An Act Confirming And Adopting Volumes 1 To 13, Inclusive, Of The General Statutes, Revised To 2011.
The enactment of this bill will have a significant impact on the legal landscape of Connecticut by formally integrating revisions made to state statutes over multiple decades. This codification is critical for ensuring that the legal framework remains relevant and comprehensible, as it codifies the changes made by various legislative acts into an organized structure. This helps eliminate ambiguities and discrepancies in the law that could arise from having outdated or inconsistently revised statutes. As such, it reinforces the integrity and functionality of state law as it adapts to changing societal needs and legal interpretations.
House Bill 6275 is an act that confirms and adopts Volumes 1 to 13 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, revised to 2011. This legislative measure consolidates, codifies, arranges, and revises the state's laws and statutes dating back to 1958. The bill seeks to ensure that the statutes reflect the most current legal framework, aligning various public acts from 1959 to 2010. By enacting this legislation, the Connecticut General Assembly aims to maintain an updated and coherent legal code that is accessible for legislative reference and public understanding.
The sentiment surrounding HB 6275 appears to be largely positive among legislators, as the passage demonstrates a commitment to maintaining a transparent and accessible legal system. The fact that the bill received a unanimous vote with no opposition indicates broad legislative support for the initiative. Such consensus is often attributed to the perceived necessity of keeping statutes pertinent and effective, representing an understanding of the importance of legal clarity and consistency in governance.
While there may not have been notable contention during the discussions or voting process related to HB 6275, the act embodies ongoing discussions regarding the importance of maintaining updated and precise statutory codes. Challenges might arise in future revisions regarding differing opinions on what needs to be included or amended. However, the act serves as a significant step towards ensuring that the overall communication of laws in Connecticut remains consistent and effective, minimizing the potential for legal challenges that stem from misinterpretation or ambiguity.