Connecticut Senate Bill SB00885

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/11
• Refer: 2/3/11
• Report Pass: 3/7/11
• Refer: 3/14/11
• Report Pass: 3/21/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Report Pass: 4/28/11
• Refer: 5/4/11
• Report Pass: 5/10/11
• Chaptered: 5/25/11
• Enrolled: 5/31/11
• Passed: 6/3/11

Caption

An Act Permitting Inquiry Access To The Department Of Developmental Services' Abuse And Neglect Registry For Charitable Organizations Which Recruit Volunteers To Work With Persons With Intellectual Disabilities.

Impact

The enactment of SB00885 would modify existing statutes concerning the confidentiality of the Abuse and Neglect Registry. Previously, access to the registry was limited to certain authorized agencies and employers involved in protective services and employment for department clients. With this bill, charitable organizations will also have the means to access this important information, thereby increasing the accountability and safety measures surrounding volunteer recruitment and involvement.

Summary

Senate Bill 00885 proposes to expand access to the Department of Developmental Services' Abuse and Neglect Registry for charitable organizations that recruit volunteers to work with individuals who have intellectual disabilities. This change is aimed at enhancing the safety and protection of vulnerable populations by permitting these organizations to conduct background checks on their volunteers. The bill seeks to ensure that individuals engaged in activities with persons with intellectual disabilities do not have a history of abuse or neglect reported in this central registry.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00885 is largely supportive amongst stakeholders who prioritize the protection of vulnerable individuals and appreciate the bill's intent to enhance safety protocols within charitable organizations. Most discussions indicate a collective agreement on the necessity of background checks for volunteers, recognizing that this step is critical in fostering a safe environment for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The bill was passed with unanimous support, suggesting a strong bipartisan consensus on the importance of the issue at hand.

Contention

While the bill has received widespread support, there may be underlying concerns regarding the implications of expanding access to sensitive information. Potential points of contention include the protocols for approving organizations to access the registry and ensuring that the rights of individuals associated with the registry are maintained. Critics could argue that broader access might lead to misuse or breaches of privacy, and discussions around these aspects may arise as the bill is implemented.