Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1225 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1+First Regular Session
2+Seventy-fourth General Assembly
3+STATE OF COLORADO
4+REREVISED
5+This Version Includes All Amendments
6+Adopted in the Second House
7+LLS NO. 23-0867.01 Richard Sweetman x4333
18 HOUSE BILL 23-1225
2-BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) deGruy Kennedy and Dickson, Amabile,
3-Bacon, Bird, Brown, Duran, English, Epps, Froelich, Garcia,
4-Gonzales-Gutierrez, Hamrick, Herod, Jodeh, Joseph, Kipp, Lieder, Lindsay,
5-Lindstedt, Lukens, Mabrey, Mauro, McCormick, McLachlan,
6-Michaelson Jenet, Ortiz, Ricks, Sharbini, Sirota, Snyder, Story, Titone,
7-Velasco, Vigil, Weissman, Woodrow, Young, McCluskie;
8-also SENATOR(S) Jaquez Lewis and Buckner, Coleman, Cutter, Priola.
9+House Committees Senate Committees
10+Health & Insurance Health & Human Services
11+A BILL FOR AN ACT
912 C
10-ONCERNING THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG AFFORDABILITY BOARD , AND, IN
11-CONNECTION THEREWITH
12-, MODIFYING THE AFFORDABILITY REVIEW
13-PROCESS
14-, ALLOWING THE BOARD TO ESTABLISH UPPER PAYMENT
15-LIMITS FOR AN ADDITIONAL NUMBER OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS
16-,
17-CLARIFYING WHICH BOARD FUNCTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL
18-REVIEW
19-, AUTHORIZING AN INDIVIDUAL TO REQUEST AN INDEPENDENT
20-EXTERNAL REVIEW OF A DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR BENEFITS FOR A
21-PRESCRIPTION DRUG THAT HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM SALE OR
22-DISTRIBUTION IN THE STATE
23-, AND EXTENDING THE REPEAL DATE OF
24-THE BOARD
25-.
26-
27-Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
28-SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1401, add (7.5)
29-NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative
30-officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill
31-or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative
32-history, or the Session Laws.
33-________
34-Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law; dashes
35-through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of
36-the act. as follows:
37-10-16-1401. Definitions. As used in this part 14, unless the context
38-otherwise requires:
13+ONCERNING THE PRESCRIPTIO N DRUG AFFORDABILITY BOARD , AND,101
14+IN CONNECTION THEREWITH , MODIFYING THE AFFORDABILITY102
15+REVIEW PROCESS, ALLOWING THE BOARD TO ESTABLISH UPPER103
16+PAYMENT LIMITS FOR AN ADDITIONAL
17+ NUMBER OF104
18+PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, CLARIFYING WHICH BOARD FUNCTIONS105
19+ARE SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW , AUTHORIZING AN106
20+INDIVIDUAL TO REQUEST AN I NDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW107
21+OF A DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR BENEFITS FOR A PRESCRIPTION108
22+DRUG THAT HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM SALE OR109
23+DISTRIBUTION IN THE STATE, AND EXTENDING THE REPEAL DATE110
24+OF THE BOARD.111
25+Bill Summary
26+SENATE
27+3rd Reading Unamended
28+April 24, 2023
29+SENATE
30+Amended 2nd Reading
31+April 21, 2023
32+HOUSE
33+3rd Reading Unamended
34+March 21, 2023
35+HOUSE
36+Amended 2nd Reading
37+March 20, 2023
38+HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
39+deGruy Kennedy and Dickson, Amabile, Bacon, Bird, Brown, Duran, English, Epps,
40+Froelich, Garcia, Gonzales-Gutierrez, Hamrick, Herod, Jodeh, Joseph, Kipp, Lieder, Lindsay,
41+Lindstedt, Lukens, Mabrey, Mauro, McCluskie, McCormick, McLachlan, Michaelson Jenet,
42+Ortiz, Ricks, Sharbini, Sirota, Snyder, Story, Titone, Velasco, Vigil, Weissman, Woodrow,
43+Young
44+SENATE SPONSORSHIP
45+Jaquez Lewis and Buckner, Coleman, Cutter, Priola
46+Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
47+Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.
