44 | 41 | | Shading denotes HOUSE amendment. Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment. |
---|
45 | 42 | | Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law. |
---|
46 | 43 | | Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law. past the date of the expiration of the timely filing period. The bill allows |
---|
47 | 44 | | the state department to review claims that fall outside of this 3-year time |
---|
48 | 45 | | frame only if required by a federal audit. |
---|
49 | 46 | | The bill limits the number of audits a provider may undergo each |
---|
50 | 47 | | year and limits the number of medical records that can be requested for |
---|
51 | 48 | | a given audit. |
---|
52 | 49 | | If the state department identifies preliminary findings during the |
---|
53 | 50 | | RAC audit, the state department must send the provider a report detailing |
---|
54 | 51 | | the preliminary findings, the rationale for the preliminary findings, and |
---|
55 | 52 | | the methodology for how any overpayments were calculated and |
---|
56 | 53 | | determined. |
---|
57 | 54 | | The bill allows a provider that received preliminary findings |
---|
58 | 55 | | following a complex audit to request an exit conference to discuss the |
---|
59 | 56 | | preliminary findings with the state department in an effort to resolve the |
---|
60 | 57 | | concerns detailed in the preliminary findings prior to undergoing an |
---|
61 | 58 | | informal reconsideration of the preliminary findings. |
---|
62 | 59 | | The bill requires a provider to participate in an informal |
---|
63 | 60 | | reconsideration before filing a formal appeal regarding the state |
---|
64 | 61 | | department's findings during a RAC audit. |
---|
65 | 62 | | The bill, in the department of health care policy and financing for |
---|
66 | 63 | | medical and long-term care services for medical-eligible individuals |
---|
67 | 64 | | budget, decreases the cash funds appropriation from recoveries and |
---|
68 | 65 | | recoupments by $20,900,588 and the cash funds appropriation from the |
---|
69 | 66 | | recovery audit contractor recoveries cash fund is increased by |
---|
70 | 67 | | $20,900,588. |
---|
71 | 68 | | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:1 |
---|
72 | 69 | | SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 25.5-4-301, amend2 |
---|
73 | 70 | | (3.5)(c); repeal (3)(a)(IX); and add (3.3) as follows:3 |
---|
74 | 71 | | 25.5-4-301. Recoveries - overpayments - penalties - interest -4 |
---|
75 | 72 | | adjustments - liens - review or audit procedures - cash fund - rules -5 |
---|
76 | 73 | | definitions - repeal. (3) (a) A review or audit of a provider is subject to6 |
---|
77 | 74 | | the following procedures:7 |
---|
78 | 75 | | (IX) For audits conducted pursuant to 42 CFR 455.506, at least |
---|
79 | 76 | | 8 |
---|
80 | 77 | | quarterly, the state department shall publish on its website an audit9 |
---|
81 | 78 | | activity report detailing current and recently completed audits and reviews10 |
---|
82 | 79 | | and summaries of the findings of such audits and reviews, including the11 |
---|
83 | 80 | | 314-2- number and amounts of overpayments and underpayments found, the1 |
---|
84 | 81 | | number and results of appeals, the amounts collected, and the error rates2 |
---|
85 | 82 | | identified. At least quarterly, the state department shall conduct trainings3 |
---|
86 | 83 | | for providers and hold stakeholder meetings regarding audits and reviews.4 |
---|
87 | 84 | | In addition, when the state department enters into contracts pursuant to5 |
---|
88 | 85 | | this subsection (3)(a), the state department shall publish on its website a6 |
---|
89 | 86 | | copy of the contract, scope of work, and information regarding7 |
---|
90 | 87 | | supervision of contractor deliverables.8 |
---|
91 | 88 | | (3.3) (a) A |
---|
92 | 89 | | S USED IN THIS SUBSECTION (3.3), UNLESS THE CONTEXT9 |
---|
93 | 90 | | OTHERWISE REQUIRES:10 |
---|
94 | 91 | | (I) "A |
---|
95 | 92 | | UTOMATED AUDIT" MEANS A RAC AUDIT THAT REVIEWS A11 |
---|
96 | 93 | | PROVIDER'S APPLICATION OF CODING RULES AND DOES NOT REQUIRE A12 |
---|
97 | 94 | | PROVIDER TO SUBMIT MEDICAL RECORDS TO BE AUDITED .13 |
---|
98 | 95 | | (II) "C |
---|
99 | 96 | | OMPLEX AUDIT" MEANS A RAC AUDIT THAT REQUIRES A14 |
---|
100 | 97 | | PROVIDER TO SUBMIT MEDICAL RECORDS TO BE AUDITED , WHICH ARE15 |
---|
101 | 98 | | INDIVIDUALLY REVIEWED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STATE16 |
---|
102 | 99 | | DEPARTMENT OR THE STATE DEPARTMENT 'S RAC VENDOR.17 |
---|
103 | 100 | | (III) "D |
---|
104 | 101 | | ENIAL RATE" MEANS THE PERCENTAGE OF REVIEWED18 |
---|
105 | 102 | | CLAIMS ULTIMATELY DETERMINED TO INVOLVE IMPROPER PAYMENTS19 |
---|
106 | 103 | | AFTER ALL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES ARE COMPLETE , INCLUDING THE20 |
---|
107 | 104 | | RESOLUTION OF AN APPEAL.21 |
---|
108 | 105 | | (IV) "RAC |
---|
109 | 106 | | AUDIT" MEANS A RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTOR22 |
---|
110 | 107 | | AUDIT CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL "SOCIAL SECURITY ACT",23 |
---|
111 | 108 | | 42 |
---|
112 | 109 | | U.S.C. SEC. 1396a (a)(42)(B).24 |
---|
113 | 110 | | (V) "RAC |
---|
114 | 111 | | VENDOR" MEANS A VENDOR WHO MEETS THE25 |
---|
115 | 112 | | REQUIREMENTS OF 42 CFR 455.508 AND CONTRACTS WITH THE STATE26 |
---|
116 | 113 | | DEPARTMENT TO PERFORM RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTOR AUDITS OF27 |
---|
117 | 114 | | 314 |
---|
118 | 115 | | -3- PROVIDERS ON BEHALF OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT .1 |
---|
119 | 116 | | (b) T |
---|
120 | 117 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT MAY SOLICIT THE SERVICES OF A RAC2 |
---|
121 | 118 | | VENDOR THR OUGH A CONTRACT ISSUED PURS UANT TO THE3 |
---|
122 | 119 | | "P |
---|
123 | 120 | | ROCUREMENT CODE", ARTICLES 101 TO 112 OF TITLE 24, AND PURSUANT4 |
---|
