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-31-101, amend
179-(1)(p) and (1)(q); and add (1)(r) as follows:
180-24-31-101. Powers and duties of attorney general. (1) The
181-attorney general:
182-(p) May bring a civil action to enforce the provisions of section
190+TATE LICENSING AUTHORITY " DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY2
191+BOARD OR COMMISSION.3
192+SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-31-101, amend4
193+(1)(p) and (1)(q); and add (1)(r) as follows:5
194+24-31-101. Powers and duties of attorney general. (1) The6
195+attorney general:7
196+(p) May bring a civil action to enforce the provisions of section8
183197 24-31-113; and
184-(q) May bring a civil action to enforce the provisions of section
185-24-31-307 (2) or a criminal action to enforce the provisions of section
198+9
199+(q) May bring a civil action to enforce the provisions of section10
200+24-31-307 (2) or a criminal action to enforce the provisions of section11
186201 24-31-307 (3);
187-AND
188-PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 22-157 (r) MAY ENTER INTO INTERAGENCY AGREEMENTS PURSUANT TO
189-SECTION
190-6-1-116 (4).
191-SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act
192-takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the
193-ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except
194-that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V
195-of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act
196-within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect
197-unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in
198-PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 22-157 November 2022 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official
199-declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
200-____________________________ ____________________________
201-Steve Fenberg Alec Garnett
202-PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
203-THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES
204-____________________________ ____________________________
205-Cindi L. Markwell Robin Jones
206-SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE
207-THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES
208- APPROVED________________________________________
209- (Date and Time)
210- _________________________________________
211- Jared S. Polis
212- GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
213-PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 22-157
202+AND12
203+(r) M
204+AY ENTER INTO INTERAGENCY AGREEMENTS PURSUANT TO13
205+SECTION 6-1-116 (4).
206+14
207+SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act15
208+takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the16
209+ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except17
210+that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V18
211+of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this19
212+act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take20
213+effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in21
214+November 2022 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the22
215+official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.23
216+157
217+-6-