Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00842

Introduced
1/26/11  
Introduced
1/26/11  
Refer
1/26/11  
Refer
1/26/11  
Report Pass
2/24/11  

Caption

An Act Requiring Job Impact Statements On Certain Legislation Chosen By Legislative Leaders.

Impact

The bill seeks to amend how the legislative process addresses employment concerns by ensuring that the potential effects on jobs are documented before any bill is passed in the General Assembly. Each job impact statement must detail the possible job losses or gains associated with the proposed legislation and any costs that could be incurred by employers. This creates a new layer of accountability in the law-making process, aiming to better align legislation with the state’s economic health.

Summary

SB00842, titled 'An Act Requiring Job Impact Statements On Certain Legislation Chosen By Legislative Leaders', proposes a formal requirement for job impact statements to accompany selected legislation. The bill mandates that both majority and minority leaders in the state legislature submit lists of legislation concepts that they believe may affect employment. This process is designed to provide a clearer understanding of the potential job impacts of proposed laws, thus facilitating a more informed legislative process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00842 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with proponents arguing that it promotes transparency and responsibility in legislating economic matters. Advocates believe that this measure will empower legislators to make more prudent decisions regarding employment and economic growth. However, there may also be concerns about how these statements will be constructed and the methodology used, potentially complicating the legislative process.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding the bill could revolve around the workload it places on legislative staff and the implications for the speed and efficiency of passing laws. Critics may question whether the requirement for job impact statements could lead to delays in legislation, especially for urgent bills, as each may require additional analysis. Furthermore, there could be arguments regarding the objectivity and accuracy of the job impact statements, specifically how they will be calculated and who will conduct this analysis, raising concerns about political influence in the presentation of economic data.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

CA AB2051

Candidate’s statement.

CA AB2679

Fictitious business names: statements: publication.

CA AB515

Trial: statement of decision.

CA SB632

Vehicles: off-highway recreation: Red Rock Canyon State Park.

TX HB5377

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

TX SB2221

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

CA AB750

Crimes: perjury.