124 | 121 | | TO THE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS DETAILED IN 42 CFR 455.508, FOR THE5 |
---|
125 | 122 | | PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING RAC AUDITS OF PROVIDERS TO IDENTIFY6 |
---|
126 | 123 | | POSSIBLE MEDICAID OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS .7 |
---|
127 | 124 | | (c) (I) T |
---|
128 | 125 | | HE CONTRACT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (3.3)(b) OF THIS8 |
---|
129 | 126 | | SECTION MUST STATE THAT THE RAC VENDOR'S COMPENSATION IS9 |
---|
130 | 127 | | CONTINGENT UPON THE AMOUNT OF OVERPAYMENTS THE STATE RECOVERS10 |
---|
131 | 128 | | FROM A PROVIDER. AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE CURRENT CONTRACT11 |
---|
132 | 129 | | BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE RAC VENDOR, THE STATE12 |
---|
133 | 130 | | DEPARTMENT SHALL ESTABLISH CONTINGENCY FEE RATES BASED ON13 |
---|
134 | 131 | | MARKET RATES DETERMINED BY THE RESULTS OF A COMPETITIVE14 |
---|
135 | 132 | | PROCUREMENT PROCESS AND MAY NEGOTIATE LOWER RATES AS THE15 |
---|
136 | 133 | | MARKET PROVIDES, WITH CONTINGENCY RATES NOT TO EXCEED SIXTEEN16 |
---|
137 | 134 | | PERCENT OF RECOVERED PAYMENTS . THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL17 |
---|
138 | 135 | | ENSURE THAT THE CONTINGENCY FEE REQUIREMENTS ARE ADHERED TO18 |
---|
139 | 136 | | THROUGH EFFECTIVE MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE RAC19 |
---|
140 | 137 | | VENDOR'S PERFORMANCE. FOR CONTRACTS ENTERED INTO AFTER THE20 |
---|
141 | 138 | | EXPIRATION OF THE CONTRACT THAT ESTABLISHED CONTINGENCY FEE21 |
---|
142 | 139 | | RATES FOR RAC VENDOR PAYMENTS, THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL22 |
---|
143 | 140 | | STRUCTURE THE RAC VENDOR COMPENSATION BASED ON A TIERED23 |
---|
144 | 141 | | PAYMENT SYSTEM THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE REQUIRED WORK UNLESS24 |
---|
145 | 142 | | DOING SO CONFLICTS WITH FEDERAL DIRECTIVES IN MEDICAID GUIDANCE25 |
---|
146 | 143 | | PURSUANT TO 42 CFR 455, SUBPART F, OR RESULTS IN AN UNFAVORABLE26 |
---|
147 | 144 | | IMPACT TO THE STATE'S GENERAL FUND.27 |
---|
148 | 145 | | 314 |
---|
149 | 146 | | -4- (II) WHEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT ENTERS INTO A CONTRACT1 |
---|
150 | 147 | | PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (3.3)(b) OF THIS SECTION, THE STATE2 |
---|
151 | 148 | | DEPARTMENT MUST PUBLISH ON ITS WEBSITE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT ,3 |
---|
152 | 149 | | SCOPE OF THE WORK, AND INFORMATION REGARDING SUPERVISION OF4 |
---|
153 | 150 | | CONTRACTOR DELIVERABLES .5 |
---|
154 | 151 | | (III) T |
---|
155 | 152 | | HE CONTRACT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (3.3)(b) OF THIS6 |
---|
156 | 153 | | SECTION MUST REQUIRE THE RAC VENDOR TO:7 |
---|
157 | 154 | | (A) C |
---|
158 | 155 | | ONDUCT INFORMAL CONFERENCES OR PHONE CALLS WITH8 |
---|
159 | 156 | | PROVIDERS OR PROVIDER ASSOCIATIONS TO DISCUSS THE RAC PROGRAM,9 |
---|
160 | 157 | | PROCESSES, AND FINDINGS;10 |
---|
161 | 158 | | (B) C |
---|
162 | 159 | | ONDUCT PROVIDER OUTREACH AND EDUCATION ACTIVITIES ,11 |
---|
163 | 160 | | INCLUDING NOTIFYING PROVIDERS OF AUDIT POLICIES , PROTOCOLS, AND12 |
---|
164 | 161 | | COMMON BILLING ERRORS;13 |
---|
165 | 162 | | (C) R |
---|
166 | 163 | | ESPOND TO PROVIDER QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS FOR14 |
---|
167 | 164 | | INFORMATION WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS AFTER RECEIVING THE15 |
---|
168 | 165 | | QUESTION OR REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ;16 |
---|
169 | 166 | | (D) R |
---|
170 | 167 | | ETURN, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, THE CONTINGENCY FEE17 |
---|
171 | 168 | | ASSOCIATED WITH INACCURATE AUDIT SCENARIOS THAT RESULTED IN18 |
---|
172 | 169 | | PROVIDER REFUNDS AS PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT ; AND19 |
---|
173 | 170 | | (E) P |
---|
174 | 171 | | ROVIDE PRELIMINARY RAC AUDIT FINDINGS TO A PROVIDER |
---|
175 | 172 | | 20 |
---|
176 | 173 | | WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF ANY REQUESTED21 |
---|
177 | 174 | | MEDICAL RECORDS, AS DETERMINED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT IN22 |
---|
178 | 175 | | COLLABORATION WITH THE PROVIDER ADVISORY GROUP , CREATED IN23 |
---|
179 | 176 | | SUBSECTION (3.5)(c)(I) OF THIS SECTION.24 |
---|
180 | 177 | | (d) T |
---|
181 | 178 | | HE RAC CONTRACT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (3.3)(b) OF25 |
---|
182 | 179 | | THIS SECTION MAY INCLUDE AN OPTION TO PAY THE RAC VENDOR TO26 |
---|
183 | 180 | | IDENTIFY UNDERPAYMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION IN FUTURE STATE27 |
---|
184 | 181 | | 314 |
---|
185 | 182 | | -5- DEPARTMENT BUDGET REQUESTS .1 |
---|
186 | 183 | | (e) (I) T |
---|
187 | 184 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL IMPLEMENT A PROCESS TO2 |
---|
188 | 185 | | VERIFY THAT THE RAC VENDOR'S STAFF WHO MAKE CLINICAL RAC AUDIT3 |
---|
189 | 186 | | FINDINGS ARE APPROPRIATELY LICENSED PURSUANT TO INDUSTRY4 |
---|
190 | 187 | | STANDARDS AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS , INCLUDING THAT THE RAC5 |
---|
191 | 188 | | VENDOR HIRE QUALIFIED CODERS AND THAT THE RAC VENDOR'S STAFF6 |
---|
192 | 189 | | WHO MAKE BILLING RAC AUDIT FINDINGS HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF MEDICAID7 |
---|
193 | 190 | | BILLING AND CODING RULES AND GUIDANCE ADOPTED BY THE STATE8 |
---|
194 | 191 | | DEPARTMENT.9 |
---|
195 | 192 | | (II) T |
---|
196 | 193 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST ENSURE THAT QUALIFIED10 |
---|
197 | 194 | | CODERS HAVE RELEVANT CREDENTIALS FOR THE TYPE OF MEDICAL11 |
---|
198 | 195 | | SERVICES BEING REVIEWED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS .12 |
---|
199 | 196 | | (III) A |
---|
200 | 197 | | NY COMPLEX AUDIT THAT REQUIRES A REVIEW OF MEDICAL13 |
---|
