Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06343

Introduced
2/14/11  
Introduced
2/14/11  
Refer
2/14/11  
Refer
2/14/11  
Report Pass
4/12/11  
Report Pass
4/12/11  
Refer
4/20/11  
Refer
4/20/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Report Pass
4/27/11  
Refer
5/10/11  
Report Pass
5/16/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Cooperative Health Care Arrangements.

Impact

The legislation is expected to amend existing laws by introducing a structured process for healthcare providers to collaborate under specific conditions and oversight. Providers seeking to form cooperative arrangements must apply for a certificate, which requires a thorough review of the proposed benefits and implications for competition within the healthcare sector. The Attorney General's ability to supervise these arrangements and require annual progress reports establishes a framework for accountability and ongoing assessment of the cooperative initiatives' effectiveness.

Summary

House Bill 6343, referred to as the Act Concerning Cooperative Health Care Arrangements, aims to facilitate cooperation among healthcare providers while ensuring that such arrangements do not significantly lessen competition in the healthcare market. The bill allows two or more health care providers to enter into cooperative arrangements, particularly for patient sharing, referring personnel, negotiating rates with managed care organizations, among others. The Attorney General plays a critical role by issuing a certificate of public advantage that permits the cooperative arrangement provided its benefits outweigh potential disadvantages.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 6343 appears cautiously optimistic, primarily among healthcare providers looking to streamline operations and potentially improve service delivery through collaboration. Advocates for the bill argue that it encourages innovation and efficiency within the healthcare system while maintaining regulatory oversight. However, there are also concerns that such arrangements could lead to monopolistic practices if not adequately regulated, indicating a level of apprehension among consumer advocates and some legislators regarding the balance between cooperation and competition in healthcare.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential impact on competition and healthcare quality. While the intent is to foster cooperation among providers to enhance service efficiency, critics express concerns about the dangers of reduced competition leading to higher prices and decreased service quality for consumers. The bill necessitates careful consideration to ensure that while healthcare providers are allowed to cooperate for efficiency, they do not undermine consumer protections or create barriers to access due to unchecked market power.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3301

Relating to merger agreements among certain hospitals; authorizing fees.

TX SB1529

Relating to merger agreements among certain hospitals; imposing fees.

CT HB06431

An Act Concerning Cooperative Health Care Arrangements.

CT SB00182

An Act Concerning Cooperative Health Care Arrangements.

CT SB00480

An Act Concerning Cooperative Health Care Arrangements.

IN SB0119

Certificate of public advantage.

LA SCR98

Requests the law enforcement agencies of Louisiana to take advantage of the Attorney General's Drug Take Back Box program to receive free receptacles for the safe disposal of opioids.

IN SB0298

Certificates of public advantage.