Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06231

Introduced
1/27/11  
Introduced
1/27/11  
Refer
1/27/11  
Report Pass
3/15/11  
Refer
3/23/11  
Refer
3/23/11  
Report Pass
3/29/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Development Of A General Education Core Of Courses To Allow For The Seamless Transfer From The Regional Community-technical College System To The Connecticut State University System And The University Of Connecticut.

Impact

The enactment of HB 06231 is anticipated to significantly impact the higher education landscape in Connecticut. By establishing a unified general education curriculum across different educational systems, the bill seeks to streamline the transition process for students transferring from community colleges to universities. This could potentially lead to increased student retention and graduation rates, as well as encourage more students to pursue higher education with the assurance that their credits will transfer seamlessly.

Summary

House Bill 06231 focuses on the development of a standardized general education core curriculum intended to facilitate the seamless transfer of students between the regional community-technical college system, the Connecticut State University System, and the University of Connecticut. The bill mandates that thirty academic credits from designated transfer programs be easily transferable towards the general education core requirements of these higher education institutions. This initiative aims at improving student mobility and reducing the barriers currently encountered during credit transfers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 06231 appears to be supportive, particularly among educational institutions, as it aligns with broader educational goals of accessibility and inclusivity. Administrators and educators may perceive this as a progressive step towards modernizing the education system in Connecticut. However, there may be concerns related to the implementation of this initiative, particularly regarding how institutions would ensure compliance and the management of the new curriculum standards.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as beneficial, there could be points of contention about the specifics of the curriculum design and the potential loss of unique program identities at community colleges. Critics might argue that a standardized core could dilute specialized programs that offer distinct educational experiences. Additionally, ensuring that all institutions can deliver the proposed curriculum effectively may pose challenges, leading to discussions around funding and resource allocation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.