48+Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does
49+not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill
50+passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that
51+applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at
52+http://leg.colorado.gov
53+.)
54+In 2021, the general assembly enacted SB 21-175, which created
55+the prescription drug affordability board (board) in the division of
56+insurance (division) and an affordability review process whereby the
57+board may review costs associated with, and establish upper payment
58+limits for, certain prescription drugs. The bill makes certain changes
59+concerning the board.
60+Section 1 defines "board activity", and section 2 states that only
61+board members, and not staff members or contractors of the division, are
62+required to recuse themselves from any board activity or vote where they
63+have a conflict of interest.
64+Section 3 allows the chair of the board to cancel or postpone a
65+board meeting for good cause.
66+Section 4 makes certain changes to the procedure by which the
67+board identifies prescription drugs that may be subjected to an
68+affordability review. Section 4 also requires the board to report on its
69+public web page certain information regarding its considerations.
70+Section 5 removes language prohibiting the board from
71+establishing an upper payment limit for more than 12 prescription drugs
72+within a specified period.
73+Section 6 establishes that an upper payment limit for a prescription
74+drug is not a final agency action that is subject to judicial review until the
75+board promulgates a rule establishing the upper payment limit.
76+Sections 6 and 7 remove certain language describing an appeals
77+process for appealing decisions of the board.
78+Sections 8 and 9 extend the repeal and associated sunset review
79+of the board from September 1, 2026, to September 1, 2031.
80+Section 10 establishes that a denial of a request for benefits for a
81+prescription drug that is unavailable in the state because a manufacturer
82+has withdrawn the prescription drug from sale or distribution within the
83+state is an "adverse determination" for which an individual may request
84+an independent external review.
85+Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1
86+SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1401, add2
87+(7.5) as follows:3
88+10-16-1401. Definitions. As used in this part 14, unless the4
89+1225-2- context otherwise requires:1
3990 (7.5) "B
40-OARD ACTIVITY" MEANS:
91+OARD ACTIVITY" MEANS:2
4192 (a) S
42-ELECTING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR AN AFFORDABILITY REVIEW
43-PURSUANT TO SECTION
44-10-16-1406 (2);
93+ELECTING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR AN AFFORDABILITY3
94+REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-16-1406 (2);4
4595 (b) D
46-ETERMINING WHETHER A PRESCRIPTION DRUG IS
47-UNAFFORDABLE PURSUANT TO SECTION
48-10-16-1406 (3);
96+ETERMINING WHETHER A PRESCRIPTION DRUG IS5
97+UNAFFORDABLE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-16-1406 (3);6
4998 (c) S
50-ELECTING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR WHICH THE BOARD
51-ESTABLISHES AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION
99+ELECTING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR WHICH THE BOARD7
100+ESTABLISHES AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION8
52101 10-16-1407;
53-AND
54-(d) ESTABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT FOR A PRESCRIPTION
55-DRUG PURSUANT TO SECTION
56-10-16-1407.
57-SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1402, amend
58-(3)(c) as follows:
59-10-16-1402. Colorado prescription drug affordability review
60-board - created - membership - terms - conflicts of interest.
61-(3) (c) (I) Board members staff members, and contractors of the division,
62-on behalf of the board, shall recuse themselves from any board activity OR
63-VOTE
64- in any case in which they have a conflict of interest.
102+ AND9
103+(d) E
104+STABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT FOR A PRESCRIPTION10
105+DRUG PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-16-1407.11
106+SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1402, amend12
107+(3)(c) as follows:13
108+10-16-1402. Colorado prescription drug affordability review14
109+board - created - membership - terms - conflicts of interest.15
110+(3) (c) (I)
111+ Board members staff members, and contractors of the division,16
112+on behalf of the board, shall recuse themselves from any board activity OR17
113+VOTE in any case in which they have a conflict of interest.18
65114 (II) S
66115 TAFF MEMBERS AND CONTRACTORS OF THE DIVISION , ON
67-BEHALF OF THE BOARD
68-, SHALL DISCLOSE ANY CONFLICT OF INTEREST
69-RELATED TO A PRESCRIPTION DRUG FOR WHICH THE BOARD IS CONDUCTING
70-AN AFFORDABILITY REVIEW OR ESTABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT
71-.
