Connecticut House Bill HB06054

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/11
• Refer: 1/25/11
• Report Pass: 3/15/11
• Report Pass: 3/25/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The Tracking Of Unique Identifiers By Institutions Of Higher Education.

Impact

The implementation of HB 06054 is expected to have significant implications for state educational policies. By requiring institutions to record and track these unique state-assigned identifiers, the bill will contribute to a more robust data collection effort regarding student performance. This uniform approach aims to facilitate easier access to information for policymakers and educators, fostering improvements in educational strategies at both institutional and state levels. However, this may also necessitate adjustments in administrative practices at colleges and universities across the state to align with new requirements.

Summary

House Bill 06054 aims to enhance the tracking of students in the state’s higher education system by mandating public and independent higher education institutions that receive state funding to utilize unique identifiers assigned to students. This initiative is positioned as a means to better monitor student progress from the point of enrollment through to graduation or any termination of enrollment. The legislation intends to establish a more cohesive and effective academic tracking system that can yield valuable data on educational outcomes and trends.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06054 appears to be generally supportive among educational leaders who recognize the benefits of improved tracking capabilities for student performance. This sentiment is coupled with concerns from some stakeholders regarding privacy and the logistics of implementing such a system. There are advocates for both sides: those emphasizing the importance of data-driven decision-making in education and those cautioning about potential overreach in student monitoring and record-keeping.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between enhancing educational data for accountability and maintaining student privacy. Some critics argue that increased tracking could lead to over-surveillance of students, while proponents of the bill explain that the tracking of unique identifiers is crucial for fostering transparency and improving educational outcomes. The debate hinges on how to effectively implement this tracking without infringing on student rights or confidentiality.