Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06273

Introduced
2/1/11  
Introduced
2/1/11  
Refer
2/1/11  
Refer
2/1/11  
Report Pass
3/7/11  
Report Pass
3/7/11  
Refer
3/14/11  
Refer
3/14/11  
Report Pass
3/21/11  
Report Pass
3/21/11  
Refer
4/26/11  
Refer
4/26/11  
Report Pass
4/28/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Office Of State Ethics.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws is significant as it proposes to amend various sections of the general statutes related to the governance of the Office of State Ethics. One of the key changes includes the assurance that the board's composition will not contain more than five members from the same political party, fostering a more bipartisan approach to ethical oversight. The bill will also empower the office to take more assertive actions against violations of ethics laws, potentially changing how public officials and state employees approach their conduct in office.

Summary

House Bill 06273, titled 'An Act Concerning The Office Of State Ethics', aims to establish and enhance the functions of the Office of State Ethics by providing it with better-defined powers and responsibilities. It seeks to bolster government accountability by modifying the structure and appointment process of the Citizen's Ethics Advisory Board, a pivotal part of the ethics oversight framework in the state. This reorganization is intended to streamline ethical governance and promote adherence to ethical standards within state agencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 06273 appears to be largely positive among those advocating for improved ethics in government. Supporters believe that the enhancements to the Office of State Ethics will lead to greater accountability, transparency, and public trust in government operations. However, there may be concerns from those who fear that increased oversight could overly restrict the actions of public officials or create bureaucratic hurdles.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 06273 may revolve around the objectives of governance versus the autonomy of public officials. Critics might argue that while enhancing ethical standards is important, it could inadvertently stifle political engagement and decision-making by implementing stringent regulations. The balance between ethical oversight and operational flexibility will likely be a topic of debate as stakeholders consider the implications of this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.