Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06527

Introduced
3/3/11  
Introduced
3/3/11  
Refer
3/3/11  
Refer
3/3/11  
Report Pass
3/22/11  
Report Pass
3/22/11  
Refer
3/31/11  
Refer
3/31/11  
Report Pass
4/6/11  
Report Pass
4/6/11  
Refer
4/12/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Tax Incremental Financing In Enterprise Corridor Zones, Tax Incremental Financing In Municipal Development Zones, And Allowing Certain Commercial Properties In Bristol And Plainville To Qualify For Enterprise Zone Benefits.

Impact

If implemented, HB06527 is expected to facilitate increased investment in targeted municipalities by amending existing laws to create a more favorable environment for economic development projects. The Connecticut Development Authority will be empowered to issue bonds supported by the incremental tax revenues, which can provide financing for construction, renovations, and improvements on eligible commercial properties. Moreover, the establishment of tax incentive programs is anticipated to encourage businesses to establish or expand operations in these designated areas, thereby potentially expanding the local tax base.

Summary

House Bill 06527 proposes changes regarding tax incremental financing (TIF) specifically in enterprise corridor zones and municipal development zones. It includes provisions allowing certain commercial properties in specific municipalities, namely Bristol and Plainville, to qualify for enterprise zone benefits. The bill is structured to bolster the financial framework for supporting economic development projects through TIF mechanisms, enabling the issuance of bonds secured against incremental tax revenues generated by qualifying projects. This approach aims to stimulate significant economic growth and development in designated areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB06527 appears to be largely positive among proponents who view it as a necessary tool for rejuvenating underdeveloped urban and suburban regions by attracting new business ventures. Supporters argue that the bill aligns with broader economic development strategies, while opponents may express concerns about the long-term fiscal implications of extending TIF incentives without addressing potential negative impacts, such as reduced tax revenues for local governments over time.

Contention

One significant point of contention is the potential for HB06527 to prioritize certain areas for development at the expense of others, which could lead to disparities in growth opportunities. Additionally, concerns may arise regarding the effectiveness of TIF arrangements in truly benefiting local economies versus merely funneling public funds into private ventures. Questions about the accountability of the Connecticut Development Authority in managing these financial instruments also persist, particularly in light of the fiscal projections and viability assessments required for each project.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06221

An Act Concerning The Elimination Of Certain Sunset Dates.

CT HB05500

An Act Concerning An Adjustment To Certain Dates Relating To The Financing Of Steel Point In Bridgeport.

CT SB01114

An Act Concerning The Governing Board Of The Harbor Point District And An Expansion Of Tax Incremental Financing.

CT SB00110

An Act Eliminating The Sunset For Certain Tax Incremental Financing Programs.

CA AB2488

Downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

WV HB2984

To revise the West Virginia Tax Increment Financing Act to authorize a county commission or municipal levying body to modify the termination times of certain districts

CA AB1445

Downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts.

WV HB4692

To revise the West Virginia Tax Increment Financing Act