116+19
117+BEHALF OF THE BOARD, SHALL DISCLOSE ANY CONFLICT OF INTEREST20
118+RELATED TO A PRESCRIPTION DRUG FOR WHICH THE BOARD IS CONDUCTING21
119+AN AFFORDABILITY REVIEW OR ESTABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT .22
72120 (III) N
73121 OTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION (3)(d) OF THIS SECTION AND
74-THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SECTION
75-10-16-1414 (1)(f), A
76-CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSED BY A STAFF MEMBER OR BY A
77-CONTRACTOR OF THE DIVISION
78-, WHICH DISCLOSURE PERTAINS TO A
79-PERSONAL ASSOCIATION
80-, MUST REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL. THE BOARD, UPON
81-REVIEW OF SUCH A DISCLOSURE
82-, MAY DIRECT THE STAFF MEMBER OR
83-PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 23-1225 CONTRACTOR TO RECUSE THEMSELVES BASED ON THE CONFLICT OF
84-INTEREST
85-.
86-SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1404, amend (1)
87-as follows:
88-10-16-1404. Colorado prescription drug affordability review
89-board meetings - required to be public - exceptions. (1) The board shall
90-hold its first meeting within six weeks after all of the board members are
91-appointed and shall meet at least every six weeks thereafter to review
92-prescription drugs; except that the chair may cancel or postpone a meeting
93-if the board has no prescription drugs to review
94-OR FOR GOOD CAUSE.
95-SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1406, amend (1)
96-introductory portion, (1)(a), (1)(b), and (2) introductory portion; repeal
97-(1)(c); and add (8) as follows:
98-10-16-1406. Colorado prescription drug affordability review
99-board - affordability reviews of prescription drugs. (1) The board may
100-conduct affordability reviews of prescription drugs in accordance with this
101-section. The board shall identify, for purposes of determining whether to
102-conduct an affordability review: any prescription drug that is:
103-(a) A brand-name drug or biological product that, as adjusted
104-annually for inflation, has ANY PRESCRIPTION DRUG THAT HAS:
105-(I) An initial A wholesale acquisition cost of thirty THREE thousand
106-dollars or more; for a twelve-month supply or for a course of treatment that
107-is less than twelve months in duration; or
108-(I.5) AN INCREASE OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS OR MORE ABOVE
109-THE WHOLESALE ACQUISITION COST FOR THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG IN THE
110-PRECEDING TWELVE MONTHS
111-;
112-(II) An increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of ten percent or
113-more during AN INCREASE OF TWO HUNDRED PERCENT OR MORE ABOVE THE
114-WHOLESALE ACQUISITION COST FOR THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG IN
115- the
116-immediately
117- preceding twelve months; for a twelve-month supply or for a
118-course of treatment that is less than twelve months in duration; OR
119-PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 23-1225 (III) A CURRENT WHOLESALE ACQUISITION COST FOR AN AVERAGE
120-COURSE OF TREATMENT PER PERSON PER YEAR OF THIRTY THOUSAND
121-DOLLARS OR MORE
122-; AND
123-(b) A ANY biosimilar drug that has an initial wholesale acquisition
122+23
123+THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SECTION 10-16-1414 (1)(f),24
124+A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSED BY A STAFF MEMBER OR BY A25
125+CONTRACTOR OF THE DIVISION , WHICH DISCLOSURE PERTAINS TO A26
126+PERSONAL ASSOCIATION, MUST REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL. THE BOARD, UPON27
127+1225
128+-3- REVIEW OF SUCH A DISCLOSURE , MAY DIRECT THE STAFF MEMBER OR1
129+CONTRACTOR TO RECUSE THEMSELF BASED ON THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST .2
130+SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1404, amend3
131+(1) as follows:4
132+10-16-1404. Colorado prescription drug affordability review5
133+board meetings - required to be public - exceptions. (1) The board6
134+shall hold its first meeting within six weeks after all of the board7
135+members are appointed and shall meet at least every six weeks thereafter8
136+to review prescription drugs; except that the chair may cancel or postpone9
137+a meeting if the board has no prescription drugs to review
138+OR FOR GOOD10
139+CAUSE.11
140+SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1406, amend12
