Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05482

Introduced
1/19/11  
Introduced
1/19/11  
Refer
1/19/11  
Refer
1/19/11  
Refer
3/22/11  
Refer
3/22/11  
Report Pass
3/23/11  
Report Pass
3/23/11  
Refer
4/1/11  
Refer
4/1/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Report Pass
4/7/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/11/11  
Report Pass
5/11/11  
Engrossed
5/18/11  
Engrossed
5/18/11  
Report Pass
5/20/11  
Report Pass
5/20/11  
Chaptered
6/20/11  
Chaptered
6/20/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Vetoed
7/8/11  

Caption

An Act Reconstituting The Connecticut Capitol Center Commission.

Impact

This bill aims to ensure that the Capitol Center develops in a systematic manner, establishing a master plan that includes essential elements such as land use, infrastructure, utility services, and public amenities. The strategic focus on reconstituting the commission also seeks to attract diverse inputs from local stakeholders, fostering a collaborative approach toward urban redevelopment. By emphasizing a master plan with periodic reviews and recommended changes, the bill is positioned to create a more organized development process that benefits both the state and the city of Hartford.

Summary

House Bill No. 5482, titled 'An Act Reconstituting The Connecticut Capitol Center Commission,' focuses on revising the structure and functions of the Connecticut Capitol Center Commission, which is responsible for overseeing the development of the Capitol Center in Hartford. The bill seeks to update the composition of the commission by altering the representatives from various state and local authorities, thereby enhancing the governance related to the Capitol Center district's development.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB05482 appears largely supportive, especially from local government officials who recognize the need for a structured plan to guide development in the Capitol Center district. Proponents argue that by clarifying and updating the commission's structure, the bill can lead to improved coordination among various parties involved, thus resulting in better decision-making and progress in urban development projects. However, concerns might stem from how effectively the commission will balance state goals with local community needs.

Contention

While the bill received unanimous support in voting sessions, a potential point of contention could revolve around the adequacy of community representation within the reconstituted commission. Ensuring that the interests of Hartford residents and local businesses are adequately represented remains a critical consideration, especially when urban development can lead to significant changes in neighborhoods. The evolving composition of the commission could also lead to debates regarding the priorities set forth in the master plan, ensuring they align with the long-term goals of the community.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

KY SR249

A RESOLUTION adjourning the Senate in honor and loving memory of William Hartford Ellison.

CT SB00407

An Act Concerning The New Britain To Hartford Busway.

CT SB00526

An Act Authorizing Bonds Of The State To Assist In The Implementation Of The Hartford School District Consolidation Plan.

CT SB01043

An Act Concerning The Hartford Courant.

CT HB05347

An Act Consolidating The New Hartford Volunteer Fire District And The Pine Meadow Fire District.

CT SB00452

An Act Concerning The Admissions Tax On Events At Dunkin' Donuts Park In Hartford.

CT SB00510

An Act Concerning The New Hartford Volunteer Fire Department And The Pine Meadow Fire Department.

CT SB00111

An Act Concerning Home Energy Assistance.