Colorado 2024 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB185

Introduced
3/19/24  
Introduced
3/19/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/12/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/12/24  
Refer
4/12/24  
Engrossed
4/17/24  
Engrossed
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/22/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/22/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Refer
4/22/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Engrossed
5/17/24  
Engrossed
5/17/24  
Engrossed
5/17/24  
Passed
5/22/24  
Enrolled
5/17/24  

Caption

Protections Mineral Interest Owners Forced Pooling

Impact

If enacted, SB185 will alter existing statutes regarding statutory pooling, which allows for mineral interests to be pooled for collective development. Under current law, unleased interests can be forced into pooling orders, often without extensive verification of consent from mineral owners. The bill introduces greater scrutiny and evidentiary requirements for operators seeking to pool interests, thereby potentially restoring public confidence in the oil and gas permitting process. Additionally, it stipulates that local governments are not to be affected unfavorably by forced pooling processes, reinforcing their autonomy and rights over local mineral interests.

Summary

Senate Bill 185, titled 'Protections for Unleased Mineral Interest Owners in the Pooling of Mineral Interests by the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission,' aims to adjust the regulatory processes surrounding forced pooling in Colorado. The bill seeks to enhance protections for mineral interest owners who have not signed voluntary leases by mandating that their interests cannot be developed without their consent or a specific state-ordered pooling. This adjustment emphasizes local government authority by ensuring they can determine the fate of their mineral interests, an aspect that has gained rising importance with increased local government involvement in mineral resource management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB185 is largely supportive, particularly among proponents who advocate for robust protections for local interests and greater oversight in the pooling process. However, some stakeholders express concerns about the potential implications for oil and gas operations, fearing that tighter regulations could hinder resource extraction and economic opportunities. The discussions reflect a balancing act between protecting community rights and sustaining economic development in the energy sector.

Contention

A notable point of contention involves the definition and authority of local governments in the context of mineral resource management. Critics of forced pooling argue that it undermines local decision-making and can lead to unwanted development within communities. SB185 attempts to mitigate these concerns by ensuring that local governments retain control over their unleased mineral interests. The expected debate surrounding the bill will likely focus on finding a compromise that satisfies both environmental protection advocates and the economic interests of the oil and gas industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WI SB172

Prohibiting filing or recording contracts for services or materials that do not improve real estate and providing a penalty. (FE)

WI AB157

Prohibiting filing or recording contracts for services or materials that do not improve real estate and providing a penalty. (FE)

CA SB696

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts: housing: underutilized or deteriorated retail property: covenants and restrictions: eminent domain.

CA SB261

Common interest developments: governance.

TX SB2505

Relating to the powers, duties, and governance of the Westwood Magnolia Parkway Improvement District; providing authority to impose taxes and issue bonds.

TX HB4714

Relating to the powers, duties, and governance of the Westwood Magnolia Parkway Improvement District; providing authority to impose taxes and issue bonds.

CA AB1345

Residential Exclusive Listing Agreements Act.

CA SB196

Property taxes: community land trust.