201 | 198 | | RECORDS MUST BE CONDUCTED BY LICENSED CLINICAL STAFF WITH14 |
---|
202 | 199 | | TRAINING AND COMPETENCY IN THE SPECIFIC TYPE OF COMPLEX AUDIT15 |
---|
203 | 200 | | BEING CONDUCTED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS .16 |
---|
204 | 201 | | P |
---|
205 | 202 | | ROVIDERS MUST MAKE ALL RELEVANT MEDICAL RECORDS AND17 |
---|
206 | 203 | | INFORMATION RELATED TO CLAIMS REVIEWED DURING THE COMPLEX18 |
---|
207 | 204 | | AUDIT AVAILABLE TO THE RAC VENDOR WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS19 |
---|
208 | 205 | | SPECIFIED IN THE INITIAL MEDICAL RECORDS REQUEST .20 |
---|
209 | 206 | | (IV) T |
---|
210 | 207 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL FULLY INFORM THE RAC21 |
---|
211 | 208 | | VENDOR OF ANY CHANGES TO THE STATE BILLING ST ANDARDS AND ENSURE22 |
---|
212 | 209 | | THAT THE VENDOR ONLY APPLIES BILLING STANDARDS THAT WERE IN23 |
---|
213 | 210 | | EFFECT AT THE SPECIFIED DATE OF SERVICE. THE STATE DEPARTMENT IS24 |
---|
214 | 211 | | RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT25 |
---|
215 | 212 | | AND TAKING APPROPRIATE ACTION TO ENSURE THE RAC VENDOR'S26 |
---|
216 | 213 | | COMPLIANCE.27 |
---|
217 | 214 | | 314 |
---|
218 | 215 | | -6- (V) THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL ENSURE THAT THE RAC1 |
---|
219 | 216 | | VENDOR COMPLIES WITH THE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN2 |
---|
220 | 217 | | SUBSECTION (3.3)(b) OF THIS SECTION AND CONDUCTS RAC AUDITS IN A3 |
---|
221 | 218 | | FAIR AND CONSISTENT MANNER .4 |
---|
222 | 219 | | (VI) T |
---|
223 | 220 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL ENSURE THAT THE RAC5 |
---|
224 | 221 | | VENDOR INCORPORATES INTO EACH AUDIT SCENARIO , WHETHER AN6 |
---|
225 | 222 | | AUTOMATED AUDIT OR A COMPLEX AUDIT , THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:7 |
---|
226 | 223 | | (A) F |
---|
227 | 224 | | EDERAL STATUTES AND BILLING RULES AND STANDARDS8 |
---|
228 | 225 | | THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE SPECIFIC PROVIDER DURING THE SPECIFIED9 |
---|
229 | 226 | | DATES OF SERVICE FOR EACH AUDIT;10 |
---|
230 | 227 | | (B) S |
---|
231 | 228 | | TATE STATUTES, BILLING RULES AND STANDARDS , AND11 |
---|
232 | 229 | | POLICIES AS DOCUMENTED IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT 'S PROVIDER BILLING12 |
---|
233 | 230 | | MANUALS AND PROVIDER BULLETINS , AS WELL AS IN PROGRAM GUIDANCE13 |
---|
234 | 231 | | AND DIRECTIVES EFFECTIVE FOR THE SPECIFIC PROVIDER DURING THE14 |
---|
235 | 232 | | SPECIFIED DATES OF SERVICE FOR EACH AUDIT; AND15 |
---|
236 | 233 | | (C) I |
---|
237 | 234 | | NPUT FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT 'S RAC STAFF AND16 |
---|
238 | 235 | | MEDICAL DIRECTOR, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER NECESSARY STATE17 |
---|
239 | 236 | | DEPARTMENT STAFF BASED ON THE STAFF 'S OR MEDICAL DIRECTOR'S18 |
---|
240 | 237 | | REVIEW OF THE AUDIT SCENARIO.19 |
---|
241 | 238 | | (VII) W |
---|
242 | 239 | | HEN AUDITING CLAIMS TO MAKE RAC AUDIT FINDINGS,20 |
---|
243 | 240 | | THE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST ENSURE THAT THE RAC VENDOR FOLLOWS21 |
---|
244 | 241 | | ALL RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE FEDERAL BILLING GUIDELINES ,22 |
---|
245 | 242 | | REQUIREMENTS SET BY THE MEDICAID BILLING MANUAL , STANDARD23 |
---|
246 | 243 | | CLINICAL GUIDELINES, AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL24 |
---|
247 | 244 | | RULES AND REGULATIONS.25 |
---|
248 | 245 | | (f) T |
---|
249 | 246 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL COMPREHENSIVELY REVIEW26 |
---|
250 | 247 | | ALL AUDIT TYPES PROPOSED BY THE RAC VENDOR AND MUST APPROVE ,27 |
---|
251 | 248 | | 314 |
---|
252 | 249 | | -7- ADJUST, OR REJECT EACH AUDIT TYPE BEFORE THE RAC VENDOR1 |
---|
253 | 250 | | CONDUCTS THE RAC AUDIT. WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE ROLLOUT2 |
---|
254 | 251 | | OF A NEW AUDIT, IF THE STATE DEPARTMENT, IN COLLABORATION WITH3 |
---|
255 | 252 | | PROVIDERS AND THE PROVIDER ADVISORY GROUP CREATED IN SUBSECTION4 |
---|
256 | 253 | | (3.5) |
---|
257 | 254 | | OF THIS SECTION, DETERMINES THAT THE AUDIT IS INACCURATE, THE5 |
---|
258 | 255 | | STATE DEPARTMENT MUST REFUND PROVIDERS WHO SUBMITTED6 |
---|
259 | 256 | | REPAYMENTS BASED ON INACCURATE AUDIT FINDINGS AND REQUIRE THE7 |
---|
260 | 257 | | RAC |
---|
261 | 258 | | VENDOR TO RETURN THE CONTINGENCY FEE ASSOCIATED WITH THE8 |
---|
262 | 259 | | PAYMENTS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS .9 |
---|
263 | 260 | | (g) T |
---|
264 | 261 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL REGULARLY REVIEW ACTIVE10 |
---|
265 | 262 | | RAC |
---|
266 | 263 | | AUDITS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE11 |
---|
267 | 264 | | REGULATION CHANGES AND POLICY UPDATES AND DISCONTINUE A RAC12 |
---|
268 | 265 | | AUDIT IF AND WHEN APPROPRIATE DUE TO A CHANGE IN FEDERAL OR STATE13 |
---|
269 | 266 | | REGULATION OR POLICY UPDATES .14 |
---|
270 | 267 | | (h) C |
---|
271 | 268 | | ONSISTENT WITH 42 CFR 455.508 (f), RAC AUDITS AND15 |
---|
272 | 269 | | REVIEWS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MUST NOT REVIEW16 |
---|
273 | 270 | | CLAIMS MORE THAN THREE YEARS AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE TIMELY17 |
---|
274 | 271 | | FILING PERIOD. THE STATE DEPARTMENT MAY CONDUCT A RAC AUDIT FOR18 |
---|
275 | 272 | | A CLAIM FILED MORE THAN THREE YEARS AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE19 |
---|
276 | 273 | | TIMELY FILING PERIOD IF REQUIRED BY A FEDERAL AUDIT THAT WOULD20 |
---|
277 | 274 | | OTHERWISE RESULT IN COSTS TO THE GENERAL FUND OR , IF DIRECTED BY21 |
---|
278 | 275 | | THE FEDERAL CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES , THE22 |
---|
279 | 276 | | U |
---|
280 | 277 | | NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , OR ANY23 |
---|
281 | 278 | | OTHER FEDERAL AGENCY. IF A RAC AUDIT IS INITIATED IN RESPONSE TO24 |
