Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1291

Introduced
2/28/25  
Refer
2/28/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Engrossed
4/17/25  
Refer
4/17/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Enrolled
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  
Enrolled
5/13/25  

Caption

Transportation Network Company Consumer Protection

Impact

If enacted, HB 1291 will significantly alter state laws related to TNC operations, particularly through the introduction of new safety and consumer protection measures. It requires TNCs to develop policies to guard against sexual and physical assault, among other offenses. Additionally, the bill holds companies accountable for data management and requires enhanced transparency regarding driver training and safety protocols. The bill also aims to eliminate any contract provisions that waive a rider's rights relating to safety and misconduct accusations, representing a significant shift toward greater accountability in the industry.

Summary

House Bill 1291 focuses on enhancing consumer protections within the realm of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs). This bill mandates certain regulations aimed at ensuring the safety and security of both riders and drivers in the TNC ecosystem. Key provisions include establishing requirements for audio and video recording of prearranged rides, enhancing driver verification processes through criminal background checks, and instituting strict penalties for violations of safety protocols. The legislation aims to create a safer and more accountable environment within the rapidly growing sector of transportation services.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 1291 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocacy groups focused on consumer protection and safety. Proponents argue that the legislation is long overdue, particularly given reports of safety incidents and the lack of substantial reforms within the TNC sector. However, some stakeholders in the transportation industry express concerns about the potential increase in operational costs and regulatory burdens that could arise from the new compliance requirements, thus indicating a mixed reception from those impacted by the bill.

Contention

A notable point of contention in the discussions around HB 1291 lies in the balance between ensuring safety and maintaining operational feasibility for TNCs. Critics argue that while the intent to increase safety is commendable, the implementation of stringent recording and reporting requirements may impose undue burdens on transportation companies. Additionally, the confidentiality of recordings and data privacy has raised concerns about how such footage will be managed and the potential for misuse. These debates highlight the ongoing struggle to find an adequate balance between consumer rights and business interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO HB1089

Rideshares And Uninsured Motorist Insurance Coverage

CO SB117

Reduce Transportation Costs Imposed by Government

CT SB01487

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

CT SB01448

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Drivers.

CT HB07126

An Act Regulating Transportation Network Companies And Taxicabs.

NJ S1634

Requires transportation network companies to share information concerning sexual misconduct investigation of driver; authorizes transportation network company to ban drivers from accessing digital network during and following investigation.

CT HB05470

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

NJ A5262

Requires all transportation network company drivers to use electric vehicles beginning January 1, 2035.