Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1094

Introduced
1/27/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Report Pass
3/7/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Engrossed
3/20/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Enrolled
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  
Enrolled
5/13/25  

Caption

Pharmacy Benefit Manager Practices

Impact

The legislation introduces several provisions that require PBMs to disclose clear and accurate pricing information to health benefit plans. This includes limitations on income derived from drug markups, copayments, and other cost-related practices. Moreover, it enables health benefit plans to conduct annual audits to ensure compliance with the newly established rules, which may significantly alter the operational dynamics between PBMs and health insurers. By mandating transparency, HB 1094 aims to empower consumers and payers through access to increased information about prescription drug pricing.

Summary

House Bill 1094 addresses the practices of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with the aim of regulating their impact on the cost of prescription drugs. The bill mandates that PBMs cannot earn income based on the pricing or cost of prescription drugs, thus promoting transparency and ethical practices in the management of drug benefits. By restricting PBM revenue sources, the bill seeks to lower drug costs for consumers and health benefit plans alike, fostering a more equitable landscape for prescription drug pricing.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1094 appears largely positive among consumer advocacy groups and some legislators who view it as a necessary step toward combating rising prescription drug costs. Supporters argue that the bill will level the playing field for pharmacies and consumers, allowing for better pricing strategies. However, opponents of the bill, including certain stakeholders within the pharmaceutical industry, express concerns over the potential limitations on PBM operations and the implications of reduced flexibility in managing drug formularies.

Contention

Notable points of contention stem from the balance between regulation and market freedom for PBMs. Critics of the bill argue that overly stringent regulations might disrupt the cost-management strategies employed by PBMs, potentially leading to unintended consequences that could harm consumers in other ways. The legislation reflects an ongoing debate surrounding pharmaceutical pricing and the role of PBMs in the health care system, highlighting the complexities of ensuring fair access to medications while managing costs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB149

Controlled substances: prescriptions.

TX SB594

Relating to the regulation of prescriptions for controlled substances, including certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2246

Relating to certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.