Connecticut Senate Bill SB00909

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/11
• Refer: 2/4/11
• Report Pass: 3/15/11
• Refer: 3/23/11
• Report Pass: 3/29/11
• Refer: 5/5/11

Caption

An Act Concerning A Reallocation Of Funds Within The Csus 2020 Infrastructure Improvement Program For Additions And Renovations To Buley Library.

Impact

The enactment of SB00909 is expected to impact state laws governing the allocation of funds for educational infrastructure projects. By focusing resources on specific projects like the Buley Library renovation, the bill supports the ongoing development and modernization of university facilities, which is crucial for accommodating current and future educational demands. It illustrates a commitment to enhancing the educational environment within the Connecticut State University system.

Summary

SB00909, titled 'An Act Concerning A Reallocation Of Funds Within The CSUS 2020 Infrastructure Improvement Program For Additions And Renovations To Buley Library', aims to redirect funding within the CSUS 2020 initiative to support necessary upgrades and renovations at Buley Library. This bill emphasizes the importance of maintaining and enhancing campus facilities to provide better services for students and faculty within the state's higher education framework.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00909 appears to be supportive, particularly among stakeholders who prioritize educational infrastructure improvements. Legislators and educational advocates often emphasize the need for adequate funding to ensure that institutions can offer a high-quality learning environment. However, as with many funding reallocations, there are questions regarding the prioritization of fund allocation among various state projects.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise related to the prioritization of funding within the CSUS system, as different projects compete for limited resources. While proponents of SB00909 advocate for the immediate needs of the Buley Library, there may be concerns raised by those representing other institutions or projects facing delays. This highlights the ongoing tension within state budgeting processes, balancing immediate infrastructure needs against broader funding distribution across the university system.