Connecticut Senate Bill SB00283

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/10
• Refer: 2/24/10
• Report Pass: 3/23/10
• Refer: 3/31/10
• Report Pass: 4/7/10
• Refer: 4/14/10
• Report Pass: 4/20/10
• Report Pass: 4/21/10
• Engrossed: 5/3/10
• Report Pass: 5/4/10
• Chaptered: 5/18/10
• Enrolled: 5/24/10
• Passed: 6/7/10

Caption

An Act Concerning Audits By The Department Of Social Services.

Impact

This bill significantly impacts state laws concerning accountability and oversight in social service programs. By formalizing the auditing process and ensuring that auditors adhere to specific protocols, the bill seeks to enhance transparency and reduce the likelihood of arbitrary or unreasoned auditing. Moreover, the bill allows for a structured appeals process for providers who might disagree with findings, thus aiming to protect their rights and adding a layer of fairness to the auditing framework.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 283, also known as An Act Concerning Audits by the Department of Social Services, aims to amend regulations surrounding the auditing process for service providers within the social services sector. The legislation establishes clear guidelines for the auditing of providers that receive funding or participation from the Department of Social Services. Notably, it specifies notification requirements prior to audits, outlining that providers must be informed at least 30 days in advance, barring circumstances posing a risk to health or safety, or instances of suspected fraud.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 283 appears to be largely positive among legislators focused on improving efficiency and accountability within social service programs. Proponents argue that these changes are essential for maintaining program integrity and protecting taxpayer interests. However, there may also be concerns about the implications for providers who may face increased scrutiny, potentially leading to fears about the operational workload and compliance costs.

Contention

Despite the general support for increased oversight in social services, points of contention arise regarding the balance between rigorous auditing and the operational realities faced by service providers. Critics may argue that while oversight is necessary to prevent fraud and ensure service quality, overly stringent audit requirements could inadvertently hinder the delivery of services by imposing excessive burdens on providers. Additionally, discussions around the appropriateness of the measures outlined in the bill will likely continue as stakeholders consider the impacts of heightened regulations.