Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1143

Introduced
1/29/24  
Introduced
1/29/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Engrossed
2/15/24  
Refer
2/7/24  
Engrossed
2/15/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Refer
2/15/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Enrolled
3/25/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Enrolled
3/25/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Engrossed
4/8/24  
Engrossed
4/9/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Passed
4/19/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  

Caption

Construction Bidding Cost Thresholds for Department of Transportation Projects

Impact

The legislative intent behind HB 1143 is to enhance the efficiency of project management within the CDOT, especially for maintenance and repair projects. By raising the cost estimation threshold, the bill could lead to increased responsiveness in executing necessary projects that would not ordinarily be cost-effective to bid out. This shift may result in more direct oversight and potentially improved project outcomes when the department undertakes construction directly instead of through outside contractors.

Summary

House Bill 1143 aims to revise the cost thresholds for public projects undertaken by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Specifically, it proposes to increase the project cost cap for public works that do not require a competitive bidding process from $250,000 to $300,000 while allowing for annual adjustments based on inflation. This change intends to streamline the approval process for projects of a certain scale, enabling the department to address infrastructure needs more efficiently, particularly as costs and project scopes evolve over time.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears generally favorable, especially among proponents who argue it will empower the CDOT to act more flexibly and responsively under changing economic conditions. However, there are underlying concerns about accountability and fiscal responsibility regarding public funds, which may arise from reduced competitive bidding, a practice that traditionally fosters cost-effectiveness and transparency.

Contention

Notable points of contention within discussions of HB 1143 include potential impacts on local contractors who may lose out on opportunities due to the reduced bidding processes for larger projects. Critics express concerns that by increasing the cap and diminishing competitive bidding, the CDOT may inadvertently favor larger firms with more resources, thereby stifling competition and innovation in the local construction market. Moreover, there is the consideration of ensuring proper oversight to prevent any mismanagement of funds when project estimates surpass the newly established thresholds.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

TX SB2096

Relating to the creation of and the powers of a comprehensive multimodal urban transportation authority, including the power to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited eminent domain authority.