Connecticut House Bill HB06397

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Report Pass: 3/8/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The Development Of An Energy Independent Economy In Connecticut.

Impact

The implementation of this bill is expected to trigger significant changes in state laws pertaining to transportation and energy use. Specifically, it introduces alternative fuel requirements for state-owned heavy vehicles, which could lead to a broader initiative to promote cleaner energy across various sectors. This could potentially inspire similar legislation at the local or federal level, as other states might look to Connecticut's example in transitioning away from more polluting fuels.

Summary

HB06397, titled 'An Act Concerning the Development of an Energy Independent Economy in Connecticut', aims to improve the state's approach to energy use and reduce reliance on traditional fossil fuels. The bill mandates that by January 1, 2015, at least twenty-five percent of the state's heavy fleet, which includes tri-axle and diesel-powered vehicles, be converted to use liquefied natural gas and compressed gas fuel. This shift is positioned as a necessary action to advance Connecticut's energy independence and sustainability goals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB06397 appears to be generally positive, especially among stakeholders focused on environmental standards and energy innovation. Advocates argue that transitioning to natural gas will not only align with environmental goals but will also support job creation in emerging energy sectors. However, there may be concerns voiced by some parties about the practicality and costs associated with such a significant fleet transition, indicating a degree of caution among certain legislators and industry representatives.

Contention

Despite its supportive base, HB06397 also faces points of contention, particularly regarding the logistics of implementation and short-term costs involved in converting existing vehicles. Critics may raise questions about the adequacy of infrastructure for natural gas and the impact on existing budgets. Furthermore, the bill opens discussions around the state’s commitment to long-term environmental goals versus immediate economic considerations.