Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00427

Introduced
3/5/10  
Refer
3/5/10  
Report Pass
3/16/10  
Refer
3/25/10  
Report Pass
3/31/10  
Refer
4/8/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Report Pass
4/14/10  
Refer
4/16/10  
Report Pass
4/20/10  
Report Pass
4/21/10  
Refer
4/27/10  
Report Pass
4/29/10  
Report Pass
4/29/10  
Engrossed
5/3/10  
Report Pass
5/4/10  
Chaptered
5/18/10  
Enrolled
5/24/10  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Hand-held Mobile Telephones And Mobile Electronic Devices By Motor Vehicle Operators.

Impact

Upon its enactment, SB00427 will amend existing traffic laws, particularly by repealing and replacing the previous statutes governing the use of mobile devices while driving. This legislation specifically outlines the conditions under which mobile device usage is prohibited and establishes clear penalties for violations. One significant impact is on young drivers, as the bill sets stringent rules against mobile device use for drivers under the age of 18. This could lead to a general decrease in distracted driving incidents among this demographic, hence promoting road safety and public welfare.

Summary

SB00427 aims to legislate the use of hand-held mobile telephones and mobile electronic devices by motor vehicle operators to enhance road safety. The bill prohibits the use of hand-held devices for making calls while driving and establishes specific guidelines for using such devices. It emphasizes the potential hazards of distracted driving, particularly the risk posed by texting and using mobile devices while the vehicle is in motion. By enforcing stricter regulations, the bill seeks to reduce vehicle accidents attributed to distracted driving behaviors and to encourage safer driving practices amongst all drivers, notably those under 18 years of age.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00427 appears to be largely positive, with widespread support from safety advocates and law enforcement officials who acknowledge the pressing need to address distracted driving. However, some concerns were raised regarding the implications of strict regulations on personal freedoms and potential enforcement challenges. Overall, proponents underscore the necessity of this legislative measure to protect lives and reduce traffic-related fatalities linked to distracted driving.

Contention

Despite the apparent benefits, there are points of contention regarding SB00427. Opponents argue that laws regulating device usage may be difficult to enforce uniformly and could lead to racial profiling during traffic stops. Additionally, some individuals express concerns about the effectiveness of the bill in actually reducing traffic incidents if comprehensive driver education programs are not simultaneously implemented. Such discussions highlight the ongoing debate about balancing road safety with individual rights and law enforcement practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA SB1339

Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act; telephone solicitations by text message, effective date.

CA AB1231

Telecommunications: combining lifeline, federal lifeline, and federal Affordable Connectivity Program subsidies.

NC H936

Robocall Solicitation Modifications

CA SB716

Lifeline program: broadband internet access service.

CA AB1588

Telecommunications: duties of local exchange carriers.

CA AB2808

Primary ticket sellers.

CA AB2885

False campaign speech and online platform disclosures.

CA SB1272

Crimes: intercepting telephone communications.