Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1195

Introduced
2/13/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Engrossed
3/6/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Enrolled
4/13/23  
Engrossed
4/25/23  
Engrossed
4/26/23  
Enrolled
4/26/23  

Caption

Automated Pharmacy Dispensing System

Impact

The implementation of HB 1195 will impact several existing statutes, particularly those related to pharmacy operations and public health safety. By mandating that automated systems be registered with the appropriate state board, and ensuring they are overseen by licensed pharmacists, the bill aims to uphold standards of care and accountability. Additionally, it requires pharmacies to develop and implement written policies that detail security measures, training for personnel, and procedures for maintaining the quality of prescribed medications. These changes underscore a commitment to ensuring that technological advancements in pharmacy do not compromise patient safety.

Summary

House Bill 1195 aims to regulate the operation of automated pharmacy dispensing systems within the state of Colorado. The bill outlines a framework in which prescription drugs can be dispensed through mechanical systems while ensuring that public safety and operational integrity are maintained. The law stipulates that pharmacies operating such systems are responsible for their security, maintenance, and operation, and must have pharmacists available to supervise the activities associated with these systems, even if remotely. This is a significant regulatory shift that can influence pharmacy operations statewide.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1195 appears to be largely supportive within the legislative discussions. Proponents argue that the bill represents progressive regulation that aligns with modern advancements in healthcare because automation can enhance efficiency and potentially improve patient access to medications. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding implementation costs and how rural areas might access these automated systems, suggesting that not all stakeholders are wholly convinced of the bill's viability or benefits.

Contention

Some points of contention arise around the extent of oversight required by the bill and the potential challenges of implementing these systems in a cost-effective manner. While the inclusion of a remote pharmacist's supervision helps maintain high standards, it raises questions about the practicality of accessing such services in geographically isolated areas. Enhanced regulatory measures, including stringent guidelines for operational security and medication accountability, could also increase compliance burdens for smaller community pharmacies, impacting their ability to adapt to these new requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB2863

Health care coverage: prescriptions.

CA AB577

Health care coverage: antisteering.

CA AB1048

Health care: pain management and Schedule II drug prescriptions.

CA AB458

Importation of prescription drugs.

HI HB218

Relating To Prescription Drugs.

HI SB608

Relating To Prescription Drugs.