141+(1)(a), (1)(b), and (2) introductory portion; repeal (1)(c); and add (8) as13
142+follows:14
143+10-16-1406. Colorado prescription drug affordability review15
144+board - affordability reviews of prescription drugs. (1) The board may16
145+conduct affordability reviews of prescription drugs in accordance with17
146+this section. The board shall identify, for purposes of determining whether18
147+to conduct an affordability review: any prescription drug that is:19
148+(a) A brand-name drug or biological product that, as adjusted20
149+annually for inflation, has ANY PRESCRIPTION DRUG THAT HAS:21
150+(I) An initial A wholesale acquisition cost of thirty THREE22
151+thousand dollars or more; for a twelve-month supply or for a course of23
152+treatment that is less than twelve months in duration; or24
153+(I.5) A
154+N INCREASE OF THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS OR MORE ABOVE25
155+THE WHOLESALE ACQUISITION COST FOR THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG IN THE26
156+PRECEDING TWELVE MONTHS ;27
157+1225
158+-4- (II) An increase in the wholesale acquisition cost of ten percent1
159+or more during AN INCREASE OF TWO HUNDRED PERCENT OR MORE ABOVE2
160+THE WHOLESALE ACQUISITION COST FOR THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG IN the3
161+immediately preceding twelve months; for a twelve-month supply or for4
162+a course of treatment that is less than twelve months in duration; OR5
163+(III) A
164+ CURRENT WHOLESALE ACQUISITION COST FOR AN AVERAGE6
165+COURSE OF TREATMENT PER PERSON PER YEAR OF THIRTY THOUSAND7
166+DOLLARS OR
167+MORE; AND8
168+(b) A ANY biosimilar drug that has an initial wholesale acquisition9
124169 cost that is not at least fifteen percent lower than
125-THE WHOLESALE
126-ACQUISITION COST OF
127- the corresponding biological product. or (c) A generic drug:
128-(I) That, as adjusted annually for inflation, has a wholesale
129-acquisition cost of one hundred dollars or more for:
130-(A) A thirty-day supply based on the recommended dosage approved
131-for labeling by the FDA;
132-(B) A supply that lasts less than thirty days based on the
133-recommended dosage approved for labeling by the FDA; or
134-(C) One dose of the generic drug if the labeling approved by the
135-FDA does not recommend a finite dosage; and
136-(II) For which the wholesale acquisition cost increased by two
137-hundred percent or more during the immediately preceding twelve months,
138-as determined by comparing the current wholesale acquisition cost to the
139-average wholesale acquisition cost reported during the immediately
140-preceding twelve months.
141-(2) After identifying prescription drugs as described in subsection
142-(1) of this section, the board shall determine whether to conduct an
143-affordability review for each
144- AN identified prescription drug by:
170+THE WHOLESALE10
171+ACQUISITION COST OF the corresponding biological
172+product. or11
173+(c) A generic drug: 12
174+(I) That, as adjusted annually for inflation, has a wholesale13
175+acquisition cost of one hundred dollars or more for:14
176+(A) A thirty-day supply based on the recommended dosage15
177+approved for labeling by the FDA;16
178+(B) A supply that lasts less than thirty days based on the17
179+recommended dosage approved for labeling by the FDA; or18
180+(C) One dose of the generic drug if the labeling approved by the19
181+FDA does not recommend a finite dosage; and20
182+(II) For which the wholesale acquisition cost increased by two21
183+hundred percent or more during the immediately preceding twelve22
184+months, as determined by comparing the current wholesale acquisition23
185+cost to the average wholesale acquisition cost reported during the24
186+immediately preceding twelve months.25
187+(2) After identifying prescription drugs as described in subsection26
188+(1) of this section, the board shall determine whether to conduct an27
189+1225
190+-5- affordability review for each AN identified prescription drug by:1
145191 (8) T
146-HE BOARD SHALL ISSUE A REPORT SUMMARIZING , TO THE
147-EXTENT PERMITTED BY SECTION
148-10-16-1404 (3), THE DATA THAT THE BOARD
149-CONSIDERED IN MAKING THE BOARD
150-'S DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER A
151-PRESCRIPTION DRUG IS UNAFFORDABLE
152-. THE BOARD SHALL MAKE THE
153-REPORT AVAILABLE ON ITS PUBLIC WEB PAGE
154-.
