Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB274

Introduced
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Engrossed
4/24/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Engrossed
5/9/23  
Engrossed
5/10/23  
Enrolled
5/10/23  

Caption

Water Quality Control Fee-setting By Rule

Impact

The impact of SB274 could be significant in terms of state laws and community water management. By allowing the Water Quality Control Commission to set fees, the bill places a renewed focus on maintaining and improving water quality across Colorado. This centralization is expected to create more uniformity in fee schedules and enhance public health outcomes. Additionally, the establishment of the clean water cash fund is designed to ensure dedicated funding for ongoing water quality initiatives and regulatory compliance, which could improve the efficiency of public water systems.

Summary

Senate Bill 274 focuses on water quality regulations in Colorado, specifically transferring fee-setting authority to the Water Quality Control Commission. This legislation aims to streamline the fee structures associated with drinking water and wastewater management, allowing for a more responsive approach to water quality governance. The bill seeks to establish a clean water cash fund which will facilitate ongoing funding for the administration and implementation of related environmental acts. Through these changes, the bill emphasizes the importance of environmental health and compliance at both state and local levels.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB274 has been mixed, reflecting the balance between regulatory oversight and the need for efficient water management. Supporters argue that empowering the Water Quality Control Commission to set fees will foster a more integrated and effective approach to water quality issues. However, critics express concerns about the potential for increased costs for consumers and businesses due to new fees. This debate highlights the contentious nature of environmental regulation and the ongoing struggle to reconcile economic and ecological priorities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specific details of fee structures and the broader implications of increased regulatory authority. Some stakeholders are apprehensive that transferring fee-setting powers might lead to excessive financial burdens on small communities and local governments. Others argue that without a clear regulatory framework, there could be loopholes or inefficiencies in water quality management. Addressing these concerns will be critical as the bill is implemented and as stakeholders navigate the evolving landscape of water regulation in Colorado.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2727

County water authority; Harquahala INA

CO SB258

Consolidate Colorado Educator Programs In Colorado Department of Education

CO HB1270

Change Term Name-based Criminal History Record Check

CO SB198

Regulated Natural Medicine Implementation

CO SB133

Provide Security For Certain Elected Officials

CO HB1399

Discounted Care for Indigent Patients

CO SB119

Measures to Modify the Department of Early Childhood

CO HB1285

Veterinary Workforce Requirements