Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00171

Introduced
1/18/11  
Introduced
1/18/11  
Refer
1/18/11  
Refer
2/24/11  
Refer
2/24/11  
Report Pass
3/10/11  
Report Pass
3/10/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Refer
3/16/11  
Report Pass
3/22/11  
Refer
4/21/11  
Report Pass
4/28/11  
Report Pass
4/28/11  
Report Pass
5/2/11  

Caption

An Act Concerning Disclosures To Beneficiaries Of Life Insurance Proceeds And Retained Asset Accounts.

Impact

The implementation of SB00171 is poised to enhance the regulatory framework for life insurance companies within the state, emphasizing transparency and informed decision-making by beneficiaries. By requiring insurance firms to provide detailed information regarding payment options and the specifics of retained asset accounts, the bill aims to protect beneficiaries from potential misunderstandings or mismanagement of their funds. It provides a structured approach to ensure that individuals receiving life insurance benefits are aware of their rights and available options, thus fostering a more equitable treatment of beneficiaries.

Summary

SB00171 is an act focusing on the disclosures required from life insurance companies to the beneficiaries of life insurance proceeds and the management of retained asset accounts. The bill mandates that life insurance companies must provide clear, comprehensible descriptions of all payment options available to beneficiaries. This includes the establishment of retained asset accounts, in which the proceeds may be deposited, and the various features associated with these accounts, such as interest rates, potential fees, withdrawal limitations, and the requirement for beneficiaries to understand their rights and obligations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00171 seems largely positive, with endorsements from consumer advocacy groups that appreciate the focus on transparency and beneficiary rights. Supporters see the bill as a necessary measure to improve financial literacy and empower beneficiaries at a vulnerable time. However, there may be concerns from insurance companies regarding the administrative burden associated with the additional disclosure requirements, which could lead to pushback during implementation as firms adapt to the new regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB00171 could arise from the extent and nature of the disclosures required. While advocates argue that the bill fosters better understanding and protection for beneficiaries, insurance companies might contend that the burdensome requirements could lead to increased operational costs and regulatory compliance challenges. Additionally, there may be debates about the impact of retained asset accounts on beneficiaries, particularly regarding the management of funds and the potential for fees or diminished returns due to the insurance company’s investments of those funds.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS HB178

Motor vehicle; revise law authorizing owner to designate beneficiary for transfer of ownership by increasing number of beneficiaries to four.

TX HB3121

Relating to a revocable deed that transfers real property at the transferor's death.

TX SB2150

Relating to a revocable deed that transfers real property at the transferor's death.

KY HB710

AN ACT relating to the retirement systems covered under the Kentucky Public Pensions Authority.

CA SB218

The Qualified ABLE Program: tax-advantaged savings accounts.

CA SB214

Medi-Cal: California Community Transitions program.

MS HB1430

Motor vehicle title; authorize beneficiary designation.

OK HB2080

Banks and trust companies; share or deposit accounts; payable on death; effective date.