Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06306

Introduced
2/8/11  
Refer
2/8/11  
Report Pass
3/1/11  
Report Pass
3/1/11  
Refer
3/11/11  
Refer
3/11/11  
Report Pass
3/17/11  
Report Pass
3/17/11  
Refer
3/22/11  
Refer
3/22/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  
Engrossed
4/27/11  
Engrossed
4/27/11  
Report Pass
4/29/11  
Report Pass
4/29/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Passed
7/13/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Listing Of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses In Managed Care Organization Provider Listings, And Primary Care Provider Designations.

Impact

The enactment of HB 6306 is poised to have a significant impact on state laws regarding healthcare provider designations. By formally integrating APRNs into the health care provider listings and allowing them to serve as primary care providers, the law aims to improve access to healthcare services, particularly in underserved areas. This change is particularly important in expanding healthcare access amidst a growing shortage of primary care physicians, as APRNs can fulfill many of the same roles traditionally held by physicians.

Summary

House Bill 6306, also known as Public Act No. 11-199, addresses the recognition of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) within managed care organizations. The bill mandates that all managed care plans in Connecticut include APRNs in their provider listings, ensuring that enrollees can clearly identify these professionals among their available healthcare providers. Furthermore, it allows enrollees the option to select either a physician or an APRN as their primary care provider, thereby enhancing the role of APRNs in delivering primary care services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6306 appears to be largely positive among healthcare advocacy groups and APRN professionals, who view the bill as a progressive step towards more inclusive and comprehensive healthcare delivery. Supporters argue that it not only validates the role of APRNs but also meets the growing demand for primary care services. However, some skepticism exists among traditional medical associations, which may have concerns about changes to established healthcare provider structures and the implications for physician-led care.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential opposition from physician groups who may be concerned that the expanded role of APRNs could lead to a dilution of patient care standards. There may also be debates around the necessary training and oversight required to ensure that APRNs are adequately prepared to take on these roles as primary care providers. The bill's proponents argue that numerous studies support the efficacy of APRNs in delivering high-quality care, but opponents may point to the lack of uniformity in APRN training and practice across states.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.