Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06557

Introduced
3/7/11  
Introduced
3/7/11  
Refer
3/7/11  
Refer
3/7/11  
Report Pass
4/15/11  
Report Pass
4/15/11  
Refer
4/26/11  
Refer
4/26/11  
Report Pass
5/3/11  
Report Pass
5/3/11  
Engrossed
5/17/11  
Report Pass
5/19/11  
Chaptered
6/28/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Enrolled
6/30/11  
Passed
7/13/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Liability For The Recreational Use Of Lands.

Impact

The bill is significant as it alters existing liability statutes, aiming to bolster public access to recreational areas while safeguarding landowners. With its enactment, landowners are provided with a legal shield, thus promoting recreational activities such as hiking, fishing, and camping on privately owned land. This measure is expected to enhance social benefits by increasing outdoor participation among the public and potentially improving community health and well-being through increased access to recreational spaces.

Summary

House Bill 06557, titled 'An Act Concerning Liability For The Recreational Use Of Lands', aims to clarify and modify the legal responsibilities of landowners regarding injuries that may occur during recreational use of their property. The bill emphasizes that landowners who allow public recreational use are not liable for accidents or injuries that happen, provided certain conditions are met. This legislation seeks to encourage landowners to make their lands available for public enjoyment without the fear of legal repercussions from potential accidents.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers, particularly from those who advocate for increased outdoor activities and accessibility to natural spaces. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for eliminating barriers that discourage landowners from allowing public access to their property. However, there are concerns raised about ensuring that safety measures are adhered to and that landowners take proper precautions to prevent accidents on their premises.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the extent of liability protection offered to landowners. Some critics argue that the bill may encourage negligence among landowners who might feel less compelled to maintain safe conditions on their property, as their liability is significantly limited. The balance between encouraging public recreational use and ensuring safety protocols is a crucial concern that emerges in legislative discussions, indicating a need for ongoing dialogue and potential amendments to address safety issues adequately.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.