---|
282 | 279 | | A FEDERAL DIRECTIVE, THE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST PROVIDE NOTICE TO25 |
---|
283 | 280 | | AN IMPACTED PROVIDER AND INCLUDE THE REASON FOR THE RAC AUDIT26 |
---|
284 | 281 | | AND ANY RELEVANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE FEDERAL REQUIREMENT IN27 |
---|
285 | 282 | | 314 |
---|
286 | 283 | | -8- THE NOTICE.1 |
---|
287 | 284 | | (i) (I) T |
---|
288 | 285 | | HE RAC VENDOR SHALL NOT REQUIRE A PROVIDER TO2 |
---|
289 | 286 | | UNDERGO MORE THAN THREE COMPLEX AUDITS PER CALENDAR YEAR .3 |
---|
290 | 287 | | H |
---|
291 | 288 | | OSPITALS MUST BE GROUPED FOR COMPLEX AUDITS BASED ON THEIR4 |
---|
292 | 289 | | TOTAL MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT IN THE PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR , AND5 |
---|
293 | 290 | | GROUPINGS MUST BE DETERMINED USING STATE DATA AND PUBLISHED6 |
---|
294 | 291 | | ANNUALLY BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT .7 |
---|
295 | 292 | | (II) T |
---|
296 | 293 | | HE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF MEDICAL RECORD REQUESTS A8 |
---|
297 | 294 | | PROVIDER MAY RECEIVE EACH MONTH MUST BE CLEARLY COMMUNICATED9 |
---|
298 | 295 | | TO PROVIDERS AND REVIEWED ANNUALLY BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT .10 |
---|
299 | 296 | | T |
---|
300 | 297 | | HE RAC VENDOR SHALL NOT REQUEST MORE THAN THE FOLLOWING11 |
---|
301 | 298 | | NUMBER OF MEDICAL RECORDS PER HOSPITAL PER MONTH :12 |
---|
302 | 299 | | (A) S |
---|
303 | 300 | | IX HUNDRED FOR HOSPITALS WITH OVER TWO HUNDRED FIFTY13 |
---|
304 | 301 | | MILLION DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE ;14 |
---|
305 | 302 | | (B) F |
---|
306 | 303 | | OUR HUNDRED FOR HOSPITALS WITH BETWEEN SEVENTY15 |
---|
307 | 304 | | MILLION DOLLARS AND TWO HUNDRED FORTY -NINE MILLION NINE16 |
---|
308 | 305 | | HUNDRED NINETY-NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY -NINE DOLLARS17 |
---|
309 | 306 | | IN MEDICAID REVENUE;18 |
---|
310 | 307 | | (C) T |
---|
311 | 308 | | WO HUNDRED FOR HOSPITALS WITH BETWEEN FORTY MILLION19 |
---|
312 | 309 | | DOLLARS AND SIXTY -NINE MILLION NINE HUNDRED NINETY -NINE20 |
---|
313 | 310 | | THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY -NINE DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE;21 |
---|
314 | 311 | | (D) O |
---|
315 | 312 | | NE HUNDRED FOR HOSPITALS WITH BETWEEN TWENTY22 |
---|
316 | 313 | | MILLION DOLLARS AND THIRTY-NINE MILLION NINE HUNDRED NINETY-NINE23 |
---|
317 | 314 | | THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY -NINE DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE;24 |
---|
318 | 315 | | (E) F |
---|
319 | 316 | | IFTY FOR HOSPITALS WITH BETWEEN TEN MILLION DOLLARS25 |
---|
320 | 317 | | AND NINETEEN MILLION NINE HUNDRED NINETY -NINE THOUSAND NINE26 |
---|
321 | 318 | | HUNDRED NINETY-NINE DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE ;27 |
---|
322 | 319 | | 314 |
---|
323 | 320 | | -9- (F) TWENTY-FIVE FOR HOSPITALS WITH BETWEEN ONE MILLION1 |
---|
324 | 321 | | DOLLARS AND NINE MILLION NINE HUNDRED NINETY -NINE THOUSAND NINE2 |
---|
325 | 322 | | HUNDRED NINETY-NINE DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE ;3 |
---|
326 | 323 | | (G) T |
---|
327 | 324 | | WENTY FOR HOSPITALS WITH UNDER ONE MILLION DOLLARS4 |
---|
328 | 325 | | IN MEDICAID REVENUE; AND5 |
---|
329 | 326 | | (H) T |
---|
330 | 327 | | EN FOR OUT-OF-STATE FACILITIES.6 |
---|
331 | 328 | | (III) T |
---|
332 | 329 | | HE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBSECTION (3.3)(i) DO NOT7 |
---|
333 | 330 | | APPLY IF:8 |
---|
334 | 331 | | (A) F |
---|
335 | 332 | | EDERAL MEDICAID DIRECTIVES REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 429 |
---|
336 | 333 | | CFR |
---|
337 | 334 | | 455, SUBPART F, REQUIRE A HIGHER LEVEL OF CLAIM AUDITS;10 |
---|
338 | 335 | | (B) A |
---|
339 | 336 | | N AGENCY OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REQUIRES , IN11 |
---|
340 | 337 | | WRITING, THE STATE DEPARTMENT TO INITIATE ADDITIONAL AUDIT12 |
---|
341 | 338 | | ACTIVITY; OR13 |
---|
342 | 339 | | (C) A |
---|
343 | 340 | | FEDERAL AUDIT IDENTIFIES ADDITIONAL PROVIDER FINDINGS14 |
---|
344 | 341 | | THAT IMPACT THE STATE GENERAL FUND AND THAT SHOULD BE15 |
---|
345 | 342 | | APPROPRIATELY RECOVERED FROM THAT PROVIDER THROUGH AN16 |
---|
346 | 343 | | ADDITIONAL RAC AUDIT AND ITS RECOUPMENTS.17 |
---|
347 | 344 | | (j) (I) T |
---|
348 | 345 | | HE RAC VENDOR SHALL NOT REQUIRE A PROVIDER TO18 |
---|
349 | 346 | | UNDERGO MORE THAN FOUR AUTOMATED AUDITS PER CALENDAR YEAR .19 |
---|
350 | 347 | | P |
---|
351 | 348 | | ROVIDERS MUST BE GROUPED FOR AUTOMATED AUDITS BASED ON THEIR20 |
---|
352 | 349 | | TOTAL MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT IN THE PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR , AND21 |
---|
353 | 350 | | GROUPINGS MUST BE DETERMINED USING STATE DATA AND PUBLISHED22 |
---|
354 | 351 | | ANNUALLY.23 |
---|
355 | 352 | | (II) T |
---|
356 | 353 | | HE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PROVIDER CLAIMS ACROSS ALL OF24 |
---|
357 | 354 | | A PROVIDER'S LOCATIONS FOR A GIVEN CALENDAR YEAR THAT UNDERGO25 |
---|
358 | 355 | | AUTOMATED AUDITS MUST NOT EXCEED :26 |
---|
359 | 356 | | (A) 2.92 |
---|
360 | 357 | | PERCENT FOR PROVIDERS WITH OVER TEN MILLION27 |
---|
361 | 358 | | 314 |
---|
362 | 359 | | -10- DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE ;1 |
---|
363 | 360 | | (B) 2.50 |
---|
364 | 361 | | PERCENT FOR PROVIDERS WITH BETWEEN FOUR MILLION2 |
---|
365 | 362 | | DOLLARS AND TEN MILLION DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE ;3 |
---|
366 | 363 | | (C) 2.08 |
---|
367 | 364 | | PERCENT FOR PROVIDERS WITH BETWEEN ONE MILLION4 |
---|
368 | 365 | | DOLLARS AND THREE MILLION NINE HUNDRED NINETY -NINE THOUSAND5 |
---|
369 | 366 | | NINE HUNDRED NINETY-NINE DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE ; AND6 |
