Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06126

Introduced
1/25/11  
Introduced
1/25/11  
Refer
1/25/11  
Refer
1/25/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Report Pass
3/18/11  
Report Pass
3/18/11  
Refer
3/31/11  
Refer
3/31/11  
Report Pass
4/6/11  
Report Pass
4/6/11  
Engrossed
4/27/11  
Engrossed
4/27/11  
Report Pass
4/29/11  
Report Pass
4/29/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Chaptered
6/21/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Enrolled
6/24/11  
Passed
7/8/11  

Caption

An Act Authorizing Bicyclists To Cross The Housatonic Railroad At Grade In New Milford.

Impact

The implications of HB 6126 are significant for state laws related to transportation and local governance. By allowing bicycles to cross at this specific railway crossing, the bill empowers New Milford’s legislative body to manage local transportation frameworks more effectively. However, this authorization comes with conditions, including the exclusion of motorized vehicles and the installation of safety crossbucks, which the town must fund and maintain. This decision marks a step towards accommodating alternative modes of transportation while ensuring safety protocols are in place.

Summary

House Bill 6126, also referred to as the Act Authorizing Bicyclists To Cross The Housatonic Railroad At Grade In New Milford, is a legislative measure designed to enhance bicycle accessibility in the town of New Milford. The bill permits cyclists to cross a section of the Housatonic Railroad via a dedicated bicycle path at a specified location, Sega Meadows Park, ensuring safe transit for cyclists. This act aims to facilitate non-motorized transport and promote cycling as a viable commute option within the locality.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding the bill reveal a generally positive sentiment toward enhancing cyclist infrastructure in New Milford. Supporters view this legislation as a progressive approach to improve transportation options and promote greener commuting alternatives. The implementation of such measures resonates positively within cycling communities and advocates for greater accessibility of non-motorized transport. On the other hand, there are concerns regarding the responsibility of the town to finance and maintain the crossing, which may lead to debates over budget allocations and priorities.

Contention

While the bill seems well-received overall, some points of contention have emerged. The requirement for the town to bear the costs of construction and maintenance may pose challenges, particularly in budgeting for such improvements while ensuring other community needs are met. Additionally, ensuring that the crossing is safe for cyclists and complies with existing legal statutes adds another layer of complexity. Thus, while the overall intent is beneficial, the political viability and financial implications may spur further discussions and considerations among local legislators.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.