Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06410

Introduced
2/17/11  
Introduced
2/17/11  
Refer
2/17/11  
Refer
2/17/11  
Report Pass
3/11/11  
Report Pass
3/11/11  
Refer
3/21/11  
Refer
3/21/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  
Report Pass
3/28/11  
Engrossed
5/26/11  
Engrossed
5/26/11  
Report Pass
5/31/11  
Report Pass
5/31/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Vetoed
7/13/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Revision Of Municipal Charters.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6410 will significantly impact state laws governing municipal charters and the authority of local commissions. The bill's provisions mean that commissions will be able to make suggestions for charter changes more freely, reflecting a shift towards a more responsive local governance system. This revised approach is expected to facilitate a more participatory process, allowing residents to have a greater say in how their local government operates and adapts to new challenges.

Summary

House Bill 6410, titled 'An Act Concerning The Revision Of Municipal Charters', aims to update and streamline the process of municipal charter revisions in the state. The bill introduces modifications to the authority of commissions that are appointed to revise charters, enabling them to consider a wider range of recommendations, including those beyond existing guidelines. This is intended to enhance the flexibility and adaptability of local governance in response to evolving community needs and circumstances.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely positive, as it is viewed as a means to empower local communities and enhance democratic participation. Proponents believe that the bill will enable municipalities to better respond to contemporary issues and engage residents in governance. However, there may be concerns about the implications of broadening the scope of considerations for charter revisions, especially regarding the uniformity of governance practices across different municipalities.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 6410 may arise from differing opinions on the extent of authority that local commissions should have in revising charters. While some advocates argue for increased flexibility to address specific community needs, others may fear that this could lead to inconsistencies in governance practices and potential conflicts with broader state regulations. The challenge will be to balance local autonomy with the need for cohesive state governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.