Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1030

Introduced
1/10/24  
Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Refer
1/10/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Report Pass
3/15/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Report Pass
3/15/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Refer
3/15/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Refer
4/8/24  
Report Pass
4/26/24  
Report Pass
4/26/24  
Refer
4/26/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Engrossed
5/9/24  
Engrossed
5/9/24  
Engrossed
5/9/24  
Passed
5/10/24  
Enrolled
5/9/24  

Caption

Railroad Safety Requirements

Impact

HB1030 impacts various aspects of state laws concerning rail operations, particularly in how railroads manage hazardous materials and respond to incidents. Specifically, the legislation mandates annual reporting requirements for railroads regarding safety technologies, incident response preparedness, and environmental protections. This comprehensive approach is designed to mitigate risks associated with railroad operations, particularly in vulnerable communities that may be disproportionately affected by rail accidents.

Summary

House Bill 1030 focuses on enhancing rail safety standards in Colorado, addressing the increasing importance of railroad transportation in economic activities while ensuring the protection of residents and the environment against hazardous materials transported by trains. The bill mandates the creation of the Office of Rail Safety and establishes the Community Rail Safety Advisory Committee, aiming to bring diverse stakeholders together to evaluate and improve rail safety measures across the state. Additionally, the bill emphasizes the need for advanced technology, like wayside detectors to prevent accidents and promote safe rail operations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around Bill HB1030 appears to be positive among its supporters, who argue that it is a necessary step for protecting public health and safety. Advocates include environmental organizations and labor representatives who highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability from rail companies. However, there are concerns regarding the financial implications for railroads and potential compliance costs, which could lead to pushback from industry stakeholders who may view the regulations as burdensome.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB1030 revolve around the balance between regulatory oversight and operational flexibility for rail companies. Stakeholders have expressed concerns about the feasibility of some of the proposed safety requirements and the funding necessary to meet these standards. Further discussions are anticipated around how the bill will be implemented effectively, especially regarding the powers of the newly established advisory committee and its role in overseeing rail safety initiatives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO SB162

Railroad Safety Requirements

NJ A4460

Provides certain requirements concerning railroad safety.

PA HB1191

In railroads, providing for prohibition on blocking of crossings, for limitation on length of freight or work trains, for authorization to monitor safety practices and operations by collective bargaining representatives, for safe staffing levels for trains or light engines, for wayside detector systems, for study of transportation of hazardous materials or waste and for reporting system for transportation of hazardous materials or waste; and imposing penalties.

CA SB667

Railroads: safety: wayside detectors: train length: emergency vehicle crossing.

MD HB1446

Railroads - Safety Requirements (Maryland Railway Safety Act of 2024)

MD SB1060

Railroads - Safety Requirements (Maryland Railway Safety Act of 2024)

MD SB855

Railroads - Safety Requirements (Maryland Railway Safety Act of 2025)

MD HB958

Railroads - Safety Requirements (Maryland Railway Safety Act of 2025)