---|
370 | 367 | | (D) 1.67 |
---|
371 | 368 | | PERCENT FOR PROVIDERS WITH LESS THAN ONE MILLION7 |
---|
372 | 369 | | DOLLARS IN MEDICAID REVENUE .8 |
---|
373 | 370 | | (III) A |
---|
374 | 371 | | FTER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS IS EXHAUSTED , IF THE9 |
---|
375 | 372 | | STATE DEPARTMENT IDENTIFIES A DENIAL RATE OF FORTY PERCENT OR10 |
---|
376 | 373 | | HIGHER FOR A SPECIFIC PROVIDER ON A SPECIFIC AUDIT TYPE , THE STATE11 |
---|
377 | 374 | | DEPARTMENT SHALL AUDIT NO MORE THAN AN ADDITIONAL TWENTY -FIVE12 |
---|
378 | 375 | | PERCENT OF THE CLAIM PERCENTAGES STATED IN SUBSECTION (3.3)(j)(II)13 |
---|
379 | 376 | | OF THIS SECTION ASSOCIATED WITH THAT AUDIT TYPE .14 |
---|
380 | 377 | | (IV) T |
---|
381 | 378 | | HE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBSECTION (3.3)(j) DO NOT15 |
---|
382 | 379 | | APPLY IF:16 |
---|
383 | 380 | | (A) F |
---|
384 | 381 | | EDERAL MEDICAID DIRECTIVES REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 4217 |
---|
385 | 382 | | CFR |
---|
386 | 383 | | 455, SUBPART F, REQUIRE A HIGHER LEVEL OF CLAIM AUDITS;18 |
---|
387 | 384 | | (B) A |
---|
388 | 385 | | N AGENCY OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REQUIRES , IN19 |
---|
389 | 386 | | WRITING, THE STATE DEPARTMENT TO INITIATE ADDITIONAL AUDIT20 |
---|
390 | 387 | | ACTIVITY; OR21 |
---|
391 | 388 | | (C) A |
---|
392 | 389 | | FEDERAL AUDIT IDENTIFIES ADDITIONAL PROVIDER FINDINGS22 |
---|
393 | 390 | | THAT IMPACT THE STATE GENERAL FUND AND THAT S HOULD BE23 |
---|
394 | 391 | | APPROPRIATELY RECOVERED FROM THAT PROVIDER THROUGH AN24 |
---|
395 | 392 | | ADDITIONAL RAC AUDIT AND ITS RECOUPMENTS.25 |
---|
396 | 393 | | (k) W |
---|
397 | 394 | | HEN CONDUCTING AUDITS, THE RAC VENDOR MUST:26 |
---|
398 | 395 | | (I) R |
---|
399 | 396 | | EQUEST PROVIDER RECORDS THAT ARE RELEVANT TO THE27 |
---|
400 | 397 | | 314 |
---|
401 | 398 | | -11- CLAIMS BEING AUDITED AND THAT DO NOT DUPLICATE INFORMATION1 |
---|
402 | 399 | | ALREADY PROVIDED;2 |
---|
403 | 400 | | (II) N |
---|
404 | 401 | | OT AUDIT THE VALIDITY OF A PROVIDER 'S PRIOR3 |
---|
405 | 402 | | AUTHORIZATION RECEIVED FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT ; AND4 |
---|
406 | 403 | | (III) F |
---|
407 | 404 | | OR A COMPLEX AUDIT, NOT AUDIT CLAIMS THAT ARE ON THE5 |
---|
408 | 405 | | FEDERAL CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES6 |
---|
409 | 406 | | INPATIENT-ONLY LIST AT THE DATE OF SERVICE FOR A LEVEL -OF-CARE7 |
---|
410 | 407 | | DETERMINATION.8 |
---|
411 | 408 | | |
---|
412 | 409 | | 9 |
---|
413 | 410 | | (l) (I) I |
---|
414 | 411 | | F THE RAC VENDOR IDENTIFIES PRELIMINARY FINDINGS |
---|
415 | 412 | | 10 |
---|
416 | 413 | | DURING THE RAC AUDIT, THE RAC VENDOR MUST SEND THE PROVIDER A11 |
---|
417 | 414 | | NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY AUDIT FINDINGS DETAILING THE PRELIMINARY12 |
---|
418 | 415 | | FINDINGS, THE RATIONALE FOR THE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS , AND THE13 |
---|
419 | 416 | | METHODOLOGY FOR HOW THE DOLLAR AM OUNTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE14 |
---|
420 | 417 | | PRELIMINARY FINDINGS WERE CALCULATED AND DETERMINED .15 |
---|
421 | 418 | | (II) F |
---|
422 | 419 | | OR A COMPLEX AUDIT, A PROVIDER MAY REQUEST AN EXIT |
---|
423 | 420 | | 16 |
---|
424 | 421 | | CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS THE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS WITH THE RAC17 |
---|
425 | 422 | | VENDOR AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT MEDICAL DIRECTOR , OR THE STATE18 |
---|
426 | 423 | | DEPARTMENT MEDICAL DIRECTOR 'S DESIGNEE, PRIOR TO PARTICIPATING IN19 |
---|
427 | 424 | | AN INFORMAL RECONSIDERATION . THE PROVIDER MAY PROVIDE20 |
---|
428 | 425 | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING THE PROVIDER 'S CLAIMS AT THE21 |
---|
429 | 426 | | EXIT CONFERENCE. A PROVIDER MUST REQUEST AN EXIT CONFERENCE NO22 |
---|
430 | 427 | | LATER THAN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE PROVIDER RECEIVES A NOTICE OF23 |
---|
431 | 428 | | PRELIMINARY AUDIT FINDINGS FROM THE RAC VENDOR, AND IF AN EXIT24 |
---|
432 | 429 | | CONFERENCE IS REQUESTED , THE STATE DEPARTMENT OR THE RAC25 |
---|
433 | 430 | | VENDOR MUST SCHEDULE THE EXIT CONFERENCE WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF26 |
---|
434 | 431 | | RECEIVING THE REQUEST AND ON A MUTUALLY AGREED UPON DATE AND27 |
---|
435 | 432 | | 314 |
---|
436 | 433 | | -12- TIME.1 |
---|
437 | 434 | | (III) W |
---|
438 | 435 | | ITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE EXIT CONFERENCE , THE STATE |
---|
439 | 436 | | 2 |
---|
440 | 437 | | DEPARTMENT MUST NOTIFY THE PROVIDER ON WHETHER THE STATE3 |
---|
441 | 438 | | DEPARTMENT WILL DISMISS THE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OR WILL ISSUE A4 |
---|
442 | 439 | | NOTICE OF INFORMAL RECONSIDERATION . THE NOTICE OF INFORMAL5 |
---|
443 | 440 | | RECONSIDERATION MUST INCLUDE DETAILS ON THE PRELIMINARY6 |
---|
444 | 441 | | FINDINGS, THE RATIONALE FOR THE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS , AND THE7 |
---|
445 | 442 | | METHODOLOGY FOR HOW THE DOLLAR AMOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH THE8 |
---|
446 | 443 | | PRELIMINARY FINDINGS WERE CALCULATED AND DETERMINED . IF AN EXIT9 |
---|
447 | 444 | | CONFERENCE OCCURRED , THE NOTICE MUST INCLUDE INFORMATION ON10 |
---|
448 | 445 | | WHY THE STATE DEPARTMENT DID NOT AGREE WITH THE PROVIDER 'S11 |
---|
449 | 446 | | APPROACH.12 |
---|
450 | 447 | | (IV) U |
---|
451 | 448 | | NLESS THE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE |
---|
452 | 449 | | 13 |
---|
453 | 450 | | PROVIDER, DISMISSED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING AN EXIT14 |
---|
454 | 451 | | CONFERENCE, OR THE PERIOD FOR A PROVIDER TO REQUEST AN EXIT15 |
---|
455 | 452 | | CONFERENCE HAS EXPIRED , A PROVIDER WHO RECEIVES A NOTICE OF16 |
---|
