Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05325

Introduced
2/24/10  
Refer
2/24/10  
Report Pass
3/17/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/6/10  
Refer
4/13/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Electronic Submission Of Reports.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5325 would fundamentally alter the existing procedures for report submissions, decreasing the need for printed documents and facilitating immediate access to important state reports. It also reinforces the state’s commitment to increasing transparency, potentially leading to more informed public discourse and oversight. As the government seeks to adapt to the digital age, the bill is expected to cut costs associated with paper usage and distribution.

Summary

House Bill 5325 aims to modernize the process of reporting by mandating the electronic submission of reports from various state commissions, task forces, and agencies to enhance efficiency and transparency within the state government. The bill specifies that each commissioned group or state agency must submit its findings and recommendations electronically, which is intended to streamline access to information for legislators and the public, reducing reliance on physical copies of reports. This change aligns with broader trends towards digital communication and documentation in governmental operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 5325 appears to be generally positive among supporters, who view it as a necessary step for modernizing state operations. Advocates argue that electronic submissions not only save resources but also enhance the efficiency of legislative processes. However, some concerns may arise regarding the accessibility of digital information for all citizens, particularly those lacking technological means. The balance between embracing digitalization and ensuring equitable access to government information remains a contentious point.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include apprehensions from some members of the legislature about the potential cost and practicality of transitioning to an entirely electronic system. Critics may voice concerns that not all reports may be adequately accessible in a digital format, potentially disadvantaging certain populations. Additionally, the changes proposed by the bill may face scrutiny regarding the adequacy of security measures to protect sensitive information that could be included in reports.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.