155-SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1407, amend (1)
156-and (5) as follows:
157-PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 23-1225 10-16-1407. Colorado prescription drug affordability review
158-board - upper payment limits for certain prescription drugs - rules -
159-severability. (1) (a) The board may establish an upper payment limit for
160-any prescription drug for which the board has performed an affordability
161-review pursuant to section 10-16-1406 and determined that the use of the
162-prescription drug is unaffordable for Colorado consumers; except that:
163-(I) The board may not establish an upper payment limit for more
164-than twelve prescription drugs in each calendar year for three years
192+HE BOARD SHALL ISSUE A REPORT SUMMARIZING , TO THE2
193+EXTENT PERMITTED BY SECTION 10-16-1404 (3), THE DATA THAT THE3
194+BOARD CONSIDERED IN MAKING THE BOARD 'S DETERMINATION AS TO4
195+WHETHER A PRESCRIPTION DRUG IS UNAFFORDABLE . THE BOARD SHALL5
196+MAKE THE REPORT AVAILABLE ON ITS PUBLIC WEB PAGE .6
197+SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1407, amend7
198+(1) and (5) as follows:8
199+10-16-1407. Colorado prescription drug affordability review9
200+board - upper payment limits for certain prescription drugs - rules10
201+
202+ - severability. (1) (a) The board may establish an upper payment11
203+limit for any prescription drug for which the board has performed an12
204+affordability review pursuant to section 10-16-1406 and determined that13
205+the use of the prescription drug is unaffordable for Colorado consumers;14
206+except that:15
207+(I) The board may not establish an upper payment limit for more16
208+than twelve prescription drugs in each calendar year for three years17
165209 beginning April 1, 2022,
166-UNLESS THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A
167-NEED TO ESTABLISH UPPER PAYMENT LIMITS FOR MORE THAN TWELVE
168-PRESCRIPTION DRUGS
169-, IN WHICH CASE THE BOARD MAY ESTABLISH AN UPPER
170-PAYMENT LIMIT FOR UP TO EIGHTEEN PRESCRIPTION DRUGS SO LONG AS THE
171-BOARD HAS SUFFICIENT STAFF SUPPORT TO DO SO
172-; AND
173-(II) FOR EACH PRESCRIPTION DRUG FOR WHICH THE BOARD
174-ESTABLISHES AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT
175-, THE BOARD MAY INCLUDE MULTIPLE
176-NATIONAL DRUG CODES
177-, AS DESCRIBED IN 21 CFR 207.33, THAT ARE
178-INDICATED FOR THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG
179-.
180-(b) The failure of an entity to provide information to the board
181-pursuant to section 10-16-1406 (7)(b) does not affect the authority of the
182-board to establish an upper payment limit for the
183- A prescription drug.
184-(5) An upper payment limit applies to all purchases of and payer
185-reimbursements for a prescription drug that is dispensed or administered to
186-individuals in the state in person, by mail, or by other means and for which
187-an upper payment limit is established. The board shall promulgate rules that
188-establish
189-UPPER PAYMENT LIMITS AND the effective date of any upper
190-payment limit established by the board, which effective date is at least six
191-months after the adoption of the upper payment limit by the board and
192-applies only to purchases, contracts, and plans that are issued on or renewed
193-after the effective date.