456 | 453 | | PRELIMINARY FINDINGS, THE STATE DEPARTMENT, AND THE RAC VENDOR17 |
---|
457 | 454 | | MUST PARTICIPATE IN AN INFORMAL RECONSIDERATION BEFORE THE18 |
---|
458 | 455 | | PROVIDER MAY FORMALLY APPEAL THE STATE DEPARTMENT 'S19 |
---|
459 | 456 | | DETERMINATION. TO PARTICIPATE IN AN INFORMAL CONSIDERATION , THE20 |
---|
460 | 457 | | FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SATISFIED :21 |
---|
461 | 458 | | (A) W |
---|
462 | 459 | | ITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF RECEIVING THE NOTICE OF INFORMAL |
---|
463 | 460 | | 22 |
---|
464 | 461 | | RECONSIDERATION, THE PROVIDER MUST SUBMIT ALL MEDICAL RECORDS23 |
---|
465 | 462 | | RELEVANT TO THE CLAIMS AND THE REASONING FOR THE PROVIDER 'S24 |
---|
466 | 463 | | DISAGREEMENT CONCERNING THE PRELIMINARY AUDIT FINDINGS . THE25 |
---|
467 | 464 | | MEDICAL RECORDS MUST SUBSTANTIATE THE PROVIDER 'S ARGUMENT TO26 |
---|
468 | 465 | | DISPUTE ANY PRELIMINARY FINDINGS TO ALLOW THE STATE DEPARTMENT27 |
---|
469 | 466 | | 314 |
---|
470 | 467 | | -13- AND THE RAC VENDOR TO RECONSIDER THE FINDINGS , AND THE1 |
---|
471 | 468 | | DEPARTMENT AND THE RAC VENDOR MUST REVIEW MEDICAL RECORDS2 |
---|
472 | 469 | | PRIOR TO THE INFORMAL RECONSIDERATION MEETING ;3 |
---|
473 | 470 | | (B) T |
---|
474 | 471 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST SCHEDULE AN INFORMAL |
---|
475 | 472 | | 4 |
---|
476 | 473 | | RECONSIDERATION MEETING BETWEEN MUTUALLY AGREED UPON5 |
---|
477 | 474 | | PARTICIPANTS FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT , RAC VENDOR, AND6 |
---|
478 | 475 | | PROVIDER REPRESENTATIVES AT A MUTUALLY AGREED UPON DATE AND7 |
---|
479 | 476 | | TIME WITHIN NINETY DAYS OF ISSUING THE NOTICE OF INFORMAL8 |
---|
480 | 477 | | RECONSIDERATION, ALTHOUGH EITHER PARTY MAY REQUEST A SIXTY -DAY9 |
---|
481 | 478 | | EXTENSION; AND10 |
---|
482 | 479 | | (C) A |
---|
483 | 480 | | LL AGREED UPON ATTENDEES MUST PARTICIPATE IN THE |
---|
484 | 481 | | 11 |
---|
485 | 482 | | INFORMAL RECONSIDERATION MEETING IN GOOD FAITH IN AN EFFORT TO12 |
---|
486 | 483 | | RESOLVE THE DISPUTE.13 |
---|
487 | 484 | | (V) I |
---|
488 | 485 | | F A CLAIM REMAINS IN DISPUTE AFTER THE INFORMAL |
---|
489 | 486 | | 14 |
---|
490 | 487 | | RECONSIDERATION MEETING , THE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST ISSUE A15 |
---|
491 | 488 | | NOTICE OF ADVERSE ACTION WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE INFORMAL16 |
---|
492 | 489 | | RECONSIDERATION MEETING . THE NOTICE OF ADVERSE ACTION MUST17 |
---|
493 | 490 | | INCLUDE THE BASIS OF THE ALLEGED OVERPAYMENT , THE RATIONALE FOR18 |
---|
494 | 491 | | THE ALLEGED OVERPAYMENT , THE METHODOLOGY USED TO CALCULATE19 |
---|
495 | 492 | | THE ALLEGED OVERPAYMENT , AND INFORMATION ON WHY THE STATE20 |
---|
496 | 493 | | DEPARTMENT DID NOT AGREE WITH THE PROVIDER 'S APPROACH.21 |
---|
497 | 494 | | (VI) W |
---|
498 | 495 | | ITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF RECEIVING A NOTICE OF ADVERSE |
---|
499 | 496 | | 22 |
---|
500 | 497 | | ACTION, THE PROVIDER MAY REQUEST A FORMAL APPEAL , WHICH MUST23 |
---|
501 | 498 | | INCLUDE AN EXPLANATION OF THE BASIS OF THE APPEAL IN ACCORDANCE24 |
---|
502 | 499 | | WITH RULES ADOPTED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT .25 |
---|
503 | 500 | | (VII) T |
---|
504 | 501 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST NOT RECOVER AN |
---|
505 | 502 | | 26 |
---|
506 | 503 | | OVERPAYMENT IDENTIFIED IN THE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM A27 |
---|
507 | 504 | | 314 |
---|
508 | 505 | | -14- PROVIDER UNTIL THE INFORMAL RECONSIDERATION PROCESS , AND1 |
---|
509 | 506 | | SUBSEQUENT FORMAL APPEAL , IF FILED, ARE COMPLETE.2 |
---|
510 | 507 | | (VIII) I |
---|
511 | 508 | | F THE STATE DEPARTMENT HAS NOT ISSUED A NOTICE OF |
---|
512 | 509 | | 3 |
---|
513 | 510 | | ADVERSE ACTION ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS FOLLOWING THE INFORMAL4 |
---|
514 | 511 | | RECONSIDERATION MEETING , THE STATE DEPARTMENT WAIVES ITS RIGHT5 |
---|
515 | 512 | | TO RECOVER THE STATE SHARE OF THE OVERPAYMENT .6 |
---|
516 | 513 | | (m) PROVIDERS ARE SUBJECT TO ALL STATE AND FEDERAL7 |
---|
517 | 514 | | MEDICAID FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE LAWS AND MUST COMPLY WITH ALL8 |
---|
518 | 515 | | APPLICABLE PROGRAM INTEGRITY REQUIREMENTS . FAILURE TO COMPLY9 |
---|
519 | 516 | | MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL FROM THE STATE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE10 |
---|
520 | 517 | | PROGRAM, FINANCIAL PENALTIES, CIVIL LAWSUITS, OR CRIMINAL11 |
---|
521 | 518 | | PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1320a-7k(d), 42 U.S.C. SEC.12 |
---|
522 | 519 | | 1320a-7, 31 |
---|
523 | 520 | | U.S.C. SECS. 3729-3733, SECTIONS 24-31-808, 25.5-4-301,13 |
---|
524 | 521 | | 25.5-4-303.5 |
---|
525 | 522 | | TO 25.5-4-310, AND 10 CCR 2505-10, SEC. 8.076. BY14 |
---|
526 | 523 | | PARTICIPATING IN THE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM , PROVIDERS15 |
---|
527 | 524 | | ACKNOWLEDGE AND ACCEPT THEIR OBLIGATION TO ADHERE TO ALL STATE16 |
---|
528 | 525 | | AND FEDERAL LAWS GOVERNING MEDICAID FRAUD , WASTE, AND ABUSE,17 |
---|
529 | 526 | | AND PROGRAM INTEGRITY.18 |
---|
530 | 527 | | (n) |
---|
531 | 528 | | (I) THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL PUBLISH AND MAINTAIN ON19 |
---|
532 | 529 | | ITS WEBSITE A RAC AUDIT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR EACH RAC AUDIT AND20 |
---|
533 | 530 | | REVIEW COMPLETED IN THE PRECEDING YEAR SUMMARIZING THE FINDINGS21 |
---|
534 | 531 | | OF THOSE RAC AUDITS AND REVIEWS. THE INFORMATION POSTED ON THE22 |
---|
535 | 532 | | STATE DEPARTMENT'S WEBSITE CONCERNING EACH RAC AUDIT MUST23 |
---|
536 | 533 | | INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION :24 |
---|
537 | 534 | | (A) A |
---|
538 | 535 | | SUMMARY OF THE AUDIT SCENARIO , THE STATE25 |
---|
