Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00197

Introduced
2/17/10  
Refer
2/17/10  
Report Pass
3/17/10  
Refer
3/23/10  
Report Pass
3/30/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning In-school Suspensions.

Impact

The legislation is expected to impact state laws significantly by changing how schools handle suspensions, thereby affecting students' educational continuity. By shifting to in-school suspensions, the bill aims to minimize disruptions to student learning and maintain supervision during disciplinary periods. Additionally, the Commissioner of Education is tasked with analyzing the financial implications for local school districts to gauge the potential increase in costs associated with implementing this change. This analysis will consider how the bill may affect various districts differently based on their size.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 197 aims to mandate that all school suspensions within the state are conducted as in-school suspensions, effective from July 1, 2011. The bill's primary intent is to keep students in the educational environment rather than excluding them during suspensions, which supporters argue fosters a more constructive disciplinary approach. Under the proposed law, in-school suspensions can be served either within the student's own school or in any school under the jurisdiction of their local or regional board of education, depending on the discretion of school authorities.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB00197 appears to be cautiously optimistic among educators who believe in the benefits of keeping students engaged in their learning environments during disciplinary actions. Advocates emphasize that this approach can lead to better educational outcomes and reduces the likelihood of students falling behind. Conversely, there may be concerns regarding the initial operational adjustments required for schools to accommodate this shift, including resource allocation and staff training.

Contention

A notable point of contention lies in the analysis that the Commissioner of Education will conduct regarding potential cost increases for school districts. While proponents argue that the long-term educational benefits justify the costs, opponents may contend that smaller districts, in particular, could face financial strain from the necessity of maintaining in-school suspension programs. There may also be broader discussions on how schools can effectively implement these changes while still catering to the diverse needs of their student populations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.