Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB145

Introduced
2/5/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Report Pass
3/13/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Engrossed
3/25/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/16/25  
Refer
4/16/25  
Enrolled
4/25/25  
Engrossed
5/1/25  
Engrossed
5/2/25  

Caption

Online Cancellation of Automatic Renewal Contracts

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to alter the landscape of consumer contracts in Colorado, particularly affecting online businesses that utilize automatic renewal strategies. By requiring a straightforward cancellation process accessible online, the law conveys a message of consumer empowerment. It obliges companies to be transparent about their cancellation policies and may lead to a reevaluation of how businesses approach customer contracts to remain compliant. Consequently, this could also foster a more consumer-friendly business environment in the digital marketplace.

Summary

Senate Bill 145 aims to strengthen consumer rights in relation to automatic renewal contracts in Colorado. This legislation mandates that businesses offering such contracts must provide an easy and efficient mechanism for consumers to cancel these agreements online. The bill defines a 'one-step online cancellation' process, ensuring that consumers can terminate their contracts without facing unnecessary barriers. If enacted, this bill would significantly enhance consumer protection, allowing individuals to manage their subscription services with greater transparency and ease.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB145 appears to be favorable among consumer advocacy groups and many legislators. Supporters argue that the bill addresses widespread issues consumers face with unwanted automatic renewals, empowering them to make informed choices and easily cancel services they no longer wish to subscribe to. However, there may be resistance from businesses that typically rely on automatic renewals as a revenue strategy, concerned that the requirements could complicate their operations or reduce customer retention. Still, the overall discussion indicates a strong support for consumer rights enhancements.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB145 include the balance between protecting consumers and preserving business models that depend on automatic renewal contracts. Critics argue that the bill could create additional burdens on businesses, especially smaller firms that may struggle to implement the necessary changes. Moreover, discussions may revolve around the implications of enforced cancellation policies on revenue stability for companies reliant on these contracts. Despite these concerns, advocates emphasize the importance of consumer protections, suggesting that the legislation could actually benefit businesses long-term through increased trust and customer satisfaction.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.