194-SECTION 6. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1408, amend (1)
195-and (2); and repeal (3) as follows:
196-10-16-1408. Colorado prescription drug affordability review
197-board - judicial review. (1) A person aggrieved by a decision of the board
198-may appeal the decision within sixty days after the decision is made. The
199-PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 23-1225 board shall consider the appeal and issue a final decision concerning the
200-appeal within sixty days after the board receives the appeal. THE
201-FOLLOWING BOARD FUNCTIONS ARE NOT FINAL AGENCY ACTIONS SUBJECT TO
202-JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE
203-"STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT",
204-ARTICLE 4 OF TITLE 24:
210+UNLESS THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT THERE IS
211+18
212+A NEED TO ESTABLISH UPPER PAYMENT LIMITS FOR MORE THAN TWELVE19
213+PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, IN WHICH CASE THE BOARD MAY ESTABLISH AN20
214+UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT FOR UP TO EIGHTEEN PRESCRIPTION DRUGS SO LONG21
215+AS THE BOARD HAS SUFFICIENT STAFF SUPPORT TO DO SO ; AND22
216+(II) F
217+OR EACH PRESCRIPTION DRUG FOR WHICH THE BOARD
218+23
219+ESTABLISHES AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT , THE BOARD MAY INCLUDE24
220+MULTIPLE NATIONAL DRUG CODES , AS DESCRIBED IN 21 CFR 207.33, THAT25
221+ARE INDICATED FOR THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG .26
222+(b) The failure of an entity to provide information to the board27
223+1225
224+-6- pursuant to section 10-16-1406 (7)(b) does not affect the authority of the1
225+board to establish an upper payment limit for the A prescription drug.2
226+(5) An upper payment limit applies to all purchases of and payer3
227+reimbursements for a prescription drug that is dispensed or administered4
228+to individuals in the state in person, by mail, or by other means and for5
229+which an upper payment limit is established. The board shall promulgate6
230+rules that establish
231+UPPER PAYMENT LIMITS AND the effective date of any7
232+upper payment limit established by the board, which effective date is at8
233+least six months after the adoption of the upper payment limit by the9
234+board and applies only to purchases, contracts, and plans that are issued10
235+on or renewed after the effective date.11
236+SECTION 6. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1408, amend12
237+(1) and (2); and repeal (3) as follows:13
238+10-16-1408. Colorado prescription drug affordability review14
239+board - judicial review. (1) A person aggrieved by a decision of the
240+15
241+board may appeal the decision within sixty days after the decision is16
242+made. The board shall consider the appeal and issue a final decision17
243+concerning the appeal within sixty days after the board receives the18
244+appeal. THE FOLLOWING BOARD FUNCTIONS ARE NOT FINAL AGENCY19
245+ACTIONS SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE "STATE20
246+A
247+DMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT", ARTICLE 4 OF TITLE 24:21
205248 (a) I
206-DENTIFICATION OF ELIGIBLE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS PURSUANT TO
207-SECTION
208-10-16-1406 (1);
249+DENTIFICATION OF ELIGIBLE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS PURSUANT22
250+TO SECTION 10-16-1406 (1);23
209251 (b) S
210-ELECTION OF A PRESCRIPTION DRUG PURSUANT TO SECTION
211-10-16-1406 (2); AND
212-(c) DETERMINATION THAT A PRESCRIPTION DRUG IS UNAFFORDABLE
213-PURSUANT TO SECTION
214-10-16-1406 (3).
215-(2) Not later than March 31, 2022, the board shall promulgate rules
216-establishing a process and timeline for the consideration by the board of any
217-appeal that is submitted to the board pursuant to subsection (1) of this
218-section. The process and timeline must comport with the "State
219-Administrative Procedure Act", article 4 of title 24 A RULE OF THE BOARD
220-ESTABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT IS A FINAL AGENCY ACTION
221-SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE
222-"STATE ADMINISTRATIVE
223-PROCEDURE ACT", ARTICLE 4 OF TITLE 24. A PARTY SEEKING JUDICIAL
224-REVIEW OF A RULE ESTABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT MAY SEEK
225-REVIEW OF WHETHER THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG SATISFIES THE NECESSARY
226-CRITERIA IN SECTION
227-10-16-1406 TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR AN UPPER PAYMENT
228-LIMIT
229-.