539 | 536 | | DEPARTMENT'S BILLING PRACTICES, AND POLICY GUIDELINES BEING26 |
---|
540 | 537 | | REVIEWED BY THE RAC VENDOR;27 |
---|
541 | 538 | | 314 |
---|
542 | 539 | | -15- (B) THE ERROR RATES IDENTIFIED DURING THE RAC VENDOR'S1 |
---|
543 | 540 | | REVIEW;2 |
---|
544 | 541 | | (C) T |
---|
545 | 542 | | HE NUMBER AND AMOUNTS OF OVERPAYMENTS AND3 |
---|
546 | 543 | | UNDERPAYMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE RAC VENDOR;4 |
---|
547 | 544 | | (D) T |
---|
548 | 545 | | HE RECOVERIES COLLECTED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT ON5 |
---|
549 | 546 | | IDENTIFIED OVERPAYMENTS;6 |
---|
550 | 547 | | (E) T |
---|
551 | 548 | | HE NUMBER OF CLAIMS APPEALED AS A RESULT OF THE AUDIT ;7 |
---|
552 | 549 | | AND8 |
---|
553 | 550 | | (F) D |
---|
554 | 551 | | ETAILS ON THE AUDIT SCENARIOS AND BILLING STANDARDS9 |
---|
555 | 552 | | USED BY THE RAC VENDOR AND POLICY GUIDANCE ON PROPER BILLING10 |
---|
556 | 553 | | PRACTICES.11 |
---|
557 | 554 | | (II) I |
---|
558 | 555 | | N ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION12 |
---|
559 | 556 | | (3.3)(n)(I) |
---|
560 | 557 | | OF THIS SECTION, THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL PUBLISH AND13 |
---|
561 | 558 | | MAINTAIN ON ITS WEBSITE INFORMATION ON THE NUMBER OF INFORMAL14 |
---|
562 | 559 | | RECONSIDERATION MEETINGS THE STATE DEPARTMENT PARTICIPATED IN15 |
---|
563 | 560 | | AND THE ASSOCIATED PERCENTAGE OF FINDINGS THAT WERE UPHELD , THE16 |
---|
564 | 561 | | NUMBER OF APPEALS, AND CORRESPONDING DETERMINATIONS .17 |
---|
565 | 562 | | (o) ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2026, THE STATE DEPARTMENT18 |
---|
566 | 563 | | SHALL PUBLISH ON ITS WEBSITE PROVIDER EDUCATION INFORMATION ;19 |
---|
567 | 564 | | RESOURCES TO ASSIST PROVIDERS IN UNDERSTANDING THE STATE20 |
---|
568 | 565 | | DEPARTMENT'S MEDICAID BILLING MANUAL AND RULES; AND PROCEDURES21 |
---|
569 | 566 | | RELATED TO RAC AUDITS, INCLUDING DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS22 |
---|
570 | 567 | | AND THE PROCESS FOR RESOLVING DISPUTES .23 |
---|
571 | 568 | | (p) AT LEAST QUARTERLY, THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL :24 |
---|
572 | 569 | | (I) C |
---|
573 | 570 | | ONDUCT MEDICAID BILLING TRAINING FOR PROVIDERS AND25 |
---|
574 | 571 | | HOLD MEETINGS WITH PROVIDERS TO GATHER FEEDBACK ON THE RAC26 |
---|
575 | 572 | | AUDIT PROCESS. THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL PUBLISH MEETING DATES27 |
---|
576 | 573 | | 314 |
---|
577 | 574 | | -16- AND TIMES ON THE STATE DEPARTMENT 'S WEBSITE AT LEAST TWO WEEKS1 |
---|
578 | 575 | | PRIOR TO THE MEETINGS.2 |
---|
579 | 576 | | (II) C |
---|
580 | 577 | | ONDUCT TRAININGS FOR PROVIDERS AND HOLD3 |
---|
581 | 578 | | STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS REGARDING AUDITS AND REVIEWS , DURING4 |
---|
582 | 579 | | WHICH THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND RAC VENDOR MUST IDENTIFY5 |
---|
583 | 580 | | COMMON BILLING ERRORS IDENTIFIED BY THE RAC VENDOR IN THE6 |
---|
584 | 581 | | PREVIOUS QUARTER AND PROVIDE CLARIFICATION ON THE BILLING ERRORS .7 |
---|
585 | 582 | | (q) |
---|
586 | 583 | | THE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL WORK WITH SMALL OR RURAL8 |
---|
587 | 584 | | PROVIDERS IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY AND IMPLEMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO9 |
---|
588 | 585 | | REDUCE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS AND BETTER SUPPORT COMPLIANCE10 |
---|
589 | 586 | | WITH MEDICAID BILLING PRACTICES , AS ADOPTED IN THE STATE11 |
---|
590 | 587 | | DEPARTMENT'S MEDICAID BILLING MANUAL, AND EXPERIENCE WITH RAC12 |
---|
591 | 588 | | AUDITS.13 |
---|
592 | 589 | | (r) THE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST SUBMIT AN ANNUAL REPORT TO14 |
---|
593 | 590 | | THE JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE THAT INCLUDES A DESCRIPTION OF THE15 |
---|
594 | 591 | | FOLLOWING:16 |
---|
595 | 592 | | (I) T |
---|
596 | 593 | | HE DIVISIONS OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT THAT ARE17 |
---|
597 | 594 | | INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF RAC AUDIT SCENARIOS AND18 |
---|
598 | 595 | | THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH DIVISION;19 |
---|
599 | 596 | | (II) T |
---|
600 | 597 | | HE RAC VENDOR'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE RESPONSE20 |
---|
601 | 598 | | REQUIREMENT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (3.3)(c)(III)(C) OF THIS21 |
---|
602 | 599 | | SECTION;22 |
---|
603 | 600 | | (III) T |
---|
604 | 601 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT'S OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT OF23 |
---|
605 | 602 | | THE CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENT THAT THE RAC VENDOR CONDUCT24 |
---|
606 | 603 | | INFORMAL CONFERENCES OR PHONE CALLS WITH PROVIDERS OR PROVIDER25 |
---|
607 | 604 | | ASSOCIATIONS TO DISCUSS THE RAC PROGRAM, APPEAL PROCESSES, AND26 |
---|
608 | 605 | | FINDINGS;27 |
---|
609 | 606 | | 314 |
---|
610 | 607 | | -17- (IV) THE TRAINING MATERIALS PREPARED BY THE RAC VENDOR1 |
---|
611 | 608 | | AFTER EACH RAC AUDIT THAT IDENTIFY AND ADDRESS THE COMMON2 |
---|
612 | 609 | | ERRORS AND ISSUES IDENTIFIED DURING THE AUDIT AND THE CONTENT3 |
---|
613 | 610 | | AND MATERIALS THE RAC VENDOR USED TO EDUCATE PROVIDERS TO4 |
---|
614 | 611 | | PREVENT ERRORS IN THE FUTURE;5 |
---|
615 | 612 | | (V) A |
---|
616 | 613 | | SUMMARY OF THE RAC VENDOR'S OUTREACH AND6 |
---|
617 | 614 | | EDUCATION ACTIVITIES;7 |
---|
618 | 615 | | (VI) A |
---|
619 | 616 | | SUMMARY OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT 'S WRITTEN POLICIES,8 |
---|
620 | 617 | | PROCEDURES, AND GUIDANCE THAT ESTABLISH PROCESSES FOR THE STATE9 |
---|
621 | 618 | | DEPARTMENT TO LOG PROVIDER COMMUNICATIONS , PROVIDE DIRECTION10 |
---|
622 | 619 | | ON HOW STATE DEPARTMENT STAFF MUST RESPOND TO COMMUNICATIONS11 |
