Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06349

Introduced
2/16/11  
Refer
2/16/11  
Report Pass
3/1/11  
Report Pass
3/1/11  
Report Pass
3/8/11  
Report Pass
3/8/11  
Refer
3/14/11  
Refer
3/14/11  
Report Pass
3/21/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Synchronizing Prescription Refills.

Impact

Once enacted, this legislation will amend existing health insurance regulations in Connecticut, specifically relating to prescription drug coverage under individual and group health insurance policies. It disallows insurance providers from denying coverage for synchronized refills, thereby supporting patients in managing their medications more effectively. The law aims to alleviate the logistical burden on patients who often struggle with coordinating multiple prescriptions, thereby fostering a more patient-centered approach in chronic illness management.

Summary

House Bill 6349, titled 'An Act Concerning Synchronizing Prescription Refills', aims to improve the management of prescription medications for individuals suffering from chronic illnesses. The primary focus of this legislation is to require health insurance policies to offer coverage for the synchronized refilling of multiple prescriptions, provided that a plan is established with the involvement of the insured, their practitioner, and a pharmacist. This approach is anticipated to enhance patient adherence to medication regimens by simplifying the refill process, potentially leading to better health outcomes.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards HB 6349 has been supportive, as many stakeholders, including healthcare providers and patient advocacy groups, recognize the benefits of simplifying prescription management for patients with chronic conditions. There is a general consensus among supporters that this bill addresses an important gap in the healthcare system by promoting adherence to prescribed treatments, which ultimately supports better health outcomes and can reduce long-term healthcare costs.

Contention

While the bill has garnered significant support, some concerns have been raised regarding the practicality and implications of implementation. Critics have expressed worries about whether all insurers will comply fully with the synchronization requirement and about potential administrative burdens on pharmacies and practitioners. Additionally, the bill's requirement for coordinated care may raise questions about how it will be enforced and whether it could lead to delays in medication access if not managed properly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.