Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05263

Introduced
2/22/12  
Refer
2/22/12  
Report Pass
3/23/12  
Report Pass
3/23/12  
Refer
4/4/12  
Refer
4/4/12  
Report Pass
4/11/12  
Report Pass
4/11/12  
Refer
4/17/12  
Refer
4/17/12  
Report Pass
4/19/12  
Engrossed
5/2/12  
Report Pass
5/3/12  
Report Pass
5/3/12  
Chaptered
5/18/12  
Chaptered
5/18/12  
Enrolled
5/23/12  
Enrolled
5/23/12  

Caption

An Act Increasing The Penalty For Poaching.

Impact

The implementation of HB 5263 will adjust existing laws under Section 53a-109 of the general statutes, significantly increasing the penalties for individuals found guilty of poaching offenses. The bill classifies criminal trespass for hunting, trapping, or fishing without permission as a class B misdemeanor, which carries a fine ranging from $500 to $1,000. This alteration is designed to enhance compliance with wildlife protection laws and to support conservation efforts by imposing stricter consequences for violations.

Summary

House Bill 5263, titled 'An Act Increasing The Penalty For Poaching', aims to enhance the penalties imposed for poaching-related offenses. Specifically, the bill proposes to amend the legal definitions and consequences surrounding criminal trespass, particularly in the context of hunting, trapping, and fishing activities on public and private lands. By elevating the severity of these offenses, the bill seeks to deter illegal hunting and protect wildlife resources effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5263 appears supportive, particularly among conservationists and wildlife advocates who view the bill as a necessary step toward bolstering protections for wildlife. Proponents of the bill argue that higher fines and penalties will contribute to better adherence to hunting regulations and a subsequent decrease in illegal poaching activities. However, concerns arise from opponents who argue that increasing penalties may disproportionately affect lower-income hunters who rely on hunting for sustenance.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HB 5263 center on the balance between wildlife conservation and the rights of individuals who hunt for subsistence. Some legislators raised concerns about the equity of imposing heavier fines, while others emphasized the importance of protecting wildlife from unsanctioned hunting practices. The discussions revealed a notable tension between the necessity of stringent laws to combat poaching and the potential unintended consequences for local hunters, particularly in rural communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.