252+ELECTION OF A PRESCRIPTION DRUG PURSUANT TO SECTION24
253+10-16-1406
254+ (2); AND25
255+(c) D
256+ETERMINATION THAT A PRESCRIPTION DRUG IS26
257+UNAFFORDABLE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-16-1406 (3).27
258+1225
259+-7- (2) Not later than March 31, 2022, the board shall promulgate1
260+rules establishing a process and timeline for the consideration by the2
261+board of any appeal that is submitted to the board pursuant to subsection3
262+(1) of this section. The process and timeline must comport with the "State4
263+Administrative Procedure Act", article 4 of title 24 A RULE OF THE BOARD5
264+ESTABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT IS A FINAL AGENCY ACTION6
265+SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE "STATE ADMINISTRATIVE7
266+P
267+ROCEDURE ACT", ARTICLE 4 OF TITLE 24. A PARTY SEEKING JUDICIAL8
268+REVIEW OF A RULE ESTABLISHING AN UPPER PAYMENT LIMIT MAY SEEK9
269+REVIEW OF WHETHER THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG SATISFIES THE NECESSARY10
270+CRITERIA IN SECTION 10-16-1406 TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR AN UPPER PAYMENT11
271+LIMIT.12
230272 (3) In the absence of an appeal, a decision of the board becomes
231-final and ripe for judicial review after sixty days. Any person aggrieved by
232-a final decision of the board may petition for judicial review pursuant to
233-section 24-4-106.
234-SECTION 7. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1414, amend (1)
235-introductory portion, (1)(b), and (1)(e) as follows:
236-10-16-1414. Reports. (1) Notwithstanding section 24-1-136
237-(11)(a), on or before July 1, 2023, and on or before July 1 each year
238-thereafter, the board shall submit a report to the governor, the health and
239-insurance committee of the house of representatives, and the health and
240-PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 23-1225 human services committee of the senate, or to any successor committees,
241-summarizing the activities WORK of the board during the preceding calendar
242-year. At a minimum, the report must include:
243-(b) The number of prescription drugs that were subjected to an
244-affordability review by the board pursuant to section 10-16-1406, including
245-the results of each affordability review; and the number and disposition of
246-any appeals or judicial reviews of the board's decisions;
247-(e) A summary of any appeals JUDICIAL REVIEWS of board decisions,
248-that were considered by the board pursuant to section 10-16-1408, including
249-an indication of the outcome of any such appeal JUDICIAL REVIEW;
250-SECTION 8. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 10-16-1416 as
251-follows:
252-10-16-1416. Repeal of part. This part 14 is repealed, effective
253-September 1, 2026 SEPTEMBER 1, 2031. Before the repeal, the functions of
254-the board are scheduled for review in accordance with section 24-34-104.
255-SECTION 9. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-104, repeal
256-(27)(a)(XIX); and add (32)(a)(X) as follows:
257-24-34-104. General assembly review of regulatory agencies and
258-functions for repeal, continuation, or reestablishment - legislative
259-declaration - repeal. (27) (a) The following agencies, functions, or both,
260-are scheduled for repeal on September 1, 2026:
261-(XIX) The Colorado prescription drug affordability review board
262-created in section 10-16-1402.
263-(32) (a) The following agencies, functions, or both, are scheduled
264-for repeal on September 1, 2031:
273+13
274+final and ripe for judicial review after sixty days. Any person aggrieved14
275+by a final decision of the board may petition for judicial review pursuant15
276+to section 24-4-106.16
277+SECTION 7. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-1414, amend17
278+(1) introductory portion, (1)(b), and (1)(e) as follows:18
279+10-16-1414. Reports. (1) Notwithstanding section 24-1-13619
280+(11)(a), on or before July 1, 2023, and on or before July 1 each year20
281+thereafter, the board shall submit a report to the governor, the health and21
282+insurance committee of the house of representatives, and the health and22
283+human services committee of the senate, or to any successor committees,23
284+summarizing the activities WORK of the board during the preceding24
285+calendar year. At a minimum, the report must include:25
286+(b) The number of prescription drugs that were subjected to an26
287+affordability review by the board pursuant to section 10-16-1406,27
288+1225
289+-8- including the results of each affordability review; and the number and1
290+disposition of any appeals or judicial reviews of the board's decisions;2
291+(e) A summary of any appeals JUDICIAL REVIEWS of board3
292+decisions, that were considered by the board pursuant to section4
293+10-16-1408, including an indication of the outcome of any such appeal5
294+JUDICIAL REVIEW;6
295+SECTION 8. In Colorado Revised Statutes, amend 10-16-14167
296+as follows:8
297+10-16-1416. Repeal of part. This part 14 is repealed, effective9
298+September 1, 2026 SEPTEMBER 1, 2031. Before the repeal, the functions10
299+of the board are scheduled for review in accordance with section11
300+24-34-104.12
301+SECTION 9. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-104, repeal13
302+(27)(a)(XIX); and add (32)(a)(X) as follows:14
303+24-34-104. General assembly review of regulatory agencies15
304+and functions for repeal, continuation, or reestablishment - legislative16
305+declaration - repeal. (27) (a) The following agencies, functions, or both,17
306+are scheduled for repeal on September 1, 2026:18
307+(XIX) The Colorado prescription drug affordability review board19
308+created in section 10-16-1402.20
309+(32) (a) The following agencies, functions, or both, are scheduled21
310+for repeal on September 1, 2031:22
265311 (X) T
266-HE COLORADO PRESCRIPTION DRUG AFFORDABILITY REVIEW
267-BOARD CREATED IN SECTION
268-10-16-1402.
