Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07126

Introduced
2/22/17  
Introduced
2/22/17  
Refer
2/22/17  
Report Pass
3/15/17  
Report Pass
3/15/17  
Refer
3/24/17  
Refer
3/24/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Report Pass
5/15/17  
Report Pass
5/15/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Enrolled
6/20/17  
Enrolled
6/20/17  

Caption

An Act Regulating Transportation Network Companies And Taxicabs.

Impact

The enactment of HB 07126 would significantly alter existing transportation laws, emphasizing a more structured framework for the oversight of both TNCs and traditional taxicabs. This includes obligatory insurance requirements aimed at protecting drivers and riders against liabilities and accidents. A notable provision is the inclusion of fare transparency measures, which will help riders have a clear understanding of costs beforehand, thereby fostering a more competitive and fair market between TNCs and traditional taxi services.

Summary

House Bill 07126 aims to regulate transportation network companies (TNCs) and taxicabs, establishing clear standards for their operation and ensuring safety protocols are implemented. The bill sets forth requirements for companies to disclose insurance coverage to drivers and riders while connected to the digital network or engaged in providing rides. Moreover, it hinges upon maintaining safety by mandating background checks for TNC drivers and ensures vehicles meet specific safety standards, contributing to an overall safer transportation environment for both drivers and passengers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 07126 varies, with supporters praising the bill for bringing much-needed accountability and safety to the TNC sector. Many advocacy groups emphasize that such regulations are crucial for protecting consumers. Conversely, there are concerns from some stakeholders, particularly within the TNC industry, who worry that stringent regulations may hinder operational flexibility and innovation, potentially leading to increased fares and fewer service options for customers.

Contention

There are notable points of contention related to the bill, especially regarding its implications for insurance coverage and the operational limitations it places on TNCs. Critics argue that the high insurance requirements may disproportionately affect smaller TNCs, limiting competition. Furthermore, the dynamic pricing regulations that prevent excessive price increases during emergencies have raised debates about market manipulation and the balance between safety and profit margins for these companies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05523

An Act Concerning Insurance Requirements For Transportation Network Companies.

CT SB01448

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Drivers.

CT SB01487

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

CT HB07243

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Company Safety And Security Policies.

TX HB1733

Relating to automobile liability insurance for transportation network company drivers.

TX HB2039

Relating to automobile liability insurance for digital network company drivers.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB251

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.