Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00092

Introduced
2/9/10  
Refer
2/9/10  
Report Pass
2/23/10  
Refer
3/5/10  
Report Pass
3/11/10  
Refer
4/8/10  
Report Pass
4/12/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Engrossed
4/21/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning Prescription Eye Drops.

Impact

This bill alters existing statutes to ensure that coverage for prescription eye drops is not denied under certain conditions, significantly affecting state health insurance laws. By implementing these changes, the bill aims to enhance access to necessary medications and supports the principle of medical necessity as determined by healthcare providers. The anticipated effect is an improved quality of life for individuals reliant on prescription eye drops, including children who may require these medications for conditions like allergies or chronic eye conditions while at school.

Summary

SB00092, aimed at modifying health insurance provisions concerning prescription eye drops, mandates that health insurance policies provide coverage for essential renewals and an additional bottle of prescription eye drops under specific conditions. Particularly, the bill stipulates that coverage must be granted for a renewal requested within thirty days from the original prescription or the last renewal, as long as it does not exceed the quantities deemed necessary by a prescribing physician. It also allows one additional bottle for use in daycare or school settings, thereby acknowledging the needs of insured individuals who may require medications in such environments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00092 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocates for healthcare and parents of children who may need consistent access to prescription eye drops. Supporters argue that this legislation addresses a critical need in health insurance coverage, thereby fostering better health outcomes. However, there might be some concerns regarding the financial implications for insurance providers and whether such requirements could lead to increased premiums or complications in coverage approval processes.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding SB00092 may arise from the potential financial ramifications of extending coverage. Insurance companies may argue that the changes could create additional administrative burdens or increase their costs related to claims processing. Nonetheless, the underlying goal of enhancing patient care and ensuring access to necessary medication is likely to overshadow these concerns in favor of public health advocacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB149

Controlled substances: prescriptions.

TX SB594

Relating to the regulation of prescriptions for controlled substances, including certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2246

Relating to certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.