Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB059

Introduced
1/19/23  
Refer
1/19/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Refer
3/28/23  
Report Pass
4/6/23  
Refer
4/6/23  
Engrossed
4/13/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/17/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Report Pass
5/1/23  
Refer
5/1/23  
Report Pass
5/2/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Engrossed
5/16/23  
Engrossed
5/17/23  
Enrolled
5/17/23  

Caption

State Parks And Wildlife Area Local Access Funding

Impact

The bill will amend Colorado Revised Statutes by establishing processes for local governments to request additional fees for daily vehicle passes, potentially impacting state laws regarding how parks are funded and maintained. The planned fee will not exceed two dollars initially, with adjustments for inflation every five years. These funds will support local roadway and transportation infrastructure necessary for accessing state parks, thereby enhancing the overall outdoor experience for visitors.

Summary

Senate Bill 23-059 concerns providing funding to local governments to support access to state-owned outdoor recreational areas in Colorado. The bill recognizes the rapid increase in demand for outdoor recreation and the challenges this poses to local governments in maintaining access. It aims to establish a fee on daily vehicle passes used to access state parks, which would be implemented by July 1, 2024. This fee is intended to help alleviate the financial burden on local governments that share the state's goals of ensuring outdoor accessibility for families.

Sentiment

There is general support for the bill as it addresses the growing demand for outdoor recreation while also providing necessary funds to local governments. Supporters argue that this initiative will help ease the financial stresses associated with increased visitor traffic to state parks. However, some concerns may arise about the implementation and management of these fees, including whether local governments can efficiently utilize the funds for intended improvements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the management of the fees collected and the potential for the cost to deter visitors who may hesitate to pay additional charges to access parks. Critics might argue that relying on such fees could exacerbate inequities in access to outdoor recreation areas, especially for low-income families. The bill does allow local governments that have multiple access routes to negotiate agreements on how to distribute the fee revenue, raising questions about fair distribution and effective collaboration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

TX SB2096

Relating to the creation of and the powers of a comprehensive multimodal urban transportation authority, including the power to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited eminent domain authority.