Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06295

Introduced
2/4/11  
Introduced
2/4/11  
Refer
2/4/11  
Refer
2/4/11  
Report Pass
3/15/11  
Report Pass
3/15/11  
Refer
3/25/11  
Refer
3/25/11  
Report Pass
3/31/11  
Refer
4/6/11  
Refer
4/6/11  
Report Pass
4/12/11  
Report Pass
4/12/11  
Refer
4/21/11  
Refer
4/21/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Engrossed
5/12/11  
Report Pass
5/16/11  
Chaptered
6/30/11  
Enrolled
7/1/11  
Enrolled
7/1/11  
Passed
7/13/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Police Officers Who Accept Employment With Another Police Department And Municipal Employees' Eligibility For Disability Retirement.

Impact

The bill significantly amends the eligibility criteria for municipal employees seeking disability retirement. It redefines the process, enabling an eligible member who has served a minimum of ten years and becomes permanently disabled from gainful employment to qualify for retirement benefits. Such provisions ensure that those who become disabled in the line of duty can receive ongoing financial support without ambiguity surrounding their eligibility. The adjustments aim to align the retirement process with the expectations of modern police service and the well-being of municipal workers.

Summary

House Bill 6295, referred to as An Act Concerning Police Officers Who Accept Employment With Another Police Department And Municipal Employees' Eligibility For Disability Retirement, aims to adjust the existing framework governing police employment and benefits in Connecticut. The bill introduces provisions that allow police officers certified in accordance with state regulations to accept positions with another police department without the need to repeat basic training. This change is designed to facilitate the transfer of skilled personnel between police departments, enhancing workforce flexibility within law enforcement agencies across the state.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB 6295 appear to show overall support, particularly among law enforcement groups who advocate for the flexibility it would provide in retaining qualified officers. The sentiment is predominantly positive among those advocating for police personnel rights and benefits, with an emphasis on improving employment conditions and employee welfare. However, there may be concerns regarding the cost implications of increased disability retirement claims, which could draw challenges from budget-conscious legislators.

Contention

Some points of contention revolve around the changes in the disability retirement provisions. While proponents emphasize that the new guidelines will offer essential support for injured workers, opponents might argue about the potential for increased financial burdens on municipal budgets. Furthermore, while the ability for officers to transfer without additional training is seen positively, there could be discussion regarding the adequacy of training standards for those moving between departments, ensuring public safety is maintained and that all officers continue to meet certification requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.