Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1305

Introduced
2/14/24  
Introduced
2/14/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/22/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/22/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Refer
3/22/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Enrolled
5/3/24  
Engrossed
5/2/24  
Passed
5/30/24  
Enrolled
5/3/24  

Caption

Changes for Concurrent Enrollment Students

Impact

The impact of HB 1305 on state laws involves amendments to existing statutes related to the operation and objectives of p-tech schools. It aims to ensure that students gain valuable academic credits that do not count against their lifetime credit-hour limitations. This broadened scope of what can be pursued in p-tech programs is intended to align more closely with the state's evolving workforce needs, thereby strengthening the relevance of high school education in preparing students for future careers.

Summary

House Bill 1305 proposes significant improvements to programs aimed at high school students who can earn postsecondary course credit while still enrolled in high school. Specifically, it focuses on the pathways in technology early college high school (p-tech) model, which has shown success in Colorado by providing a pathway for students to earn free associate degrees. The bill intends to modernize and enhance these programs by increasing flexibility, enabling students to engage in disciplines beyond traditional STEM fields, and recognizing their academic achievements as valuable in the workforce.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1305 appears largely positive, with support for its intent to provide better educational pathways for high school students. Advocates believe that by expanding the focus of p-tech programs, more students will be inclined to participate and benefit from higher education opportunities. However, some concerns remain regarding the implementation details and ensuring that these programs maintain quality and access for all students, particularly those in underserved communities.

Contention

While there is general support for the bill, notable points of contention could arise regarding specific program implementations and how to fund these enhancements. Advocates for educational equity may argue for stronger commitments to ensure that diverse populations can access the expanded opportunities, while critics might question the sustainability of funding for additional programs or the adequacy of training resources available to students in these new areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.