Connecticut Senate Bill SB01119

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/11
• Refer: 3/2/11
• Report Pass: 3/23/11
• Refer: 4/1/11
• Report Pass: 4/7/11
• Refer: 5/11/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Licensing Agreements Of The Department Of Public Works, The Prequalification Of Bidders And Bid Protests.

Impact

The changes proposed in SB01119 are set to impact state laws related to how state resources are utilized. The bill repeals and substitutes several provisions of existing statutes, thus centralizing the authority of the Commissioner of Public Works in leasing arrangements. The intent is to simplify the process through which state properties can be utilized, potentially increasing use and generating revenue for the state. However, it also raises questions regarding local governance and the ability of municipalities to be notified and involved in the leasing process, especially concerning state-owned properties located within their jurisdictions.

Summary

SB01119 is an act concerning licensing agreements of the Department of Public Works, as well as the prequalification of bidders and bid protests. The bill aims to amend provisions regarding how state-owned land and facilities can be leased or licensed for public or private use, with an emphasis on ensuring that these actions produce income or serve the public interest. One of the key elements of the bill is the emphasis on establishing rental rates or licensing fees that align with prevailing market rates, promoting fairness and transparency in public transactions.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB01119 appears to be cautiously supportive, with some stakeholders acknowledging the need for updates to existing laws to reflect current practices. Supporters likely view the bill as a necessary modernization effort, while critics may voice concerns regarding the potential lack of local input and the implications for community oversight on state-initiated leasing decisions. It illustrates a balancing act between operational efficiency at the state level and maintaining adequate communication and control at the local level.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for conflicts between state leasing practices and local governance rights. The bill's provisions that allow the commissioner to proceed with leasing agreements without local notification in specific instances could lead to frustrations among municipal leaders and local citizens. This tension highlights the ongoing debate over the proper scope of state versus local authority, especially in decisions that affect community resources and interests.