Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05172

Introduced
2/16/12  
Introduced
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Refer
2/16/12  
Report Pass
3/13/12  
Report Pass
3/13/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Refer
3/30/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning State Military Service.

Impact

The proposed legislation has notable implications for state law as it seeks to incorporate provisions that ensure state military personnel are treated similarly to their federally recognized counterparts. It establishes that those serving in state military duties will be regarded as state employees for specific legal purposes, including liability and workers' compensation claims. These changes could provide significant advantages for service members, particularly in terms of job security and benefits upon returning from service.

Summary

House Bill 05172, titled 'An Act Concerning State Military Service,' aims to amend several sections of state law related to the compensation and treatment of military personnel who serve under state orders. The bill seeks to align the pay and benefits received by state military personnel with those of federal military pay scales, providing equitable compensation for members of the Connecticut National Guard and other state military forces when called to active duty by the Governor. This includes enhancements to the pay structures and provisions for benefits continuation during periods of service.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 05172 appears to be supportive among legislators and advocacy groups for military personnel. Proponents argue that this measure is long overdue and reflects a commitment to honoring the service of military members by ensuring they receive fair and adequate compensation. However, there may be some contention around budgetary implications, as enhancing military compensation could place additional financial strains on the state budget.

Contention

One area of contention regarding HB 05172 involves the financial impact on state resources, particularly in relation to how the state will fund these enhanced benefits and compensations for military personnel. Critics may express concerns about potential cuts to other services or programs necessary to accommodate the financial requirements of this bill, raising questions about priorities in state spending. Overall, this bill is viewed as a step towards improving conditions for military service members, yet it comes with financial challenges that require careful consideration.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

DE HB356

An Act To Amend Titles 10 And 29 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Concurrent Jurisdiction Of Juveniles Who Commit Crimes On United States Military Installations.

CT HB06440

An Act Concerning The Organized Militia And The Governor's Guards.

CT HB06348

An Act Concerning State Military Service.

NJ A2579

Creates Military and Veterans Affairs Oversight Board.

AL HB412

Alabama Code of Military Justice

OK HB2382

Militia; modifying and updating provisions of the Oklahoma Military Code; effective date.

OK HB2382

Militia; modifying and updating provisions of the Oklahoma Military Code; effective date.

OK HB3902

Militia; modifying and updating provisions of the Oklahoma Military Code; effective date.