Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB007

Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Engrossed
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/5/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Enrolled
5/7/25  
Enrolled
5/13/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  
Engrossed
5/13/25  

Caption

Increase Prescribed Burns

Impact

The implementation of SB007 is expected to significantly impact state laws related to wildfire management and land use. By creating a dedicated fund and establishing a clear process for prescribed burns, the bill not only supports fire prevention efforts but also offers financial security for those who carry out these burns. This means that stakeholders, such as local governments and landowners, can engage in prescribed burns with reduced financial risk, ultimately promoting better land management practices and enhancing environmental stewardship in Colorado.

Summary

Senate Bill 007 aims to increase the use of prescribed burns in Colorado as a means of wildfire management. The bill establishes the Prescribed Fire Claims Cash Fund, which will provide financial assistance to support prescribed burns and mitigate the costs associated with their execution. By facilitating these burns, the bill focuses on reducing the risks of uncontrolled wildfires and enhancing the management of wildland areas. The legislation outlines the requirements for certified prescribed burn managers and aims to create a structured process for the execution and financial claims related to prescribed burns.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB007 appears to be largely positive among environmental advocates, who view prescribed burns as a necessary tool for managing ecosystems and reducing wildfire risks. However, there are concerns from some community members regarding the safety and environmental impacts of such burns. The discourse highlights a balancing act between fostering proactive fire management practices and ensuring community safety and ecological compatibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to the bill include worries about the potential for prescribed burns to inadvertently escape control, leading to uncontrollable wildfires. Some critics argue that the bill may not adequately address the concerns around public safety and long-term ecological impacts. Additionally, discussions regarding the regulations governing certified burners and financial qualifications for accessing the Prescribed Fire Claims Cash Fund reflect broader concerns about accountability and oversight within wildfire management practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2585

Prescribed burns: burn managers: liability.

CA AB771

Burning of forest lands: forest land owners.

CA AB1998

Opioids: safe prescribing policy.

CA SB926

Prescribed Fire Liability Pilot Program: Prescribed Fire Claims Fund.

CA AB1353

Health care coverage: prescription drugs: continuity of care.

CA SB675

Prescribed grazing: local assistance grant program: Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force.

CA AB2352

Prescription drug coverage.

CA AB2091

Fire prevention: prescribed burns: insurance pool.