---|
623 | 620 | | IN A TIMELY AND RELEVANT MANNER , AND HOW THE STATE DEPARTMENT12 |
---|
624 | 621 | | INSTITUTED ROUTINE ANALYSIS OF PROVIDER COMMUNICATIONS TO13 |
---|
625 | 622 | | INFORM DECISIONS ON PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS ; AND14 |
---|
626 | 623 | | (VII) T |
---|
627 | 624 | | HE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALLEGED OVERPAYMENTS15 |
---|
628 | 625 | | IDENTIFIED BY THE RAC VENDOR, THE PROPORTION OF THOSE16 |
---|
629 | 626 | | OVERPAYMENTS THAT WERE RECOVERED , AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID17 |
---|
630 | 627 | | TO THE RAC VENDOR.18 |
---|
631 | 628 | | (s) |
---|
632 | 629 | | ALL RECOVERIES COLLECTED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT ON19 |
---|
633 | 630 | | IDENTIFIED OVERPAYMENTS PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (3.3) MUST BE20 |
---|
634 | 631 | | TRANSMITTED TO THE STATE TREASURER , WHO SHALL CREDIT THE SAME21 |
---|
635 | 632 | | TO THE RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTOR RECOVERIES CASH FUND , WHICH22 |
---|
636 | 633 | | FUND IS CREATED IN THE STATE TREASURY AND REFERRED TO IN THIS23 |
---|
637 | 634 | | SUBSECTION (3.3)(s) AS THE "CASH FUND". THE CASH FUND CONSISTS OF24 |
---|
638 | 635 | | MONEY CREDITED TO THE CASH FUND PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (3.3)25 |
---|
639 | 636 | | AND ANY OTHER MONEY THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MAY APPROPRIATE26 |
---|
640 | 637 | | OR TRANSFER TO THE CASH FUND. SUBJECT TO ANNUAL APPROPRIATION BY27 |
---|
641 | 638 | | 314 |
---|
642 | 639 | | -18- THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, THE STATE DEPARTMENT MAY EXPEND MONEY1 |
---|
643 | 640 | | FROM THE CASH FUND TO OFFSET THE NEED FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR2 |
---|
644 | 641 | | MEDICAL SERVICES AND TO PAY THE RAC VENDOR. THE STATE3 |
---|
645 | 642 | | TREASURER SHALL CREDIT ALL INTEREST AND INCOME DERIVED FROM THE4 |
---|
646 | 643 | | DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT OF MONEY IN THE RECOVERY AUDIT5 |
---|
647 | 644 | | CONTRACTOR RECOVERIES CASH FUND TO THE CASH FUND .6 |
---|
648 | 645 | | (t) THE STATE DEPARTMENT MAY ADOPT RULES , AS NECESSARY, TO7 |
---|
649 | 646 | | IMPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBSECTION (3.3).8 |
---|
650 | 647 | | (3.5) (c) (I) The state department shall create a provider advisory9 |
---|
651 | 648 | | group for recovery audits consisting of employees of the state department10 |
---|
652 | 649 | | and members from different provider groups TYPES, including physicians,11 |
---|
653 | 650 | | hospitals, and any other provider types directly impacted by audits12 |
---|
654 | 651 | | conducted pursuant to this section, appointed by the executive director.13 |
---|
655 | 652 | | The provider advisory group shall meet at least quarterly to review14 |
---|
656 | 653 | | quarterly activity reports required by subsection (3)(a)(IX) SUBSECTION15 |
---|
657 | 654 | | (3.3)(n) of this section and advise the state department on issues providers16 |
---|
658 | 655 | | experience with audits of the recovery audit contractors program.17 |
---|
659 | 656 | | (II) T |
---|
660 | 657 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE RAC VENDOR SHALL18 |
---|
661 | 658 | | PROVIDE THE PROVIDER ADVISORY GROUP WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO19 |
---|
662 | 659 | | REVIEW RAC AUDIT SCENARIOS DURING THE PROVIDER ADVISORY GROUP 'S20 |
---|
663 | 660 | | QUARTERLY MEETINGS.21 |
---|
664 | 661 | | (III) T |
---|
665 | 662 | | HE STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL GIVE PROVIDERS THE22 |
---|
666 | 663 | | OPPORTUNITY TO ANONYMOUSLY DESCRIBE RAC AUDIT SCENARIOS THEY23 |
---|
667 | 664 | | ARE EXPERIENCING AND ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT BILLING PRACTICES . THE24 |
---|
668 | 665 | | STATE DEPARTMENT SHALL INCLUDE RAC VENDOR STAFF AND THE25 |
---|
669 | 666 | | RELEVANT STATE DEPARTMENT DIVISION STAFF IN THESE DISCUSSIONS . IF26 |
---|
670 | 667 | | THE DISCUSSIONS LEAD THE STATE DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE THAT AN27 |
---|
671 | 668 | | 314 |
---|
672 | 669 | | -19- AUDIT SCENARIO WAS INACCURATE , THE STATE DEPARTMENT MUST WORK1 |
---|
673 | 670 | | WITH THE RAC VENDOR TO RESCIND THE RAC AUDIT.2 |
---|
674 | 671 | | SECTION 2. Appropriation adjustments to 2025 long bill.3 |
---|
675 | 672 | | (1) To implement this act, appropriations made in the annual general4 |
---|
676 | 673 | | appropriation act for the 2025-26 state fiscal year to the department of5 |
---|
677 | 674 | | health care policy and financing for medical and long-term care services6 |
---|
678 | 675 | | for medical-eligible individuals are adjusted as follows:7 |
---|
679 | 676 | | (a) The cash funds appropriation from recoveries and recoupments8 |
---|
680 | 677 | | is decreased by $20,900,588;9 |
---|
681 | 678 | | (b) The cash funds appropriation from the recovery audit10 |
---|
682 | 679 | | contractor recoveries cash fund created in section 25.5-4-301 (3.3)(s),11 |
---|
683 | 680 | | C.R.S., is increased by $20,900,588.12 |
---|
684 | 681 | | SECTION 3. Act subject to petition - effective date. This act13 |
---|
685 | 682 | | takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the14 |
---|
686 | 683 | | ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly; except15 |
---|
687 | 684 | | that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V16 |
---|
688 | 685 | | of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this17 |
---|
689 | 686 | | act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take18 |
---|
690 | 687 | | effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in19 |
---|
691 | 688 | | November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the20 |
---|
692 | 689 | | official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.21 |
---|
693 | 690 | | 314 |
---|
694 | 691 | | -20- |
---|