Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06313

Introduced
2/8/11  
Refer
2/8/11  
Report Pass
3/11/11  
Report Pass
3/11/11  
Refer
3/23/11  
Refer
3/23/11  
Report Pass
3/29/11  
Report Pass
3/29/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Refer
5/4/11  
Report Pass
5/9/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Intensive Probation Supervision.

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly impact the state's probation system by fostering a more structured and supervised environment for individuals on probation. By doing so, it aims to reduce recidivism rates and facilitate better reintegration into the community. The requirement for probation officers to create community release plans also highlights a shift towards focusing on rehabilitation rather than solely punishment, reflecting a growing trend in criminal justice reform.

Summary

House Bill 6313, titled 'An Act Concerning Intensive Probation Supervision,' aims to enhance the supervision of individuals on probation through the implementation of intensive pretrial supervision services. The bill mandates that probation officers provide these services as per court orders and develop alternative sentencing plans for those who enter plea agreements involving sentences of two years or less. This legislative initiative is part of a broader effort to address issues within the criminal justice system and improve outcomes for offenders.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6313 appears to be largely positive among proponents who view the bill as a necessary step towards more effective probation management. Stakeholders believe that the enhanced supervision and alternative sentencing options will lead to better outcomes for offenders and the community at large. However, some concerns may arise regarding the implementation of these changes and the capacity of the probation system to adapt to these new requirements, signaling a need for adequate resources and training for probation officers.

Contention

While the bill holds promise for improving supervision methods, it may also spark debates regarding the fairness and efficacy of intensive probation supervision. Critics may express concerns over the potential for over-policing individuals on probation and the adequacy of resources for probation officers to manage these increased responsibilities. Additionally, the balance between public safety and offender rehabilitation may be scrutinized as the bill seeks to introduce more stringent supervision measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.