269-SECTION 10. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-113.5, amend
270-(2)(a)(III) and (2)(a)(IV); and add (2)(a)(V) as follows:
271-PAGE 7-HOUSE BILL 23-1225 10-16-113.5. Independent external review of adverse
272-determinations - legislative declaration - definitions - rules. (2) As used
273-in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
274-(a) "Adverse determination" means a denial of:
275-(III) A request for benefits on the grounds that the treatment or
276-services are experimental or investigational; or
277-(IV) A benefit as described in section 10-16-113 (1)(c); OR
278-(V) A REQUEST FOR BENEFITS FOR A PRESCRIPTION DRUG THAT IS
279-UNAVAILABLE IN THE STATE BECAUSE A MANUFACTURER HAS WITHDRAWN
280-THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG FROM SALE OR DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE STATE
281-UNDER SECTION
282-10-16-1412.
283-SECTION 11. Act subject to petition - effective date. Section 4
284-of this act takes effect January 1, 2025, and the remainder of this act takes
285-effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day
286-period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except that, if a
287-referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state
288-constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within
289-such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless
290-approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2024
291-PAGE 8-HOUSE BILL 23-1225 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of
292-the vote thereon by the governor; except that section 4 of this act takes
293-effect January 1, 2026.
294-____________________________ ____________________________
295-Julie McCluskie Steve Fenberg
296-SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF
297-OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE
298-____________________________ ____________________________
299-Robin Jones Cindi L. Markwell
300-CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF
301-OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE
302- APPROVED________________________________________
303- (Date and Time)
304- _________________________________________
305- Jared S. Polis
306- GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
307-PAGE 9-HOUSE BILL 23-1225
312+HE COLORADO PRESCRIPTION DRUG AFFORDABILITY REVIEW23
313+BOARD CREATED IN SECTION 10-16-1402.24
314+SECTION 10. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-113.5,25
315+amend (2)(a)(III) and (2)(a)(IV); and add (2)(a)(V) as follows:26
316+10-16-113.5. Independent external review of adverse27
317+1225
318+-9- determinations - legislative declaration - definitions - rules. (2) As1
319+used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:2
320+(a) "Adverse determination" means a denial of:3
321+(III) A request for benefits on the grounds that the treatment or4
322+services are experimental or investigational; or5
323+(IV) A benefit as described in section 10-16-113 (1)(c);
324+OR6
325+(V) A
326+ REQUEST FOR BENEFITS FOR A PRESCRIPTION DRUG THAT IS7
327+UNAVAILABLE IN THE STATE BECAUSE A M ANUFACTURER HAS WITHDRAWN8
328+THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG FROM SALE OR DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE STATE9
329+UNDER SECTION 10-16-1412.10
330+SECTION 11. Act subject to petition - effective date. Section11
331+4 of this act takes effect January 1, 2025, and the remainder of this act12
332+takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the13
333+ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except14
334+that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V15
335+of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this16
336+act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take17
337+effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in18
338+November 2024 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the19
339+official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor; except that20
340+section 4 of this act takes effect January 1, 2026.21
341+1225
342+-10-