Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00312

Introduced
1/20/11  
Introduced
1/20/11  
Refer
1/20/11  
Refer
1/20/11  
Refer
2/1/11  
Refer
2/1/11  
Report Pass
2/17/11  
Report Pass
2/17/11  
Refer
3/1/11  
Refer
3/1/11  
Report Pass
3/8/11  
Refer
5/12/11  
Refer
5/12/11  
Report Pass
5/16/11  
Report Pass
5/16/11  
Report Pass
5/17/11  
Report Pass
5/17/11  
Engrossed
5/31/11  
Engrossed
5/31/11  
Report Pass
6/1/11  

Caption

An Act Eliminating The Age Cap For Health Insurance Coverage For Specialized Formula.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by modifying sections 38a-492c and 38a-518c of the general statutes. It requires individual and group health insurance policies to provide coverage for necessary specialized formulas and nutritional products for treatment of inherited metabolic diseases, mirroring the coverage offered for outpatient prescription drugs. This could potentially alleviate financial burdens for individuals and families caring for those with these conditions, representing a significant shift in healthcare support for metabolic disorders.

Summary

SB00312, titled 'An Act Eliminating The Age Cap For Health Insurance Coverage For Specialized Formula', seeks to amend existing health insurance regulations related to coverage for specialized formulas used in the treatment of inherited metabolic diseases. This bill proposes to eliminate the age limit previously imposed, which restricted coverage to children up to the age of twelve. By allowing coverage for individuals beyond this age, the bill addresses the need for ongoing nutritional support for those affected by specific medical conditions throughout their lives. The bill aims to ensure that both amino acid modified preparations and low protein modified food products are included in health insurance policies when prescribed by a physician.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00312 has shown support for improved health coverage for a vulnerable population. Advocates for the bill, including health professionals and families affected by metabolic disorders, see this as a critical step toward enhancing quality of life and health outcomes. However, some concerns were raised by opponents regarding the potential for increased costs to health insurance providers and the implications for policy premiums. Despite these concerns, the prevailing sentiment appears to favor compassion and support for individuals in need of specialized nutritional care.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the financial implications of eliminating the age cap on insurance coverage for specialized formulas. While proponents argue that ensuring comprehensive care for patients is paramount, opponents express worries about how this increase in coverage requirements could affect overall health insurance costs. The discussion reflects broader themes in healthcare about equity, access to necessary treatments, and the financial sustainability of health systems as they adapt to meet diverse patient needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB395

Substance use treatment providers.

AZ HB2745

Court-ordered treatment; enhanced services

AZ SB1310

Court-ordered treatment; enhanced services.

AZ HB2944

Inpatient treatment days; computation; exclusion

CA SB349

California Ethical Treatment for Persons with Substance Use Disorder Act.

AZ HB2041

Mental health; voluntary evaluations; payment

CA AB1230

Gambling disorder prevention.

IA HF326

A bill for an act establishing a veterans recovery pilot program and fund for the reimbursement of expenses related to providing hyperbaric oxygen treatment to eligible veterans and making appropriations.(See HF 518.)